The number of patents granted has a compound average growth rate of 3.8 percent since 1991 — about two - thirds the growth rate of new case filings of patent infringement.
Last, since innovation is a big way many people get rich, we looked at
the number of patents granted in each area in 2011, using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
The local economy has grown at a respectable — if not eye - popping — 5.1 percent, and it ranks 6th for
the number of patents granted.
With an economic base that includes high - tech companies and manufacturers, Austin grew more than twice as fast as the average metro area between 2008 and 2011, and it placed an impressive 11th in
the number of patents granted.
Finally, as innovation is a big way many people get rich, we looked at
the number of patents granted in each area in 2011, using data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
As one of the United States» non-coastal innovation centers, this region placed 8th in
the number of patents granted and 13th in economic growth.
Next, we measured the intellectual property output of those workers by
the number of patents granted in 2011.
Last, since innovation is a big way many people get rich no matter where they live, we looked at
the number of patents granted in each county in 2011, based on data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
For Midland County, population 135,000, that means income growth of 35 percent between 2006 and 2011 and more than 12 percent of households earning $ 150,000 or more a year, although
the number of patents granted (18) was distinctly below average.
The cause of this malaise, they argue, is the growing
number of patents granted for basic programming techniques.
Not exact matches
To produce the
numbers, researchers tracked the amount
of money NIH awarded to
grant recipients between 1985 and 2015, as well as publications and
patents related to the awards.
Taking 2010 as the starting point, the government pledges to almost double the representation
of Ph.D. - holders among the population age 25 to 34 by 2020 and increase research employment from 11.8 % to 16 %; raise to 10 % the share
of publicly - funded Spanish papers ranked among the top 5 %
of the most cited publications globally; increase Spain's share
of European Union research funds, including a 90 % increase in the
number of so - called Starting
Grants from the European Research Council; boost the
number of patent applications by 50 %; and raise the national percentage
of innovative companies from 18.6 % to 25 %.
A
number of sites are reporting on the imparting
of this
patent and some
of them erroneously are also reporting that Amazon has been
granted a
patent to sell used ebooks.
With fewer STEM employees and less R&D expenditures than most cities on the list, the San Diego area was still
granted an impressive
number of patents, and boasts a high concentration
of pharmaceutical companies, including Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Arena Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer.
Its growth over time is impressive: This area was
granted three times the
number of patents in 2011 than a decade ago (1,227 in 2001).
Even though Washington, DC, outranked the Bay Area in total
number of STEM employees, San Francisco snagged the top spot on our list for easily outpacing other cities in the generation
of intellectual property (16 %
of all
patents granted in 2011) and for its R&D expenditures.
Later sections
of the
patent describe how the technology could be variously used to temporarily
grant access or limit the
number of uses for a piece
of software.
As South Africa is currently a non-examining country (there are plans to start examining at least pharma
patents), the
number of pharma
patents granted here are higher than in countries having a similar socio - economic background and in which
patents are examined.
technologies and growing
patent field; the
number of Dutch
patents granted via the EPO system grew significantly in 2016 (apparently a new record
number and the strongest growth in 10 years).
Approximately 250
patents have been
granted in 2016 with a FinTech classification, almost double the
number from 2015 and almost triple the
number of granted patents in 2013.
Besides accepting all items on which Oracle and Google had reached agreement in their joint memorandum, the judge
granted Oracle its most important wish: the final decision on the
number of asserted
patent claims to go to jury trial will not be taken now but instead at the final pre-trial conference.
While the main theoretical benefit
of patent protection is increased innovation, some assert a swamped U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has granted an inefficiently large number of patents with negligible innovation
patent protection is increased innovation, some assert a swamped U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office has granted an inefficiently large number of patents with negligible innovation
Patent and Trademark Office has
granted an inefficiently large
number of patents with negligible innovation value.
On March 19, 2018, in Copperhead Industrial Inc v Attorney General
of Canada, 2018 FC 311, the Federal Court
of Canada (Court)
granted an application to vary records relating to
patents numbered 2,614,533 and 2,919,266 (collectively, the Patents) to correct the corporate name of the owner of the P
patents numbered 2,614,533 and 2,919,266 (collectively, the
Patents) to correct the corporate name of the owner of the P
Patents) to correct the corporate name
of the owner
of the
PatentsPatents.
The case presents a
number of intriguing issues, among them the meaning
of Article X, section 4
of the California Constitution and its application, if any, to lands for which title is derived from a provisional Mexican land
grant confirmed by a federal
patent issued in the 19th century.
Although
patent litigation has been on the rise over the past decade, the
number of successful
grants of attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 has not tracked this rise, and remains low.
During the
patent drafting process, there are data analytic tools that can virtually decimate the
number of rejections a company will receive and help ensure a
patent being
granted which is less likely to be litigated.
Samsung has been
granted a
number of new design
patents by the US
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), reports Patently Mobile — and they incl...
In recent years, the USPTO has come under increasing scrutiny over the quality
of its
patent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent examinations.1 The growing push for reform
of the
patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent system is fueled by the rapid rise
of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality
patents.2 Problems with
patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent quality occur when the
Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
Patent Office
grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a
number of these problematic
patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly
patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent where the company asserted a
patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent on their method
of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently
granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall
patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public d
patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public domain.
While you'll find a ton
of third - party game controllers and keyboards for the iPhone these days, a new Apple
patent granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office suggests the company may have been close to launching a number of solutions of it
patent granted by the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office suggests the company may have been close to launching a number of solutions of it
Patent and Trademark Office suggests the company may have been close to launching a
number of solutions
of its own.
It explains how there's been an explosion in the
number of patents applied for,
granted... and being used in litigation.
Samsung has been
granted a
number of new design
patents by the US
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), reports Patently Mobile — and they include everything from a foldable smartphone to a 360 - degree speaker.