In administration law, has argued cases involving judicial review and declarations of
nullity of administrative decisions and executive orders - in - council.
Not exact matches
Again, Anisminic is sometimes taken as authority for the proposition that unlawful
administrative decisions are
nullities, that they never existed in the eyes
of the law, with the corollary that judges should not have any discretion to refuse judicial review remedies.
Judicial adventurism in Anisminic paved the way for Racal, where Lord Diplock, in obiter dicta, misinterpreted Anisminic to find that an
administrative decision based on an error
of law is automatically a
nullity.