Sentences with phrase «number of alarmists»

You can see where a number of the alarmists are going.

Now, it is quite possible to find any number of skeptics in the employ of industry — as you can find any number of alarmists in the same professions.

Naomi Oreskes conceived the idea for the Attorneys General United for Clean Power with a number of alarmist colleagues in mind.

Not exact matches

A remarkable number of alarming — and alarmist — statistics appear in the report's dozen pages.

Amid alarmist media coverage on the predicted numbers of jobs that will be lost to the combined effects of automation, artificial intelligence, machine learning and robotics, we like to take a regular look at some of the newer...

The number of hard - core CO2 alarmists is quite small, but lukewarmers know that any disagreement with them is likely to have unfortunate consequences.

The 47,000 wildfires last year may seem like a very large number — and it certainly gives global warming alarmists like Brown plenty of fodder for misleading global warming claims — but the 47,000 wildfires was less than half the average number of wildfires that occurred each year in the 1960s and 1970s.

I found a number of discrepancies, which are written up in the paper, and do much (in my view) to support Professor Tol's claim that the report's alarmist tone was largely groundless.

The numbers between a sceptical estimate of ECS and an alarmist estimate of the same existed before the word «lukewarm» came to represent such a position.

What I have to continue to ask alarmists is why 97 % carries weight when it comes to numbers of scientists, but not when 97 % / yr CO2 emissions are natural.

Warming alarmists like to talk about us pumping BILLION OF TONS OF CO2 into the atmosphere, because big numbers sound scary.

A number of climate alarmists eventually briefed the same staffers.

The central idea of the article is a vicious feedback loop: Scientists make meaningless or ambiguous statements = > Advocates and media translate statements into alarmist declarations = > Politicians respond to alarm by feeding scientists more money = > [a larger number of scientists and pseudo --RSB- Scientists make meaningless or ambiguous [or false] statements...

Most climate alarmists wouldn't know the answer to that question, either, and even most of those who would know because they just memorized a number from an article wouldn't really know what it means, whether it means anything, and how such numbers may be estimated.

And you can find any number of corporate grants openly supporting projects by individuals who may be regarded by some as skeptics just as these same companies fund research projects supporting the alarmist narrative.

CAGW assumes old (1) but is an invalid hypothesis based on a number of other violations of the scientific method and must be abandoned despite its strong support by the alleged alarmist «consensus.»

I know NOAA says the decade saw warming of.2 °C, but it's fairly obvious that this number was a result of some major «adjustments» to the models, given that, as noted in the blog above, everyone, including major climate alarmists like Phil Jones and Tim Flannery, had accepted that the planet did not warm, on average, for the decade.

And besides, I think it makes a nice contrast with a number of leading climate alarmist sites that do not accept comments or are Stalinist in purging dissent from them.

· Subject all such information to proper peer review by independent scientists, including the significant numbers of experts who are skeptical of alarmist pollution and climate change claims;

Please, provide a plot of the number of scientists who dare speak against global warming alarmists vs. year, with the source.

The alarmists already have a large number of official reports, so it will be important to finally see the opposition views laid out officially.

No group of climate alarmist scientists has come anywhere near the OISM's numbers.

Although I have seen a pretty good number of former alarmists who say they are now skeptics of the «dangerous MMGW» narrative, due in large part to reading WUWT articles and comments.

Dr. Hansen, along with a number of other climate change alarmists (like Al Gore), believes that man is the chief cause of global warming, and that warming is generally harmful.

Due to the prominent stature and rapidly growing numbers of these «skeptic» experts (or «realist,» if you prefer), it is becoming increasingly difficult for the alarmists to sustain their claims.

They said, how bad do we want to scare all the alarmist who are on our side, and they just wrote that number down and then put some hocus pocus in front of it.

Compared to the use of other labels, such as denier and alarmist for example, these are small numbers.

Other oddities to this episode were the number of prominent climate scientists, including some usually on the «alarmist» side of the public debate, criticizing the paper, and the general low - key news coverage.

Had climate scientists «brainstormed» decades ago about the large number of diverse causes, their relative contributions, the evidence in hand and the evidence needed, before starting the alarmist crusade, this essay would likely not have been written.

There are a number of crimes which have been committed by the climate alarmist establishment.

Only a tiny number of cranks deny «climate change» outright, though a few CO2 alarmists think that only CO2 - induced climate change exists; nothing can be learned from such a tiny cohort.

I don't think that it's «alarmist» to be alarmed about events in the Yamal when seen in this new martian context — Siberian news reports last year described mapping of 7000 methane - venting mounds across the Yamal - Gydan (The Siberian Times, 27/03/2017), a number far in excess of the global frost mound population (~ 5000 [Mackay, 1998]-RRB- as of 1998.

Especially problematic, Gore and his fellow alarmists insist, is the growing number of people in Africa, where the UN Population Fund and the Obama administration are working fiendishly to reduce the population.