Sentences with phrase «number of scientists believe»

In fact, a number of scientists believe that forecast is far too rosy.

A number of scientists believe CBD actually mitigates the famously stoning and paranoia - producing effects of THC by blocking some cannabinoid receptors.

Strength in Numbers Druker and a growing number of scientists believe that amassing and deciphering this torrent of data requires the same open - source ethos that computer programmers have embraced to revolutionize software development.

It is in this aggressive state, Th17 cells promote inflammation rather than mitigate it, a phenomenon that a growing number of scientists believes is a trigger for autoimmune disorders.

Not exact matches

Are you aware that in every study and poll for the past 90 years — the first one done in 1916, the most recent in 2006 — the number of scientists who believe in God (i.e., specifically a God that one can «interact» with) has not budged?

I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

Scientists agree that Down syndrome can be attributed to the father in 5 to 10 percent of cases, and some believe that number may be as high as 20 percent.

Many scientists believe that the aging process is caused by the gradual buildup of a huge number of individually tiny faults — some damage to a DNA strand here, a deranged protein molecule there, and so on.

Organizations like WADA have created a momentum that Rabin believes will cause the number of scientists in antidoping agencies to grow over the next 5 years.

Scientists used to believe that the number of neurons in the brain could decrease (e.g., through trauma or alcohol), but never increase.

Science weighs in: De Vany and other Paleos are in direct opposition to a growing number of scientists and athletes who believe that running long distances can be healthy, and that humans may have evolved doing just that.

CENTRAL COMMAND Scientists believe that sometime in the past 10 million years, paramecia abruptly spliced together two copies of their genome, doubling the number of genes.

Scientists believe that by looking at Mercury, they will learn not only about planets in our solar system, but also about the increasing number of rocky planets being found around other stars.

Scientists believe climate change — the warming of oceans — has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles and other pests to spread to new latitudes.

But once scientists work out the best way to diagnose the condition, some clinicians believe the number of people with this form of «gluten allergy» will dwarf the number with the celiac disease form of «gluten allergy.»

Believe it or not, by monitoring the number of eggs laid, scientists are able to better understand how our genes affect brain function.

An increasing number of top scientists now believe we have passed the tipping point..

There are quite a few scientists out there who see 9 or 10 billion — believe it or not — as a livable number (in terms of food production, at lesat), although many wonder how much «nature» will be left over.

The news service reports, «Scientists believe climate change — the warming of oceans — has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles, and other pests to spread to new latitudes.»

We believe that policymakers, the media, and the public should pay attention to scientific expert credibility and the well - vetted comprehensive assessment reports prepared by a large number of the leading scientists — in particular the new IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, along with the National Academy of Sciences (4 - volume America's Climate Choices report) and the National Climate Assessment forthcoming from the U.S. Global Change Research Program.

Even though I obviously don't have to, since you clearly already know you can't tell what percentage of scientists believe whatever by counting papers, and you clearly already know that the numbers are radically different.

Considering the number of candidates who ran for and got elected to the US Congress whose platform included the position that global warming is a hoax and a conspiracy I find it hard to believe the «dogma problem» is one which can be solved by asking scientists to change their behaviour.

Counting the number of climate scientists that believe in CAGW us mentally challenged, but attractive to authoritarian personality types.

You continue to avoid the issue put to you Vaugh — ie, how can you expect the public to believe climate scientists in general, when they avoid distancing themselves from those of their number found to be cheating?

The 97 percent figure, as Bast and Spencer acknowledge, comes from a series of independent surveys aimed at quantifying the numbers of scientists who believe: a) that climate change is happening; and b) that human activity is to blame.

Oh, and Al, for the record, I believe Tomas doesn't have nearly enough dimensions to characterize the universe of «climate scientists» across understanding of Chaos if he's able to represent it in a single number.

When stats about the number of scientists supporting these likely false theories, it is NOT climate scientists, but often social scientists, so don't believe those numbers.

So, i in 100,000 that gives us a rather staggering number of scientists, since 18,000 scientists signed the Oregon petition, that would make what... 1.8 billion scientists who believe in man made climate change?

The questioner must define scientist establish that there is group of people who are scientists, and that there a sufficient number of them to say that «most» of them believe something.

Near the end of the interview Mörner calls the claim that 97 % of all climate scientists believe global warming is man - made «nonsense» and that the number comes from «unserious surveys».

The number 400 parts per million is symbolic of what many scientists believe to be the inevitable growth of this gas in our atmosphere, Shepherd said.

Or how should she respond if she believe the IPCC has presented a stock view of opinions from a relatively small number of scientists that it chooses to label a consensus?

In 1991, the large coal operation called Western Fuels was very candid in its annual report, and it said it was going to attack mainstream science, it hired three so called greenhouse skeptics, scientists who didn't believe that this was happening, and they mounted a number of public relations campaigns, one in particular is quite interesting, this was a program that called for interviews by these three scientists, radio, newspaper, and TV interviews, in a campaign, and the strategy papers for the campaign said it was designed to quote «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact»....

An amazing number of people still believe that GW is a story made up by scientists with ulterior motives.

Apparently, even among those most disposed to «believe in» human - caused climate change, there are a substantial number of people who think «climate scientists» aren't being entirely straight with them...

He accuses the NYT of playing down the seriousness of global warming by ignoring: «the substantial number of climate scientists who believe that the consensus predictions are much too optimistic, including some of the leading scientists right here [at MIT] who have recently run what they call the most extensive modelling ever done and concluded that it's far worse than anticipated and that their own results are an understatement...» That would be the MIT Climate Research group financed by Exxon, Shell, BP and Total.

the huge number of climate «scientists» who do believe are infact equally bound to find more global warming, or their funding will dry up equally quickly.

Rather, that partial list was provided in order to assist those who want a better understanding that, in fact, there are many more legitimate scientists who are are skeptical of the AGW / climate disaster hypothesis than the number who believe in it.

Also, many scientists believe that CET, being calculated from a number of widely spread locations, in combination with the geographical location of Britain, is demonstrated to be a reasonable - but by no means perfect - proxy for global temperatures, and more notably that of the Northern Hemisphere.

There is a growing number of scientists that believe co2 can not affect the earths climate.

Yet large numbers of scientists have been wrong about many things, and believed many things that turned out to be false.

The reasons for that are many: the timid language of scientific probabilities, which the climatologist James Hansen once called «scientific reticence» in a paper chastising scientists for editing their own observations so conscientiously that they failed to communicate how dire the threat really was; the fact that the country is dominated by a group of technocrats who believe any problem can be solved and an opposing culture that doesn't even see warming as a problem worth addressing; the way that climate denialism has made scientists even more cautious in offering speculative warnings; the simple speed of change and, also, its slowness, such that we are only seeing effects now of warming from decades past; our uncertainty about uncertainty, which the climate writer Naomi Oreskes in particular has suggested stops us from preparing as though anything worse than a median outcome were even possible; the way we assume climate change will hit hardest elsewhere, not everywhere; the smallness (two degrees) and largeness (1.8 trillion tons) and abstractness (400 parts per million) of the numbers; the discomfort of considering a problem that is very difficult, if not impossible, to solve; the altogether incomprehensible scale of that problem, which amounts to the prospect of our own annihilation; simple fear.

Scientists believe climate change — the warming of oceans — has allowed some of the almost 2,000 jellyfish species to expand their ranges, appear earlier in the year and increase overall numbers, much as warming has helped ticks, bark beetles and other pests to spread to new latitudes.

In my experience, when scientists have a theory which they believe to have a lot of predictive power and only a few obvious numbers of practical importance to test it against, they look intensely for less obvious practically unimportant observations to test it against.

Scientists around the globe say that global warming is real but why are some Americans reluctant to believe this despite tantamount number of studies and evidence?

In addition, the survey found that nearly three out of every four federal scientists (74 %) believe the sharing of scientific findings has become too restricted in the past five years and that nearly the same number (71 %) believe political interference has compromised Canada's ability to develop policy, law and programs based on scientific evidence.»