Your lengthy response to my piece «Obama Needs to Give a Climate Speech - ASAP» contains
numerous errors of fact and interpretation.
Not exact matches
Anecdotally, I know for a
fact that
numerous attempts have been made, not to convince him that there is a God, but merely to apprise him
of the elementary
errors that throng his arguments.
Now, a new monograph, «Beyond Partisan Politics: A Response to the Carnegie Report on School Choice,» accuses the Carnegie study
of «
numerous outright
errors of fact, as well as
errors of omission and interpretation that seriously undermine its credibility.»
You may find
numerous errors such as repetitions or illogical presentations
of the
facts.
Unfortunately, there are
numerous punctuation and word usage
errors, leading us to believe that the claim
of using only U.S. and UK writers may not in
fact be fully true.
For example, a study by the Consumer Federation
of America and National Credit Reporting Association documented
numerous serious
errors and inconsistencies, such as the
fact that 29 %
of credit files had a difference
of 50 points or more between the highest and lowest credit scores from the three nationwide credit bureaus (i.e., Equifax, Experian and TransUnion).37 Members
of Congress cited studies from U.S PIRG showing
errors in 70 %
of credit reports,
of which 25 % were serious enough to cause a denial
of credit.38
It presents no scientifically acceptable hypothesis to explain «hiatus,» has
numerous errors and misstatements
of fact, and ignores the most direct explanation that Ferenc Miskolczi published in 2007, namely that there is no greenhouse effect at all.
The letter makes
numerous errors of scientific
fact.