Sentences with phrase «number of points when»

Not exact matches

When a number of Ontario funds — at one point, the province was home to 46 labour - sponsored funds — started failing due to a combination of poor investments, falling sales and rising redemptions, he scooped up several and consolidated them into the Canadian Fund.

When consumers reach the breaking point, one expects to see rising numbers of mortgages in arrears.

Using splashy big numbers of capital market debt deals is foolish when those deals are refinancing previous ones at rates hundreds of basis points cheaper.

Healthcare and education are just two examples — but they illustrate a point: if the current system prevents a growing number of people from being able to care for themselves when they are sick, or get the training they need to get a job that supports themselves and their families, they will break the system.

When it comes to the brass - tacks moment of actually facing your negotiating adversary, the advice tends to agree on a small number of practical, basic points.

When calculating the break - even point, use the number of pieces that you would expect to be able to mail consistently after the rollout (this will likely be more than the 500 our client mailed in his test).

Beck, one of the highest - rated conservative radio hosts in the country and founder of TheBlaze, said he's sure «there are those who believe» what they say, but pointed to numbers when asked why so many of his colleagues — many of whom he calls friends — have embraced Trump.

At one point, a number of prominent journalists were congratulating People magazine of all places (which, like Fortune, is owned by Time Inc.) for having an accurate take on the tweet - storm, when compared to more traditional news organizations like CBS News and the Journal.

Wired has called gamification an enemy of great support, and while dissenting opinions often point to cases like Microsoft and the increased productivity they saw when implementing gamification, the numbers don't tell the full story — a lower response time does not mean your team is doing a better job of taking care of customers.

Ultimate Rewards (earned from the Sapphire Reserve / Preferred) can be used at a fixed - value when booking through UltimateRewards.com but can also be worth more when transferring to travel partners like Hyatt or United where you pay a fixed number of points in those programs which are not dependent on the cash cost of that room / flight otherwise.

After a number of years of Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP), the increase in rates stopped for around 11 months until December 2016 when the Federal Reserve promised to increase interest rates by 25 basis points.

In 2011, when congressional Republicans were threatening to allow the government to default on its debts if their policy wish list was not met, Powell met with a number of GOP lawmakers, urging them to reconsider their strategy by pointing out the serious risks involved.

When the program was first conceived in 2005, Amazon presented Bezos with a number of price points, ranging from $ 49 to $ 99 a year.

When you take the high value of Starpoints into account, the sign - up bonus on this card becomes a lot bigger than the sheer number of points would suggest: Earn 25,000 Starpoints ® after you use your new Card to make $ 3,000 in purchases within the first 3 months.

When site owners began creating artificial methods of increasing the number of links pointing to their sites to improve their rankings, the search engines retaliated with link quality measures.

Importantly as it relates to the Fed, these numbers are well above the Fed's expectations of breakeven — a point that seems to be lost on the market when we get even a modestly below Street consensus outcome (which as of this writing is where our numbers stand).

When they've invested in clean power, technology costs have dropped to the point that clean electricity is beating out fossil power on price alone in a growing number of jurisdictions.

And when you try to explain that you are not disagree with God, but that you just understand the Bible differently, then they start accusing you of not believing in inspiration, or not believing the Bible is inerrant, or any number of things which completely miss the entire point.

The real point is that the moving of these holydays of obligation to the following Sunday has had possibly unintended but nevertheless damaging consequences, which outweigh any conceivable gain (I accept that for a very small number of people it does mean that they will be able to celebrate these feasts — in however reduced a way — when previously they couldn't).

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

The sheer number of prophetic statements (300 +) written 600 - 800 years before Christ pointing to Jesus, what He would do, when He would do it and the result of His actions.

The process is simple arithmetic: time the first point, multiply that by the number of «points» announced («I have three things to say about this matter this morning») and one has not only something to anticipate but a fair estimate as to when to expect it.

In God's good time, the gospel takes the world by storm, and there comes a tipping point when the power structures become ours by sheer weight of numbers, as once happened in Europe.

What the editorial does not point out, however, is that the archbishop who proposed and saw through that compromise was none other than William J. Levada, now prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith — the number - two position in the Vatican, and the same position held by Ratzinger when the San Francisco compromise was reached.

It seems to us that there are a number of promising points in this statement of the «new quest» position, and when we develop our own position below it will be seen that we are indebted to it at several places.

According to media reports, R S Sodhi, chairman, Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd, which produces and markets Amul brand milk and dairy products has pointed out that the minimum number of cattle clause is a non-starter and irrelevant today when the whole world negotiates trade in terms of quality.

Same case for Arteta, he looks slow and out of his depth when alongside a faltering number 8 (box to box) A case in point is the game against Dortmund in the first leg.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

That edge continues to grow at every data point when we look at games with three and four times the daily average number of bets.

A good number of Liverpool fans carried out their threat to stage a mass walkout during Saturday's game with strugglers Sunderland, and when they left in the 77th minute, two goals to the good, they likely thought they'd made their point and bagged three points in the process.

When it came time to attend college, he based his decision on a number of factors, including points given for a school's style.

When Griffin was a rookie — and the runaway choice for rookie of the year — he average 20 points, 10 rebounds and 3 assists, which were nearly unprecedented numbers for a newcomer in the league, certainly considering how 20 - 10 players have become an endangered species in today's NBA.

Here's how the Buckeyes are still running their base inside zone play, with a flair that allows them to keep a defense from keying numbers at the point of attack: This gives defensive backs a lot to think about after the snap, when they prefer to just flow to the ball.

Secondly, we are just five points off the top and when one considers that Man City has to meet Chelsea, Man U, Leicester, Spurs while Leicester also has a number of tricky games I can predict that there are still a lot of twists and turns ahead.

But McDonough can only count on one hand the number of times he's heard the Boston crowd cheer an opposing player the way it did when Devin Booker scored 70 points in late March.

And you have to consider the length of a cup competition when more countries join in, at some point everything will have to be re-organized to accommodate the growing number of players and competition and it will be at the cost of the club competitions.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This weekend could be a turning point is Wenger's approval ratings this season when we travel to face the struggling Manchester United of Jose Mourinho, but before we head to Old Trafford I think it is worth taking a look at the Premier League salary numbers printed by the Evening Standard today.

He failed to make an impression at Bournemouth and on the back of one full 90 minutes against a lower division side there is a clamour for him to replace the likes of Ramsay, Xhaka and Elneny who is in my opinion the best defensive midfielder at Arsenal.Wenger is absolutely correct on this occasion when he points that it is up to Wiltshire to stake a claim to a regular midfield berth by stringing together a number of consistently good performances.I sincerely hope he can but please, no more of this hype after a 90 minute shift.

I get that the amount of points we've dropped and the number of injured, first team, players is too much but just losing all hope is not very helpful either.Many will say that this is the reality, and maybe it is, but cant you all just become hopeless deluded dreamers and support the team to win even when it is «practically impossible» Just moaning that we cant win anything, its just shameful for any supporter of any club

Sixth point, yes long range efforts when attempted has produced many goals for a number of clubs.

When we examine more and more lopsided bet games our overall units won drops, however, because the number of past system matches also drops we actually see our ROI rise at each data point.

Not only is it significant that they would move their line to a key number, but we have also observed even more impressive results when there is line movement of at least five points.

That 4 - point line move is massive — especially when you consider that 43 and 44 are two of the four most significant key numbers for betting totals.

Although we typically look for more lopsided betting when we refer to reverse line movement, this 1 - point swing does seem to indicate that sharp money likes Texas Tech in Saturday's matchup — especially since the line crossed the key number of 7.

Getting that extra half - point is particularly important when it involves key numbers, and that point was evident in last week's game of the week analysis.

Underwood pointed out that we had just eleven players in the under 23's last season, under 18's were being forced to play when they shouldn't have been to fill the numbers and the standard of the 11 weren't good, not many are now playing.

So, three away games now and hopefully we'll get the points needed to stay off the bottom of the league and then we can look forward to next season when, given the number of players who have left and the number of trialists who have been on view, it will be a very different looking team.

@Enemy airships, Appreciate your opinion too mate but when you point to Vieira, Petit, Pires, Anelka, etc as French players who have acheived at the club from relative obscurity there are a number of things to consider such as the fact that few of these players done more than 4 seasons at the club where pool, utd and chels were buying quality that have remained and driven their clubs forward.....

When more than one team finishes on a same level of points, the goal difference will be decisive, and if that gives no outcome the number of goals scored determines the final ranking of a team.