Not exact matches
Surely an unplanned blunder on Newsweek's part, but a blunder nonetheless (perhaps worse in the long run exactly because it was unconscious and indicates not deliberate
discrimination but a naive lack
of sensitivity) A balance
of exceptional model elders with equal
numbers of average everyday folk would provide a more accurate picture
of the
aging as they really are, with their very human combinations
of merits and faults.
in the face
of rising productivity and affluence, older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs; the setting
of arbitrary
age limits regardless
of potential for job performance has become a common practice, and certain otherwise desirable practices may work to the disadvantage
of older persons; the incidence
of unemployment, especially long - term unemployment with resultant deterioration
of skill, morale, and employer acceptability is, relative to the younger
ages, high among older workers; their
numbers are great and growing; and their employment problems grave; the existence in industries affecting commerce,
of arbitrary
discrimination in employment because
of age, burdens commerce and the free flow
of goods in commerce.
Recently, John has been involved in a substantial
number of cases concerning employment law and pensions, concerning matters such as the closure
of Defined Benefit schemes, and
age discrimination issues.
That being said,
age discrimination is illegal, and I've been fortunate enough to work with countless
numbers of Baby Boomers who have landed meaningful employment and even made successful career changes.
There are a
number of factors at play here, including
age discrimination.
This is technically a form
of discrimination, however large
numbers of late middle -
aged job seekers fail to find work despite possessing necessary qualifications and experience.