Not exact matches
If we're acknowledging that severe
injuries are inevitable, then what this rule is saying «we're ok with a certain
number of severe
injuries, just not tooooooo many.»
It all seems to have become too much for Ozil and having missed a
number of weeks since the turn
of 2017, citing different
injuries as the reason for his absence, you have to wonder
if all these
injury concerns were genuine or not.
Do not fear Gooners, the title may suggest that Aaron Ramsey has had a setback in his return from
injury and
of course that would likely mean that he's out for a «
number of months»
if the usual Arsenal procedure was to take place.
Mind you, Southampton lost 8 key players plus a manager in the transfer window, they now sit fourth, 3 pts ahead
of us.We can no longer use
injuries as an excuse because we have always had them, and
if wenger was a smart manager, he would have addressed this problem by having better squad depth, but instead he chose to send a defender out on loan despite being short in
numbers at the back, foolishly chose not to sign a defender despite an array
of good defenders on show at the world cup.So now who is to blame?I guess it's anyone or anything but Wenger.
if not for the reoccurring
injuries, I believe we have the right
number of players to go for all 3 competitions..
Even
if you're dealing with a crazy
number of early
injuries (and BSU was), that's simply not supposed to happen.
They would have a crazy high
number of injuries on their hands
if guys had to pitch to 3 batters and a lower
number of bullpen spots.
If we had the same
number of injuries we would be a bit short.»
I think our constant
injury worries could stem from the fact that we have overall had a young squad for a
number of seasons,
if young players are overplayed they pick up
injuries more easily which stick with them.
Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player
of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as
if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years
of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.
If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an
injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count
of the
number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see
if he'd stand out in a smaller club.
The
injury crisis we're currently in has been placed entirely on his shoulders and maybe rightly so (selling and loaning out defenders when we are short on
numbers) for me that's the only crime he committed but
if someone has the full picture
of what happened in summer enlighten me because maybe just maybe he wanted to bring in a defender but the board didn't avail the funds to him.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute...
if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season,
if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when
injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the
injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit...
if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon,
if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the
numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Obviously
if we didn't have a
number of injuries things would be different.
As a matter
of fact, Wilshere
injury was a «blessing» as that deluded manager
of ours put in his mind that he was to become our new «chef d'orchestre» when he clearly does not have the quality and the skills (15 games as a
number 10 and we won only 5... This is where we lost the league
if we were supposed to win it.
If we are to seriously challenge for EPL and CL, we need to have quality strength in each position, to allow AW to rotate and to cover for inevitable
injuries caused by
number of games.
If he was
injury free for a while season he would probably get a decent
number of goals.
Pulis spoke about the
number of key
injuries that Arsene Wenger has had to cope with, as an earlier Just Arsenal post explained, but our German defender was much more specific in his own comments and pointed to the amazing effect and positive impact that our Chile international forward Alexis Sanchez can have on a game
if he is fit and in form.
I'm far more worried about TCU because
of the absurd
number of injuries, but
if you can continue to put up wins, you can worry about style points at a later date.
Chelsea and City had the lowest
number of injuries last season
if you think it isn't the most important thing (ending 1s and 2nd).
So the thing stands like -
If we win at Galatasray (very possible) and if BvB lose at home (given the number of injuries, very possible) than we top the group and than have every chance of drawing (as it stands) Schalke 04, Basel, Zenit, but have also the possibility of drawing Barcelona or Juventus (they are second in their respective group) and given your luck we will somehow still draw Barc
If we win at Galatasray (very possible) and
if BvB lose at home (given the number of injuries, very possible) than we top the group and than have every chance of drawing (as it stands) Schalke 04, Basel, Zenit, but have also the possibility of drawing Barcelona or Juventus (they are second in their respective group) and given your luck we will somehow still draw Barc
if BvB lose at home (given the
number of injuries, very possible) than we top the group and than have every chance
of drawing (as it stands) Schalke 04, Basel, Zenit, but have also the possibility
of drawing Barcelona or Juventus (they are second in their respective group) and given your luck we will somehow still draw Barca.
Speaking on the Hawksbee and Jacobs show, the outspoken Dutchman said: «
If you look at the facts, what you see is that Arsenal are the
number one by far in terms
of injuries in the last decade in the Premier League.
if wenger had planned for the very high (but usual, expected & predictable)
number of injuries by expecting that 2 - 3 months into the season, 1/3
of his squad would be injured, and
if he would be willing to rotate enough players, then we would no longer have the stamina problem.
Now this season is looking good and
if we can keep the
number of injuries down to a more reasonable level, who knows?
The stats do back up Pires, because Arsenal took 19 points from the eight EPL games before Cazorla's
injury in mid October and
if we had carried on that
number of points per game the Gunners would currently have 76 points, two more than Tottenham and two fewer than Chelsea but with an extra game to play.
Overall I am happy with a draw... Yes we could easily have won the game
if giroud had taken some
of the easy chances he was presented with, but the spuds could just have easily gone 2 - 0 up a
number of times... We could have gone top
of the league today but with all the
injuries at the moment the most important thing is that we didn't lose ground on city... Looking forward to after the international break when we will have the majority
of our players back #COYG
However, in this particular case, the club was dealing with a player who had previously been forced to take time out
of the sport after suffering a
number of head
injuries in short succession and even
if they followed the correct procedures, surely common sense dictates extra caution would have been wise.
He's definitely lived up to his promises too with debuts handed to a
number of players, even
if some
of them were enforced due to
injury.
After hopefully overcoming a
number of injury problems,
if he can stay fit, we can see why Klopp would consider him in January especially as he's out
of contract and available on a free transfer in the summer.
If you look at the
number of injuries we had, it is not a big
number compared to previous years or compared to other clubs.
A significant
number of these
injuries could be prevented
if parents, athletes and soccer organizations employed the following safety measures:
While some meta - analyses
of home visiting programs suggest that many types
of home visiting programs can make a difference in reducing adverse outcomes such as child maltreatment and childhood
injuries, 14,15 meta - analyses can produce misleading results
if there are insufficient
numbers of trials
of programs represented in the cross-classification
of home visiting target populations, program models, and visitors» backgrounds.
You should definitely talk to your doctor as soon as possible
if your child is eating non-food items, because conditions like pica can result in a
number of serious health issues — lead poisoning, constipation, diarrhea, intestinal obstruction or perforation, parasites, infection, or tooth and mouth
injuries.
In nulliparous women, a period
of 8 hours
of augmentation resulted in an 18 % cesarean delivery rate and no cases
of birth
injury or asphyxia, whereas
if the period
of augmentation had been limited to 4 hours, the cesarean delivery rate would have been twice as high given the
number of women who had not made significant progress at 4 hours.
A
number of the hospital personnel and I wrote peoples»
injuries in indelible marker on their chests so that
if the chart got separated from the patient, we could figure out which patient is which.
Studying laboratory rats, Rutgers scientists found, however, that within a month after experimental brain
injury, the
number of new brain cells declined dramatically, below the
numbers of new neurons that would have been detected
if an
injury had not occurred.
«
If EMTs and medics had particles like these that could be injected and then go specifically to the site
of a serious
injury, they could help decrease the
number of deaths associated with serious
injuries.»
«This study evaluated the
number of minors who visited an emergency department over a two year period for
injuries resulting from contact with law enforcement and demonstrates this issue comes with significant financial,
if not human, cost,» says Alexandre Rotta, MD, FCCM, Chief, Division
of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at UH Rainbow and the study's senior investigator.
Then,
if required, they will then treat the
injury and prescribe and progress a full calf strain rehabilitation program consisting
of a
number of stretching and strengthening exercises.
If you wish to protect your back from
injury, there are a
number of things that you can do that are far more effective than wearing a back - belt.
From now on you want to keep the
number of sets and reps low as there is a high risk
of injury with the progressions
of the one arm chin
if you over train and remember your goal is to build strength rather than muscular endurance so I would not do more that 5 reps for each set and no more than two sets for each arm.
You will dramatically reduce your risk
of injury if you warm up your muscles adequately and gradually progress the weights with a
number of warm up sets.
Men who may have received
injury to their testicular region during any
number of activities should consult with their doctor immediately to determine what,
if any, treatment plans are available.
This all takes place within the space
of two weeks, and that's some dramatic licence, even
if Goran Ivanisevic was a wild card when he came back from
injury to win Wimbledon in 2001 - but he had previously been world
Number Two.
This «sensitivity» is easily understood
if we simply study and are alive to the
number and depth
of the
injuries inflicted upon a native during a single day spent amidst the colonial regime.
However, the American Veterinary Medical Association has publicly stated that it isn't possible to calculate accurate bite rates for breeds, «[because] mixed breeds are commonly described as purebreds... [and] the actual
number of bites that occur in a community is not known...
if they did not result in serious
injury.»
There is no cure, and FIV positive cats are vulnerable to a
number of secondary infections due to a suppressed immune system, especially
if they are allowed outdoors where they are exposed to more illness and
injury.
* has spent a
number of years studying and learning about their breed * is active in one or more breed clubs or similar groups and thus is in regular contact with other people in the breed * knows their breeding stock inside and out for several generations back * has an «eye for a dog» and has developed a detailed picture
of the type
of dog they're breeding toward * almost always compete in some in some sort
of activity with their dogs (conformation, working activities, obedience etc.) so as to have a realistic idea
of how their dogs compare to others
of the same the breed * is knowledgable about the hereditary problems that occur in their breed and has the appropriate tests done prior to breeding in order to decrease the likelihood
of their occurance in their pups * considers temperament important * is knowledgable about the mating and whelping
of dogs in general, so as to minimize the chances
of injury or death to the breeding dogs * is extremely concerned with the quality
of the homes that their puppies are destinied for, to the point
of not performing a breeding
if they don't feel good homes will be available for the pups * never has more dogs
of their own than they are properly able to care for * is willing and able to educate and build a relationship with their puppy buyers * is honest * uses spay / neuter contracts and / or limited registration to prevent the casual breeding
of their puppies * is ALWAYS willing to take back a dog
of their breeding
if a puppy buyer can not keep it for any reason.
It's important to keep them on a short tether in icy situations and avoid walking on ice all together
if possible to avoid a slip or fall that could result in a slipped disk, broken bone or a
number of other avoidable
injuries.
INJURIES:
If another dog injures your dog, get the name, address and phone
number of the other dog's owner / handler and the license and rabies tag
number of the dog.
If your pet is one
of the rare patients that does not tolerate working in the UWT, there are a
number of other activities that we can do to help your pet recover from
injury or surgery.