Sentences with phrase «obesity paradox»

«Obesity paradox in survival from sepsis.»

Although Ribeiro's research into kidney fat is too new to have borne results, his earlier work on prostate cancer could hold some clues about the kidney - cancer obesity paradox.

However, the researchers conclude that their findings do not support reevaluating guidelines in pursuit of a potential obesity paradox.

Among those with prevalent disease, the researchers observed a strong and significant obesity paradox, replicating earlier findings.

To understand the obesity paradox in kidney cancer, some researchers are now homing in on the fat that surrounds the kidneys.

Most people studying the obesity paradox in kidney cancer think that changing medical guidelines to endorse obesity or weight gain rather than weight reduction is misguided.

«The real question is whether the obesity paradox is a true biological phenomenon,» says Martin Lajous, an epidemiologist at Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, who was not involved in the study.

Determining whether the obesity paradox is valid in kidney cancer matters for clinicians who treat and manage the disease.

In other studies, obesity has been associated with a decreased risk of early death; however, follow - up studies suggest that this «obesity paradox» may be explained by unintentional weight loss in the few years preceding death, rather than a truly protective effect of obesity.

That counter-intuitive finding added to a growing body of evidence for an obesity paradox in kidney cancer.

When Hakimi, Furberg and colleagues started researching the obesity paradox in kidney cancer, they looked into all the ways that their approach might skew the results.

Unlike other diseases that have an obesity paradox, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, cancer can trigger unexpected weight loss well before the disease's clinical symptoms appear, says Hailey Banack, an epidemiologist who recently completed her doctorate at McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

Rather than ratchet up the competition, the various players investigating the obesity paradox in kidney cancer did something unusual in the cutthroat world of scientific research: they decided to collaborate.

But even if researchers such as Ribeiro find more precise ways to measure fatness, critics of the obesity paradox contend that there is a more pervasive bias in how patients are selected for such studies.

This would suggest that fat offers no survival advantage — and that the obesity paradox does not exist in prostate cancer.

Indeed, attendees at same session at the Orlando symposium could also find a poster purporting to discredit the obesity paradox.

But critics of the obesity paradox see that single BMI measurement as problematic, especially when it comes to cancer.

On the other side of the world, Furberg and kidney specialist Ari Hakimi, also at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, came across the obesity paradox in their research.

However, a new study by NYU College of Global Public Health and the University of Michigan finds that this «obesity paradox» is not present among people with new cases of cardiovascular disease.

However, despite the plausibility of these hypotheses, we did not find evidence of an obesity paradox when using methods that are less prone to bias,» said Virginia Chang, MD, PhD, associate professor of social and behavioral sciences at NYU College of Global Public Health and the study's lead author.

University of Michigan Health System researchers revealed an obesity paradox among older Americans suffering from sepsis.

«The loss of an obesity paradox when switching from prevalent to incident cases and pre-diagnosis weight in the same dataset suggests that prevalent models are likely biased by factors such as disease - related weight loss and selective survival,» Chang said.

«Obesity paradox» not found when measuring new cases of cardiovascular disease: Obesity not associated with improved survival, contrary to prior studies.»

This effect, known as the obesity paradox phenomenon, is now being demonstrated in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension.

«An obesity paradox may also occur in patients with significant pulmonary hypertension,» said lead author Dr. Ronald Zolty.

This is known as the «obesity paradox.»

While obesity increases the risk of many types of cancer, it has been suggested that higher BMI decreases mortality risk in cancer patients, a phenomenon called the «obesity paradox.»

«Study of nearly 300,000 people challenges the «obesity paradox».»

The idea that it might be possible to be overweight or obese but not at increased risk of heart disease, otherwise known as the «obesity paradox,» has been challenged by a study of nearly 300,000 people published in in the European Heart Journal today (Friday).

Read the point - counterpoint debate on the obesity paradox here.

She continued: «This is the largest study that provides evidence against the obesity paradox in healthy people.

The researchers suggest that the previous confusion over the «obesity paradox» may be due to many factors that can confound results of studies.

Does the gastrointestinal microbiome contribute to the «obesity paradox» in melanoma survival?

Several studies have found that a high body mass index is associated with a lower risk of dying from heart disease and other chronic illnesses — a mysterious phenomenon that has come to be known as the «obesity paradox.»

The study also found, like some previous studies have, that a high BMI was associated with a lower risk of death, a phenomenon known as the «obesity paradox.»

There is an «obesity paradox» raging in the medical community.

I see lots of stories made up of handwringing over the «obesity paradox», normally presented as saying that even though obesity is a risk factor for all kinds of diseases, obese people appear to have lower mortality than others.