Sentences with phrase «number of scientists support»

When stats about the number of scientists supporting these likely false theories, it is NOT climate scientists, but often social scientists, so don't believe those numbers.

Not exact matches

Yeah, but they are biased in that they seek to prove everything through the lens of evolution so they often look in the wrong direction, and a large number of scientists are in fact Christians My point is this, if you take the time to look for the evidence and be open to it, you will find that there is a respectable amount of evidence to support the fact that there is a god and that he is the God of Christianity

It also employs a large number of technicians and support scientists with bachelor's and master's degrees in science, as well as undergraduate students.

The plan for science and technology proposed by the Obama campaign, for example, calls for «comprehensive immigration reform that improves our visa programs to attract some of the world's most talented people to America» and supports an increase in the number of foreign scientists and technical people permitted to study, work, and stay in the United States.

Liberals such as former secretary of labor Robert Reich and conservatives such as Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee support the approach, as do a growing number of climate scientists and economists.

There are a number of eminent marine mammal scientists who either don't buy it at all or say there is too little data to support the sweeping claims.

This study was supported by Norma C. and Albert I. Geller via the Gynecological Cancer Translation Research Program at the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, and grants from The Mary Kay Foundation (to A.D. and R.X.), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under the NIH Director's New Innovator award number DP2HD084068 (to R.X.), The National Cancer Institute award number R011CA197780 - 01A1 (to A.D.), and The Young Scientist Foundation (A.D.Of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under the NIH Director's New Innovator award number DP2HD084068 (to R.X.), The National Cancer Institute award number R011CA197780 - 01A1 (to A.D.), and The Young Scientist Foundation (A.D.of the National Institutes of Health under the NIH Director's New Innovator award number DP2HD084068 (to R.X.), The National Cancer Institute award number R011CA197780 - 01A1 (to A.D.), and The Young Scientist Foundation (A.D.of Health under the NIH Director's New Innovator award number DP2HD084068 (to R.X.), The National Cancer Institute award number R011CA197780 - 01A1 (to A.D.), and The Young Scientist Foundation (A.D.).

A growing number of funders are paying author fees on behalf of the scientists they support, but this approach is still far from becoming mainstream.

Gordon de Brouwer, secretary of the federal Environment Department, which oversees AAD, told scientists and support staff on 8 April that the division, based near Hobart, Tasmania, also faces an unspecified number of «voluntary» job losses.

Now, however, physicists with Daya Bay report data that support a much simpler explanation: Scientists are merely overestimating the number of neutrinos born from the various radioactive nuclei produced in the fission of one component of standard nuclear fuel.

Partial travel support is available for a limited number of early career scientists from the developing world and Europe.

This research was supported by the Vanderbilt Office of Clinical and Translational Scientist Development, the Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Research Scholars Program and the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers AG046379 and AG045735).

Along with Woo's usual elaborately choreographed action scenes, Face / Off features a number of notable supporting performances, including Joan Allen as Archer's wife, Colm Feore and C.C.H. Pounder as FBI scientists, and Gina Gershon as Troy's loyal but long - suffering girlfriend.

Malcolm Gladwell, a writer for the New Yorker, has become wildly successful mining the findings of social scientists to support ideas or hypotheses that it turns out have been of interest to great numbers of readers.

Their dedicated work is supported by an incredible number of people; including our staff and volunteers, as well as independent scientists, animal hospitals and all of our dedicated supporters.

A number of climate scientists, conservationists and environmentalists urged the Governor and the Legislature to amend the legislation, and warned that «unless they are amended to support nuclear power as well, they could make the situation worse.»

For example, the small number of scientists discussing «cooling» amounted to a hypothesis that was not supported by the science.

It supports a very large number of qualified scientists in many research institutions, both in the government and in universities and research labs.

Surveys and signed petitions show they enjoy extensive support by climate scientists as well as the larger number of scientists who are expert on some parts of the climate change puzzle.

«When I joined the American Physical Society sixty - seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood... the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence... How different it is now... the money flood has become the raison d'etre of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs... It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave.

I have found what I did suspect: the large number of scientists working in this huge, growing field, supported by grants, do indeed feel that they should be the only biased participants.

The Union of Concerned Scientists supports continued federal incentives for research for a limited number of full - scale integrated CCS demonstration projects, alongside private sector efforts.

I could point to many journal articles supporting my stance, or climate scientists that share my opinion, or give you any number of criticisms of pro-CAGW arguments that you could then weigh yourself for validity (not that you've proven able or willing to do so, leading me to «trust» you wouldn't want to do that here).

Those supporting emissions trading — and there are many who don't, including a large number of climate scientists — say the profit motive will inspire entrepreneurs to come up with ideas for capturing and banking carbon dioxide.

That 40 % number is a falsehood - there is about a 98 % consensus of all scientists who study this phenomena that anthropogenic climate change is a reality, and every major scientific institution in the world supports the conclusion of man caused global warming.

As for the number of scientists actually doing climate science, properly defined, even if «only» 620 appear as actual authors of the sections in IPCC - 2007 science report, this work is supported by well over 2,000 climate scientists whose work in the peer - reviewed literature is referenced in that document.

Using a dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data, Anderegg et al. (2010) found a similar result to Doran and Zimmerman, that between 97 % to 98 % of climate experts support the consensus, and that the average number of publications by the «skeptics» is around half the number by scientists convinced by the evidence of human - caused global warming.

So the question arises: of the respondent group (atmospheric scientists and meteorologists) is there a greater number who are being paid to support or to rebut the IPCC GAGW premise?

But the documents suggest Peabody supported dozens of groups engaged in blocking environmental regulations in addition to a number of contrarian scientists who together have obstructed US and global action on climate change.

It specifically notes the financial support provided by Big Oil to a number of Palin's «scientists».

Certainly that is one good question for reporters and investigators to ask, but a better question would be to ask just exactly how and why Connolley became a reviewer and whether this turn of events was what lead to the number of people who contributed to Rado's complaint, and the type of material within the complaint which supposedly support the accusation about «industry - corrupted» skeptic scientists.

If something has any credibility to it, I think it will gain support and the media can't ignore it once it has support from a number of scientists.

This letter follows a number of international letters in recent years (from faith leaders, scientists, Nobel laureates, company founders and others) addressed either to the UN or the global community in support of actions to prevent the development of autonomous weapons.