Sentences with phrase «number people speak»

Not exact matches

Some people are saying they fibbed about the number of languages they speak, while others are saying they really aren't the team players they pretended to be.

When I came up with the idea for my first book, 101 Ways to Market Your Business, I spoke to a number of people in marketing about it.

While we may speak of IQ in terms of high and low, EI rather encompasses a varying number (depending on whom you ask) of diverse but complementary aspects that together can determine a person's overall emotional intelligence.

It is an online community of gamers that are upset that people are speaking out against the objectified way women are portrayed in gaming culture on - screen, and the community has also provided some resistance to the growing number of female gamers.

Over the past year I've spoken with a number of incredibly successful people.

CFO's are often challenged with speaking like a real person about and to real people because their lives revolve around numbers.

Stone warns that people should not give out Social Security numbers or bank account information over the phone unless they are certain about who they are speaking with.

Ryan Murphy is on solid ground today, even if its success hasn't curbed the number of people calling the company asking to speak to «Ryan Murphy,» only to find two women in charge.

«A number of agents I spoke to said last year that they weren't selling as hard, they weren't working as hard, and they weren't meeting with people as much as they used to because of their confusion and uncertainty over what might happen with the DOL,» he explained.

Whenever I speak to people about SEO, the number one question that I get asked is, «What's the most important -LSB-...]

The number of users that use this service around the world speaks for itself: 18 million people.

When speaking with customer support, the person on the other end of the line didn't quite seem to know what I was talking about, and since there isn't a media phone number listed on the website, I can't seem to verify this refund.

I've been friends with the people at the Foundation for Economic Education since I first discovered them in college and over the past few years have spoken at a number of their summer seminars, helped them improve some of their marketing, and did some photography for them one summer.

A number of people that have written to respond to this article have spoken of the interpretation of the Bible, which is the number one problem in this present world as the Bible itself teaches us that no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Peter 1:20).

Just to mention, I know of a number of people (Christians) that went to Pentecostal worship services and became ex-Christians after the rolling on the floor and speaking in tongues frenzy.

At a point in Tietjen's account where he speaks of a number of people rallying to his cause, he includes this footnote:

What we meant to model was the sending of one of our number to be a foreign missionary — to learn a new language, to understand a local culture, to sacrifice the amenities of affluence and to live knowing that he or she is always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here as lifetime local missionaries, learning to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture, sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living as a «watched» person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it sees the real thing on display.

At the same time it was estimated that there yet remained five hundred to a thousand other language groups spoken by substantial numbers of people into which translations should be made, and many of them will be.

A growing number of people recognize that «truth» is related to the person who thinks and speaks.

When people speak of «permitting the lesser evil» they may have one or other of a number of different comparisons in mind, either between greater or lesser moral evils, or between what they think of as greater or lesser «pre-moral» evils.

According to many studies, public speaking is the number one fear of people who speak normally.

Furthermore, they must be avoided if we are to speak to the way in which increasing numbers of people today understand their humanity.

If we refer back to our three ways of using a word, to speak of healthy dogs and people is number one above, the normal use.

One of the biggest frustrations that I encounter when speaking with people about Jason's deconversion is that a number of people often come to me with ideas on how they can help rather than asking what would be helpful.

Tana December 7, 2011 5:29 pm ------ Tana, I can't speak for Sam, but for me and my experiences, that is before I became a Christian at 33, then later became a pastor at 50, and now a pastor for 14 years, I have seen and see now untold numbers of people who hang on to the victimhood with a tight grip.

Sister Mary Corita chose to answer these questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God], for grace to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace to quarrel with the worship of success and power... to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who went forth from this place longing only for those things for which Thou dost make us long, [those] for whom the complexity of the issues only served to renew their zeal to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain by sharing it; and [those] who were always willing to risk something big for something good... O God, take our minds and think through them, take our lips and speak through them.

It's been pointed out that a surprising number of hymns speak in the first person as God.

So I started to number that question, too, and I deferred speaking with people until they had completed it.

But Rogers says, in speaking of communes: «There are a number of paternal persons, men and women, who take a hand in [the child's upbringing]....

Bob, georgia, and ttwp, nowhere in the so called OT, (the obvious truth book), and truly was named by YHWH, «the book of remembrance» in Malachi 3v16, does it say jesus, nor does it tell of his story, and in all of those scriptures in the chapters that are in Isaiah 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, are speaking of the servant, the elect, from the «seed» of David, as the future prophecy in Jeremiah 23 vs.1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs.14 - 21 of the righteous BRANCH, named «The Lord (YHWH) Our Righteousness», and not just one person here, and again there is no name of jc here either, and this is taught to us, in Jeremiah 33 vs. 22 that there will be a great number of David's seed to be on the throne.

«Again, the corrupt and unsound form of speaking in the plural number to a single person, you to one, instead of thou, contrary to the pure, plain, and single language of truth, thou to one, and you to more than one, which had always been used by God to men, and men to God, as well as one to another, from the oldest record of time till corrupt men, for corrupt ends, in later and corrupt times, to flatter, fawn, and work upon the corrupt nature in men, brought in that false and senseless way of speaking you to one, which has since corrupted the modern languages, and hath greatly debased the spirits and depraved the manners of men; — this evil custom I had been as forward in as others, and this I was now called out of and required to cease from.

A number of influential people spoke out.

@ Sane Person — Well, maybe they don't speak for all... but I've heard a number of pretty prominent atheists put it pretty much like that (OK, yea, with some added big words meant to confuse and cloak that basic message).

Moreover, each human being must be constituted of many millions of these «unit - happenings» or «experiences,» because Hartshorne affirms that persons have about ten new ones per second and that they fit together so smoothly that the transitions between them go largely unnoticed.12 And inasmuch as everything in the universe is composed of similar unit - experiences or actual entities, the number of them that occurs at any given instant of time (if we may legitimately speak of such instants) must be stupendously large.

Second, and more crucially, that secular objection (as in the hippie saying I heard so often in my youth: «Don't lay your value trips on me, man») rests on the assumption that someone can authentically sexually donate himself to another without making a definitive commitment to the other person; that is, he can «hedge his bets,» so speak, without paying the consequences ¯ a foolish assumption given the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the divorce rates, the numbers of children born out of wedlock, and so forth.

How can anyone actually believe that the right, in its current form, isn't speaking to and supported by a large number of people?

Anthony Benezet wrote and spoke against it and persuaded a number of outstanding people to oppose slaveholding.

Even in this more secular age, people in the western world tacitly, even if unintentionally, acknowledge Christian faith when they refer to a particular year by number, since the words Anno Domini, strictly speaking, are always implied.

Then imagine that a number of Chinese - speaking people outside the room are able to present him with bundles of ideograms which the man must combine together according to the rules provided.

I'm truly not a big fan of this social media, personally speaking, and I'm only friends with a minimum number of people, 99 % of which are family or close friends.

«Whether people like it or not, the numbers speak for themselves.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Spent the last hour at work today speaking to our head of office devising an email to stop people going for number 1s AND 2s on the floor of the work toilets.

There is always live help available on the website and freephone numbers for UK and Irish customers who would prefer to speak to support in person.

Jennifer is the first person I've spoken with there who actually asked for my phone number and said she would call me to let me know how this is resolved (which should take up to 15 business days).

I have been told child number 2 doesn't learn to speak as soon as the first, simple reason being there are more people around to answer to the grunts and points that they give, there is no need for words.

When I called the line, I did give my number so the person with some lactation support training could get back to me — although I had to specifically insist that I needed to speak with someone who could provide breastfeeding support.

It is a testament to an engaged community that a number of decisions made in Arlington Heights, Palatine and Buffalo Grove this year were impacted — to say the least — by the ordinary people who spoke.

«What I've found fascinating in the last week of this process has been the numbers of people — probably not in the Labour party, may not even be Labour voters — who have written to me to say thanks very much for speaking up against austerity and for speaking up against inequality in society,» he says.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror, Mr Brown said: «One thing that worries me most is the number of shops and off - licences selling to people under 18.