The model is based on a set
number of dollars per student, along with additional funding determined by certain student characteristics.
Not exact matches
On top
of that, districts also receive 20 percent more in «supplemental»
per - pupil
dollars based on the
number of students identified as disadvantaged.
And although charters enroll only 5 percent
of America's K - 12
students, to the cash - strapped, high - poverty urban districts that have been targeted for charter expansions, that
number represents a shift
of roughly $ 38.7 billion
per year in lost tax
dollars and mass closings
of neighborhood schools.
Ultimately, schools with higher
numbers of at - risk
students receive more
dollars per student.
To mitigate the negative impact
of concentrated poverty, the federal government allocates billions
of dollars to states
per year through Title I, Part A,
of ESEA based on the
number and concentration
of students living in poverty.
Rather, the LCFF defined how the state allocates K - 12
dollars by creating funding targets for a base grant
per student to be provided to all California school districts, adjusted for the
number of students at various grade levels.
This brief authored by Marguerite Roza and Monica Ouijdani provides a state - by - state context by computing the
dollars at stake in marginally raising the
number of students per class.
The district still receives the same
dollar amount
per pupil, yet while
student enrollment has declined, the
number of full - time staff at LAUSD has increased, according to a report commissioned by the district.
WASB lobbyist Dan Rossmiller said public school districts» revenue would be reduced by about $ 4,000
per student each year — resulting in multi-million
dollar revenue losses for school districts with higher
numbers of voucher
students living in the district.