documented and ruled in a British court of law that Al Gore's film and inconvenient truth contained
numerous factual errors.
You said originally Tamino's review has «
numerous factual errors and misrepresentations».
Sorry to be so blunt, Judith, but when you make a claim that Tamino's review has «
numerous factual errors and misrepresentations» it behooves you to actually list the errors and defend your point of view.
First, in # 74 she claims that Tamino's review has «
numerous factual errors and misrepresentations, failure to address many of the main points of the book».
To repeat, Judith Curry first states that Tamino's review contains (IN HER OWN WORDS) «
numerous factual errors and misrepresentations, failure to address many of the main points of the book».
«cons:
numerous factual errors and misrepresentations, failure to address many of the main points of the book»
Wilson's book contains
numerous factual errors, such as «if Darwin were correct, there would be hundreds, thousands of examples» of transitional fossils.
Not exact matches
The book of Mormon especially has
numerous historical and
factual errors.
There are
numerous yet - to - be-corrected
factual errors in Saltz's post.