Sentences with phrase «number of district court»

Against the contracting number of district court cases and the unfamiliarity of PTAB, the only thing that's certain is the need to remain informed.

According to the government's briefing in Dean, most of the circuits had also ruled like the Eighth Circuit (incorrectly) on this statutory sentencing issue — though I suspect that, in practice, a number of district courts did not consistently ignore 924 (c) mandates when sentencing predicate offenses.

Not exact matches

That hearing was followed up by Trump announcing his seventh wave of judicial nominees, an additional 15 names that are about to be submitted to the Senate, bringing the total number of district and circuit court judges he's nominated to roughly 50 — blowing far past the number of judicial nominations made at this stage of a presidency by any recent predecessors.

The number of legal challenges in the District surged after the appeals court in 2016 overturned the Zoning Commission's approval of a project to redevelop McMillan Park in Northwest into a complex of residential units, offices, a new park and a supermarket.

Your name, physical address and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which your physical address is located, or if your physical address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of allegedly infringing material or an agent of suchDistrict Court for the judicial district in which your physical address is located, or if your physical address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of allegedly infringing material or an agent of suchdistrict in which your physical address is located, or if your physical address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of allegedly infringing material or an agent of suchdistrict in which BEAM SUNTORY may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of allegedly infringing material or an agent of such person.

The week before, after three days of hearings in a U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, Federal Judge James Noland reversed a USAC ban that would have kept six CART teams — numbering among them drivers such as defending Indy champ Al Unser, his brother Bobby, and former winners Johnny Rutherford and Gordon Johncock — from competing in this year's race.

While Burdette Court residents and their neighbors are only a fraction of the 1,250 families in the park district, a larger, undetermined number of taxpayers might be allowed to bail out of the park district if a bill were drafted and passed.

CHICAGO — Seeking more than $ 1 million, the Chicago Park District filed suit Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court against the company that operated concessions at a number of district locations, including GraDistrict filed suit Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court against the company that operated concessions at a number of district locations, including Gradistrict locations, including Grant Park.

For example, in case number 87 C 10746, Gutzmacher v. Public Building Commission, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District ofIllinois, Eastern Division, Senior Federal District Judge James B. Parson ruled on Dec. 4, 1989 that the Public Building Commission was enjoined from discriminating against all forms of religious expression and ordered the Public Building Commission to permit Gutzmacher to erect a nativity scene display during the Christmas season,» added Scholten.

With an even number of justices, while majorities may be more «statistically significant», the 3rd possibility of a tie means the Lower Court prevails but each District can continue doing their own thing.

Lawyers representing 11 artists argued in Federal District Court in Manhattan on Thursday that an effort by the Bloomberg administration to slash the number of artists in parks by more than half violated the First Amendment's free - speech protections.

In the court's majority opinion, Kagan described the two - part analysis utilized by the high court when plaintiffs allege racial gerrymandering as follows: «First, the plaintiff must prove that «race was the predominant factor motivating the legislature's decision to place a significant number of voters within or without a particular district.»

According to a source familiar with the results of these polls, Hanna's numbers improved in the Binghamton and Utica portions of the district — two areas on which his TV ad buys have specifically focused, in part because the district lines changed significantly in the court - drawn congressional map used for the fist time in the 2012 elections.

Schneiderman had previously submitted a friend - of - the - court brief along with 13 other states and the District of Columbia in opposing the Texas law, which could have reduced the number of facilities providing abortion services in the state from 41 to 10.

BTW, the the Supreme Court decision requiring districts to have the same number of people is really an argument based on math.

Lehrer noted that the plan calls for a detention center in each borough except Staten Island, which de Blasio chalked up to the small number of inmates originating there — and to resistance from Councilwoman Debi Rose, whose district covers the courts.

The U.S. District Court is also instructed to decide if the number of signatures required for newly - qualifying parties is Read more»

In the ruling of the court Suit Number HRC / 50/12 among the terms of settlements, point 6 said, the government of Ghana shall ensure that, it takes steps to commence the building of permanent principal offices of the Binduri District Assembly at Binduri in compliance with L.I 2146».

The judge, Valerie E. Caproni of Federal District Court, said a number of jurors» answers suggested that they had had a problem with what they had read about the former speaker.

But the Supreme Court has never resolved whether voting districts should have the same number of people, or the same number of eligible voters.

The district attorney had delegated local courts to handle a rising number of cases in which people are charged with a misdemeanor for circumventing an ignition interlock device.

He said the importance of the district and village heads, particularly in resolving disputes, conflicts and crisis in the communities can not be over-emphasised, adding that they had played vital roles in lowering the number of cases being attended to at police stations and courts.

The 11th circuit remanded the case back to the U.S. District Court, but then the legislature lowered the petition requirement to 1 % of the number of registered voters and the case ended.

The Supreme Court historically has not intervened, as long as districts meet four criteria: they are continuous; they are compact; they contain roughly the same number of people; and they give minority groups a chance to elect their own representatives in accordance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Then, on 22 November, federal judge Amos L. Mazzant of the Eastern District of Texas issued an injunction that put implementation of the new rule on hold until the court could decide lawsuits brought against it by a number of states and employers.

- The subscriberâ $ ™ s name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which FilmOn.com may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) or an agent of suchDistrict Court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which FilmOn.com may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) or an agent of suchdistrict in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which FilmOn.com may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) or an agent of suchdistrict in which FilmOn.com may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) or an agent of such person.

A recent ruling by a federal appeals court may shield school districts in a growing number of states against some types of lawsuits brought against them in federal courts.

If this were true, any number of states, districts, or other stakeholders would have been in court ages ago.

Like a growing number of other school districts, Denver is coming to terms with the end of a court desegregation order that for years profoundly influenced, and often dictated, many of the decisions about education policy made there.

The latter is more likely to occur in school districts such as Fort Wayne, Indiana, that have enough whites left to actually integrate a number of magnet schools and where there has been no strong circuit court decision rejecting the use of race.

The pattern is quite clear in a number of the districts from which the most important Supreme Court decisions arose.

Using a complicated formula approved by the court, the state funds magnet schools that accept students from several different districts (at a minimum there must be two) at a per - pupil rate that increases as the number of districts sending students increases — an attempt to bring central - city minority students and white suburban students together in the same school.

After the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, which limited the voluntary use of race in school assignment plans, 33 the number of schools and districts using socioeconomic integration policies grew rapidly.

In detailing the program's existence, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi found that segregation academies in the state were consistently established in public school districts that had either recently been forced to desegregate by the courts or had recently submitted desegregation plans.48 Appendix B of the court's ruling reveals the percentage of tuition that was covered by the vouchers offered to students at a number of the state's segregation acadeCourt for the Southern District of Mississippi found that segregation academies in the state were consistently established in public school districts that had either recently been forced to desegregate by the courts or had recently submitted desegregation plans.48 Appendix B of the court's ruling reveals the percentage of tuition that was covered by the vouchers offered to students at a number of the state's segregation acadecourt's ruling reveals the percentage of tuition that was covered by the vouchers offered to students at a number of the state's segregation academies.

37 Thanks in part to multiple court orders and strong federal enforcement, school districts began to implement racial integration policies.38 From the 1960s through the 1980s, there was a general growth in school district integration as an increasing number of states and districts heeded Brown's mandate and created bussing policies and magnet schools that joined black and white students across neighborhood boundaries.

Our Supreme Court has directed that districts with disproportionate numbers of children with special needs, children who are economically disadvantaged, and children with limited English language skills be taken into account.

The Court specified courses to be provided and required that ``... districts with disproportionate numbers of disabled students, economically disadvantaged students, and students with limited English language skills...» be taken into account.

«Now, this of course, comes from a school district that gets hundreds of millions of dollars from New Jersey state taxpayers every year because of a failed, and I believe, unconstitutional court requirement that we put disproportionate funds into a small number of school districts,» he said.

It's unclear whether the Houston school district will now negotiate a settlement with the teachers union or end up back in court, but either way, the decision comes at a significant time for the test - based accountability movement, which has faced a number of legal and political challenges over the past several years.

In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court made school integration more difficult when it prohibited the Louisville, Kentucky, and Seattle, Washington, school districts from making racial balance a factor in assigning students to schools in cases where applicant numbers exceeded available seats.1 The plurality opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts called student categorization by race unconstitutional unless it was designed to reverse the effects of explicit rules that segregated students by race.

As a result of commitments made under federal funding or prompting from community demands as well as courts - a number of districts are engaged with their local teachers unions over new evaluation systems that include student performance as an indicator.

[2] Endrew F., a Minor, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Joseph F. and Jennifer F., Petitioner v. Douglas County School District RE-1, Docket Number 15 - 827, Supreme Court of the United States: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-827.htm.

A Harvard professor of education and economics provided the Vergara plaintiffs powerful testimony today when he told the court that schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District have ineffective teachers and a disproportionate number of them are assigned to minority and low income students.

The court stated that LAUSD's use of district - wide «norming ratios», or student - teacher ratios, in determining the number of classrooms to offer to charter schools did not comply with the implementing regulations which require districts to use the facilities inventory at comparison group schools.

«We are pleased that the December 7, 2010 court order has served as a catalyst for change and are glad to see the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) making efforts to meet the terms of Prop. 39 by increasing the number of offers to provide district facilities to charter schools, particularly after years of not complying with the legal requirements of ProposiDistrict (LAUSD) making efforts to meet the terms of Prop. 39 by increasing the number of offers to provide district facilities to charter schools, particularly after years of not complying with the legal requirements of Proposidistrict facilities to charter schools, particularly after years of not complying with the legal requirements of Proposition 39.

The news comes as a large number of ERISA lawsuits are playing out in the district and appellate courts across the U.S., testing whether 403 (b) plan sponsors of major universities have sufficiently exercised their bargaining power or allowed inefficient recordkeeping arrangements to persist over long periods of time.

(a) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on your behalf; (b) a description of the material that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and where the material was located online before it was removed or access to it was disabled; (c) a written statement by you that under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled; and (d) your address, telephone number, and email address; and (e) a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of federal district court for the judicial district in which the address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which the service provider may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification under DMCA 512 subsection (c)(1)(c) or an agent of such person.

The case is McRO Inc. v. Valve Corp., case number 8:13 - cv - 01874, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, their art advisor James Kelly, and a number of expert witnesses, testified in U.S. District Court in Manhattan as the first week in the De Soles» case against the now - defunct Knoedler Gallery came to a... Read More

your name, address and telephone number, and a statement that (i) you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal district court for the judicial district in which such address is located or, if your address is outside of the United States, to any judicial district in which Climate Central may be found, and (ii) you will accept service of process from the claimant who provided Climate Central's designated agent with notification of the alleged infringement in accordance with the DMCA, or an agent of such person.