Not exact matches
When discussing student performance on
achievement tests, Barton notes that private or religious schools account for a disproportionately high
number of National Merit Scholars and says that is because «one school utilizes religions principles and one does not.»
«Over the past decade we've been able to identify a growing
number of educational interventions that have managed to have notable impacts on students» academic
achievement as measured by standardized
tests,» West says.
For schools in the bottom quartile
of the
number of teachers with
tested students, that is, schools with approximately 10 or fewer such teachers in elementary and K — 8 schools and five or fewer in middle schools, school - wide merit pay did lead to improved student
achievement.
President Barack Obama has often noted in speeches the enthusiasm
of Korean parents for their children's education, the high quality
of Korean teachers, the
number of learning hours that Korean students spend, and the outstanding educational
achievements these have produced; for example, top rankings in international academic -
achievement tests, and low rates
of school dropouts and juvenile delinquency.
University
of Washington researchers use state
test scores, rates
of free and reduced lunch, and the
number of AP classes that students enroll in to determine the general level
of school
achievement for comparison.
Consistent with the Wisconsin evidence, parallel studies in Colorado and Maryland found that weather - related differences in the
number of days students had spent in school when they were
tested had noticeable effects on their
achievement.
Evaluations
of any educational technology program often confront a
number of methodological problems, including the need for measures other than standardized
achievement tests, differences among students in the opportunity to learn, and differences in starting points and program implementation.
The goal is literally to double or triple education results — to increase from 30 percent the
number of students who perform proficiently on
tests of academic
achievement to 60 and then 90 percent.
NCLB, while broadening awareness
of the
achievement gap, simultaneously narrowed the purpose
of our nation's schools, boiling the whole endeavor down to the incremental movement
of testing numbers as an attempt to say something about student literacy and numeracy.
Still, its detractors argue that the law has had unfortunate side effects: too much time spent teaching to narrow
tests, schools focused on boosting the scores
of students who are just below the proficiency threshold, and some states lowering their standards to reduce the
number of schools missing their
achievement targets.
Participation in afterschool programs is influencing academic performance in a
number of ways, including better attitudes toward school and higher educational aspirations; higher school attendance rates and lower tardiness rates; less disciplinary action, such as suspension; lower dropout rates; better performance in school, as measured by
achievement test scores and grades; significant gains in academic
achievement test scores; greater on - time promotion; improved homework completion; and deeper engagement in learning.
Since 2006, the
number of Houston schools earning one
of the state's top ratings has more than doubled to exceed 200 campuses, fewer students are repeating a grade level, and more are
testing at the highest levels
of academic
achievement.
Although African American and Hispanic students had fairly similar scores on the baseline
achievement test, students in these groups differed in a
number of respects.
With respect to the research on
test - based accountability, Principal Investigator Jimmy Kim adds: «While we embrace the overall objective
of the federal law — to narrow the
achievement gap among different subgroups
of students — NCLB's
test - based accountability policies fail to reward schools for making progress and unfairly punish schools serving large
numbers of low - income and minority students.
Attention to
test scores in the value - added estimation raises issues
of the narrowness
of the
tests,
of the limited
numbers of teachers in
tested subjects and grades,
of the accuracy
of linking teachers and students, and
of the measurement errors in the
achievement tests.
Their intimate knowledge
of the technical difficulties involved in measuring student
achievement makes a
number of these
testing experts some
of the most vocal (and persuasive) opponents
of testing.
Contemporary accountability policies have created the added expectation that districts will differentiate support to schools on the basis
of achievement results from state
testing programs and other accountability measures, with particular attention to be given to schools where large
numbers of students are not meeting standards
of proficiency.
There are also
achievement tests, which offer a standard score, that is a score based on a mean
of 100, and a standard deviation
of some
number, commonly 15 or 16, to match the Wechsler or Stanford Binet, respectively.
And a report from the Southern Regional Education Board, which supports increasing the
number of middle students taking Algebra I, found that among students in the lowest quartile on
achievement tests, those enrolled in higher - level mathematics had a slightly higher failure rate than those enrolled in lower - level mathematics (Cooney & Bottoms, 2009, p. 2).»
As we've heard from a
number of parents and educators, some are hesitant to have
test scores from the early years
of PARCC factor, even minimally, into measurements
of student
achievement and teacher evaluations.
In cases where
achievement is weighted heavily, as with the current formula, schools with high
numbers of students who perform as above on state
tests have lower school performance grades
of C, D, or F. By simply shifting the formula to 50 - 50, many
of those C schools would earn a B, and D schools would move to C, and so on.
Phone call # 4: The mother
of a highly gifted girl who does algebra in her head «for fun» and consistently scores four years above grade level on
tests of mathematics
achievement called to ask me how she could convince the classroom teacher and the gifted coordinator that her young daughter did not need to keep adding and subtracting one - and two - digit
numbers with the rest
of the third grade class.
Achievement tests are useful but they are not nearly strong enough predictors
of later life outcomes to empower a portfolio manager to close a significant
number of schools because he or she «knows» that those schools are «bad.»
The state
of California has implemented a
number measures to close one
of the largest and most persistent
achievement gaps in the nation, Recently released scores for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a nationwide test for fourth - and eighth - graders in math and reading given every two years, show that California's students are still performing below the... Continue reading California: Moving the Needle on the Achi
achievement gaps in the nation, Recently released scores for the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, a nationwide
test for fourth - and eighth - graders in math and reading given every two years, show that California's students are still performing below the... Continue reading California: Moving the Needle on the
AchievementAchievement Gap
The tendency to casually focus on student
achievement, especially given the
testing system's heavy emphasis on reading and math, allows a large
number of employees to either be excused from results - driven accountability or be held accountable for activities over which they have no control.
Leonie did some quick research and discovered that there were blog posts and even web sites complaining about the pineapple story, which had been used on a
number of state
tests including the Illinois Standards Achievement Tests (I
tests including the Illinois Standards
Achievement Tests (I
Tests (ISAT).
But Sonja Santelises, vice president for K - 12 policy and practice at The Education Trust, a Washington, D.C. - based nonprofit that works to close
achievement gaps, sees a danger in large
numbers of children with disabilities opting out
of state
tests.
A dozen
of those states use those
tests to measure
achievement, the same
number as last year, but a big jump from years ago, when only a handful used college - admissions
tests for that purpose.
State board President Michael Kirst and other members have made it clear that they intend to replace the API, which calculates a three - digit
number based primarily on a school's or district's standardized
test scores, with a new system in which
test scores would be just one
of many measures
of student
achievement and school performance.
Unfortunately, the growth in the
number of non-teachers has not translated into student
achievement as
test scores have largely remained flat during this time period.
However, most
of these
tests are multiple choice, standardized measures
of achievement, which have had a
number of unintended consequences, including: narrowing
of the academic curriculum and experiences
of students (especially in schools serving our most school - dependent children); a focus on recognizing right answers to lower - level questions rather than on developing higher - order thinking, reasoning, and performance skills; and growing dissatisfaction among parents and educators with the school experience.
States differ in the amount budgeted for education, often with little to no apparent correlation between
number of dollars spent and graduation rates or scores on
achievement tests.
When asked what should determine teacher pay, 86 percent said a teacher's education and training should be either the most important or an important factor, followed by 77 percent who said their students»
achievement and progress on a range
of measures including standardized
tests, classroom observations and parent feedback; 77 percent said whether the teacher is at a low - performing school where students need the most help; 64 percent who said students»
achievement and progress on standardized
tests; and 57 percent who said seniority in the
number of years
of classroom teaching experience.
A growing
number of state teacher evaluation systems are focused exclusively on using
tests to measure student growth or
achievement.
Lack
of progress and growing opposition to high - stakes
testing have led a growing
number of educators and policy advocates to conclude that education policies and the strategies used to help underperforming schools and to promote student
achievement must change.
In reading and math, the
number of PATHS lessons taught was a significant predictor
of achievement, with students who received more lessons becoming more likely to achieve basic proficiency on the
tests.
In the past five years, the district has seen steady increases in both
achievement and growth rates for students with disabilities and ELLs on state
tests, and a steady decline in the
number of «unsatisfactory» schools on state report cards.
The goal is to
test the following: If an urban district, and its principal training programs, provide a large
number of talented aspiring principals with the right pre-service training and on - the - job support, the result will be a pipeline
of principals able to improve teacher quality and student
achievement, especially in schools with the greatest needs.
In fact, the man who tried to quadruple the
number of standardized
tests in order to «train» student on how to increase their CMT
test scores managed to come up with a system that actually appears to have lowered academic
achievement as measured by the fraudulent CMT
Testing system.
PURE supports the annual limitation on the
number of standardized academic
achievement tests given to students as proposed in SB 2156.
As a recent issue brief on the
achievement gap from the Educational
Testing Service points out, schools having high
numbers of minority students tend to have larger classes
of 25 students or more, and the class size gap between high - minority schools and low - minority schools actually worsened between 2000 - 2004.
For example, a larger
number of students from disadvantaged communities can take Advanced Placement courses if they have demonstrated proficient levels
of achievement on a
test that accurately and fairly measures their academic ability.
Two options were explored for reaching parents with the program: Chapter I pilot schools (schools which qualify for federal funds based on economic and
achievement criteria, e.g. those which serve a high
number of free or reduced - price lunches and also have a large
number of children under - achieving on group
tests), and adult education programs.