Sentences with phrase «number the score considers»

While good to know, this won't necessarily tell you what the potential impact of the next inquiry will be if you don't also know how many inquiries the score is counting, especially since the number of inquiries you see is not always the same number the score considers.

Not exact matches

Considered the worst cities on our list to find a dream job, they scored lower on the factors that were taken into consideration: unemployment rate, average weekly wage and number of establishments.

Considering that Zlatan wore No. 10 with Paris Saint - Germain, it was reasonable to suspect that there might be a clash between the strong - willed scoring machine and Man United captain Wayne Rooney for the number they've both shared at their respective clubs over the years.

Palermo pulled off similar s *** in the pastore deal... they overrated their own player... spoke about interest from number of clubs and ended up selling him at a HUGELY inflated price And paying 40mil euros for a young player who scored 17 goals in a league where even gervinho is considered a star is beyond ridiculous.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I think it's 22 goals in 20 games total, considering he has been scoring about one in two over the last number of years this could be a sign of him improving.

However, both «8» and «9» are considered dead numbers since there are very few games that finish with a scoring difference in that range.

Also, consider this: In 2011 as the primary backup to Mark Ingram, Richardson rushed for 700 yards and six scores on just 112 carries — numbers eerily similar to Lacy.

Even Francis Jeffers could return and score goals for the Gunners now, considering the number of chances they create.

Part of this problem could be considered to be that the most used central midfield pairing, Lucas Leiva and Charlie Adam, aren't particularly dynamic nor inclined to get on the end of crosses (of which Liverpool have had more, per game, than any other team in the league apart from Wolves — more of which, will be discussed later), so this only leaves a certain number of players who will be able to get into the box in the more rigid 4 -4-2 utilised for most of this season. Inspite of this, however, 58 % of Liverpool's goals have come from inside the 18 yard box, the highest in the league so far this season in terms of percentage of goals scored by each individual team, suggesting that this is the best avenue of attack for Liverpool, so the question has to be: why have Liverpool only managed to score 14 times, the 10th lowest amount of goals in the league?

Test scores for third through eighth graders were released Wednesday and they show a dramatic drop in the number of New York state students who are considered proficient in math and English.

Reading and considering such testimony would undoubtedly take more time and effort and could feel less «scientific» than looking at numbers, whether test scores, GPAs, or tallies of publications.

After adjusting for maternal IQ and education, characteristics of the home environment, school district, and number of siblings, the children who were exposed to greater than 5 parts arsenic per billion of household well water (WAs ≥ 5 μg / L) showed reductions in Full Scale, Working Memory, Perceptual Reasoning and Verbal Comprehension scores, losses of 5 - 6 points, considered a significant decline, that may translate to problems in school, according to Gail Wasserman, PhD, professor of Medical Psychology in the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia, and the study's first author.

«Scoring Miyazaki» (7:18) considers the work of Miyazaki's regular composer Joe Hisaishi, who shares some reflections on his creative process for a number of their collaborations, including My Neighbor Totoro, Kiki's Delivery Service, Ponyo, and, naturally, Castle in the Sky.

There are a number of interesting sonic elements in the film — the propulsive bass, the blanketing textures of Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard's score, the crispness of artillery fire, and the supple sounds of Batman's cape — but the vocal track stands out as a real accomplishment for reasons that you probably did not even consider.

When evaluations of national performance consider statistical significance, the U.S. scores are often not as disappointing as the raw numbers may make them seem.

The Gold Star rating was determined by considering each program's total score along with the number of recommendations submitted for the program and the tenor of reviewers» comments about it.

Market - oriented education reform refers to a series of initiatives that include educator evaluations based in large part on student standardized test scores, the closure of schools that are considered failing or underenrolled, and an increase in the number of charter schools, many of which are operated by for - profit companies.

The lesson of the NRC - NAEd report is that even though value - added methodologies offer a number of advantages over other approaches that consider test - score data in a vacuum, policymakers need to move carefully in adopting any approach — value - added or otherwise — in making important decisions about individual teachers.

Thus, if a teacher has a number of students who have lower reading scores, they might want to consider including more matching questions on their assessments.

In DC, IMPACT asks evaluators to consider a teachers» expertise in a number of different domains, using test scores as one indicator of teacher effectiveness.

Z.E.C.A., located in Jacksonville, is experiencing a significant financial crisis that prompted CSAB chair Quigley to call their situation «a perfect storm» after considering the school's very poor test scores and low student enrollment numbers along with their financial issues.

In the US, variations in school quality seem to explain no more than 33 % of the discrepancies in test score performance; this number, which has been around since 1966, considers the influence of a student's classmates to be a school - based factor (it arguably isn't) and thus seems to be a conservative upper bound.

Folks with scores under 600 are considered bad credit risks, but non-traditional lenders look for proof of job longevity and salary, proof of residency, proof of an active bank account, a social security number, and government issued identification.

The total balance owed, the number of accounts with balances, and how much available credit you're using are some of the specific factors your FICO score considers.

But 720 is still a key number: In the consumer finance game, that is considered a «very good» score.

This may sound paradoxical, but companies that formulate and sell credit scores consider an abnormal (whatever that may mean) number of credit inquiries, particularly over a relatively short time period, to be an indicator of higher - than - average credit risk.

An important point that some consumers overlook when considering multiple credit cards is that your credit score hinges on your credit utilization ratio, not the number of cards.

Best Egg considers a number of things when deciding whether to lend to you including the information on your loan application, information from credit bureaus, your credit score, and your debt - to - income ratio.

If the debt has done a number on your credit score, consider hiring a reputable credit repair agency to help you raise your score.

One strategy to consider is to refinance either your mortgage or your home loan, use the savings to make a number of payments while your credit score bounces back, then leverage the credit you have built up to refinance the other.

One of the factors which FICO and other credit scoring models consider is your number of accounts with balances.

A score of 690 — 720 is considered «good,» 630 — 690 is «fair» and anything below 630 is considered «poor,» though MyFico.com advises that no specific number makes an individual a «good» or «bad» customer:

Lenders look at a number of things, when considering your mortgage application, including your credit score, income and debt levels.

When considering whether to grant a loan, peer - to - peer lenders such as Prosper and Lending Club will look to see that you have a credit score above a certain number: For example:

If your credit score is below that number and if you've missed several bill payments or been late on your payments, you're not considered a well qualified borrower.

Given the number of uncertainties involved in trying to estimate a sustainable level of retirement spending — how the markets will perform, how long you'll live, what your actual expenses will be (although on that score, doing a retirement budget can help)-- you might also consider turning a portion of your nest egg into income assured to last no matter how long you live and regardless of how the markets fare by investing in an immediate annuity or longevity annuity.

If your credit score is below a certain number — usually 549 or lower — then you will likely be considered to have bad credit.

As for credit score, there is no pass or fail number, due to the number of factors considered, including assets, debt - to - income ratio and residual income; however, most lender will prefer to see a credit score of at least 620.

Since there are a few different credit score systems, the best way to know whether your credit is considered bad is to see how close your credit score is to the first hundred numbers of the credit score system.

Anything above this number will be considered a jumbo loan and scores will have to be much higher than what used to be a 660 - 680.

And a credit report would contain different elements that an employer could consider like this debt is bankruptcy, this is divorce, as opposed to a credit score is just a number.

You have an excellent FICO score right now, as numbers in the mid-700s and above are considered to be in the highest category.

When a consumer's score dips below that number they are considered risky.

Enigmatic score may tell lenders — It's a number that lenders may consider when deciding whether or not to lend you money, but it isn't the well - known credit score.

If trying to compare by the numbers, those whose credit would be considered «poor» under the VantageScore 3.0 model will most likely fall under «fair» under the FICO Score 8 model.

Unfortunately the authors do not discuss how many animals actually had a BCS in their record for each group - considering numbers for each disease were in the single digits and not all had BCS scores, I would call their conclusion into doubt without more information.

But I do want to point out that I've been doing this for about 3 years now, with what most people would consider a significant number of credit cards, and I just checked my credit score and it has INCREASED by 13 points since I started!!

We might consider a set number of turns in which the intent is to maximise a shared score, or simply working on the basis of the economic engine part without a major victory point component.

Whilst promotions for the game will help sales, there are a number of other factors that need to be considered, the first being review scores.