«Irrespective of the result of this appeal, I have no doubt that... a substantial
number of vulnerable children are still suffering from a failure of co-ordination between these two departments within a number of English local authorities.
Not exact matches
I interviewed dozens
of experts, social workers, lawyers and asylum - seeking teenagers and found that, far from being welcomed to safety,
vulnerable children face an overwhelming
number of obstacles.
The elderly are especially
vulnerable to malnutrition caused by SIBO, as are the increasing
numbers of children born with autism and other brain development disorders.
The dwindling
number of school places, the increasing size
of classes and the continued budget cuts that are stretching resources to breaking point are all important factors which limit our teachers» ability to provide the proper safeguarding for
vulnerable children.
In response to the publication
of the SEN Code
of Practice for parliamentary approval by the Department for Education, the AEP has stressed that an uncertain funding future for the initial training
of the educational psychology workforce and the ever increasing demand for educational psychologists» posts will mean that there will be an insufficient
number of educational psychologists supporting local authorities and schools in future, which could put the wellbeing
of vulnerable children and young people across the country at risk.
Schools use the PDG in a
number of different ways, including nurture groups for
children who may be socially and emotionally
vulnerable, out -
of - hours school learning, on - site multi-agency support and better tracking
of pupils as they progress through school.
Without increased funding schools will have to continue cutting the
number of support staff, which leaves
vulnerable children with less support and further increases teachers» workloads.»
There are a range
of critical issues, such as: the implementation
of the reauthorized ESEA (now called The Every Student Succeeds Act) which includes new flexibility for states in designing state standards and accountability systems as well as a hard cap on the
number of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities taking alternate assessments on alternate standards; regulations on disproportionate identification
of minority students to special education; and, the goal to transition more disadvantaged students into college and careers that will have a significant impact on some
of the most
vulnerable children.
Oral language skills blossom during the preschool years, which means that they are also very
vulnerable and in need
of stimulation during this time, as a
number of major organizations involved in the education
of young
children have recognized.
«If one school or a
number of schools in a locality opt out
of the fair access process it can disrupt the entire ecosystem and leave many
children very
vulnerable,» she said.
The Lancet medical journal has had two special editions on the subject during the past year, which show that
children, the most
vulnerable in any community, are already dying in large
numbers in poor countries as a result
of a warming world.
HectorK, «The Lancet medical journal has had two special editions on the subject during the past year, which show that
children, the most
vulnerable in any community, are already dying in large
numbers in poor countries as a result
of a warming world.»
In San Bernardino County, although we have seen a
number of recent dog attacks involving
children, it is important to remember that adults are equally
vulnerable.
It is hoped that this approach can be adopted nationally, resulting in an increase in the
number of vulnerable families being comprehensively supported with their
children able safely to remain with them, as well as savings to the public purse.
This means that a significant change in patterns around divorce raises some red flags — the lack
of closure in marital conflicts, the impact on
children who are most
vulnerable to instability, and the
number of couples who may continue to share space when their best interests and even their personal safety lie elsewhere.
These are because young
children are more
vulnerable to serious diseases.Also, they must be protected before starting school, where they will be exposed to a large
number of germs.
«To have a greater impact on reducing the overall
number of suicide attempts that occur yearly in the United States, prevention and treatment efforts need to target groups that have been accurately identified as a risk... professionals should recognize that
children who experience parental divorce might be more
vulnerable for suicide attempt than those from intact households,» the study states.
The literature on these placements suggests that although kinship families are much more
vulnerable than unrelated foster families,
children living with relatives are more likely to remain in the same placement and to have longer durations in foster care.78 Given the large
numbers of kinship placements occurring across the United States, it would behoove the
child welfare system to provide supportive services to these
vulnerable kinship families to enable them to provide quality care to the
children in their care (see the article by Geen in this journal issue).
Children in foster care are particularly
vulnerable to detrimental outcomes, as they often come into state care due to their exposure to maltreatment, family instability, and a
number of other risk factors that compromise their healthy development.
By school entry, 43 — 47 %
of Aboriginal
children have markers of developmental vulnerability.12, 13 In 2009, the first - ever national census of childhood development at school entry showed that Aboriginal children were 2 — 3 times more likely than non-Aboriginal children to be developmentally vulnerable — defined as an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) score below the 10th centile — on one or more domains.14 The Longitudinal Survey of Australian Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children have markers
of developmental vulnerability.12, 13 In 2009, the first - ever national census
of childhood development at school entry showed that Aboriginal
children were 2 — 3 times more likely than non-Aboriginal children to be developmentally vulnerable — defined as an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) score below the 10th centile — on one or more domains.14 The Longitudinal Survey of Australian Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children were 2 — 3 times more likely than non-Aboriginal
children to be developmentally vulnerable — defined as an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) score below the 10th centile — on one or more domains.14 The Longitudinal Survey of Australian Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children to be developmentally
vulnerable — defined as an Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) score below the 10th centile — on one or more domains.14 The Longitudinal Survey
of Australian
Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
Children reported similar disparities for cognitive outcomes among Aboriginal
children aged 4 — 5 years, although the number of Aboriginal children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children aged 4 — 5 years, although the
number of Aboriginal
children was very small and not representative of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth of empirical research that identifies the drivers of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children was very small and not representative
of the Aboriginal population.15 There is currently a dearth
of empirical research that identifies the drivers
of positive early childhood health and development in Aboriginal
children, or characterises vulnerable developmental traje
children, or characterises
vulnerable developmental trajectories.
(1989) noted that large
numbers of children attempt to align with one or both angry parents which simultaneously helps the
child feel more important and more
vulnerable.