Sentences with phrase «number of patent issues»

One way to get some sense of the amount of innovation happening right now is to look at the number of patents issued for new inventions in the United States.

We evaluated the states on their support for innovation, the number of patents issued to their residents, and the deployment of broadband services.

We evaluate the states on their support for innovation, the number of patents issued to their residents, and the record of high - tech business formation.

Delaware is filled with engineers and scientists — so much so that it ranks second in the nation in the number of patents issued annually.

In a statistic related to the number of civilian scientists and engineers, the Blue Hen State also ranks second in number of patents issued per 1,000 workers.

By 2010, that number had increased tenfold (for comparison, the number of patents issued altogether increased fivefold over the same 30 years).

Not exact matches

One of those metrics is the number of patents filed (and issued) by the company.

A list of the top patent firms that are ranked based on the total number of U.S. utility patents that issued in 2016 where the patent firms...

We compiled a list of the top patent firms, which are ranked based on the total number of U.S. utility patents that issued in 2015 where the...

• The U.S. dominates global science, ranking first worldwide according to papers published in top science journals, patents issued, expenditures made on research and development, and the number of science and engineering doctoral degrees awarded.

Issues are usually resolved in a public hearing which may attract a large number of participants and observers, particularly if the patent is of particular commercial or scientific interest.

«Over the past five years, our faculty has increasingly engaged in entrepreneurial and technology transfer activity — with significant increases in the number of U.S. and foreign patents issued, technology inventions licensed and start - up companies formed,» says UMSOM Dean E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, vice president for medical affairs at the University of Maryland and the John Z. and Akiko K. Bowers Distinguished Professor.

Judging from the firestorm of criticism, «The Heroes of CRISPR» falls short on a number of issues, beginning with this awkward money - tinged paradox: If the CRISPR story (and science in general) is such a beautiful ensemble activity, why is there only one name on the Broad Institute's patent?

There has recently been a number of new patents issued and applied for regarding colloidal silver, silver products and their medical applications.

Biddington's provides a list of patent numbers cross-referenced with the dates they were issued to help in determining the age of antiques and collectibles.

A few days after the 2012 verdict I identified the fact that the jury did not find any of the patents - in - suit to be invalid as the number one issue (if I do it now, some «fanbois» will nevertheless claim that I've changed my stance).

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is issuing «an exponentially growing number of patents,» mostly to high - profile technology companies like those mentioned above, that are developing AI - related algorithms.

We provide and implement strategic advice on a wide range of IP issues, and file more than 5,750 UK, European and international patent and trade mark applications each year; in 2016 we filed the joint highest number of European Patent applications among all European Patent Attorney patent and trade mark applications each year; in 2016 we filed the joint highest number of European Patent applications among all European Patent Attorney Patent applications among all European Patent Attorney Patent Attorney firms.

If one look's at the top plaintiffs by number of distinct patents at issue in open litigation, however, the numbers tell a strikingly different story.

successfully representing clients in a number of IP - related dispute resolutions involving trademark, counterfeit and patent issues in U.S., Asian and EU jurisdictions.

The case presents a number of intriguing issues, among them the meaning of Article X, section 4 of the California Constitution and its application, if any, to lands for which title is derived from a provisional Mexican land grant confirmed by a federal patent issued in the 19th century.

This illustrates how applicants use the continuation process (which allows them to file an unlimited number of new applications based on a previous patent application) to try to get ever broader claims issued.

In recent years, the USPTO has come under increasing scrutiny over the quality of its patent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dPatent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public domain.

The appointment is significant because Lee used to hold the title «Head of Patents and Patent Strategy» at Google, (s goog) where she issued a number of blog posts like this one calling for reform of the patent sPatent Strategy» at Google, (s goog) where she issued a number of blog posts like this one calling for reform of the patent spatent system.

Luxembourg - based patent troll ArrivalStar has sued a number of U.S. transit agencies and other defendants for infringing on patents that probably shouldn't ever have been issued.