This also goes against the idea of scientists» opinions being entirely based on
objective analysis of the evidence, and concurs with previous studies that have shown scientists» opinions on topics to vary along with their political orientation,» writes survey author Neil Stenhouse of George Mason University.
This also goes against the idea of scientists» opinions being entirely based on
objective analysis of the evidence and concurs with previous studies that have shown scientists» opinions on topics to vary along with their political orientation (Nisbet 2011; Rosenberg et al. 2010).
The whole point of the scientific process is to move beyond, as much as is humanly possible, the political and cultural biases that every human being has, and to instead encourage rational,
objective analysis of the evidence at hand.
Not exact matches
Objective To conduct a meta -
analysis of available scientific
evidence on the association between breastfeeding and childhood leukemia.
Objective: We performed a meta -
analysis to summarize available
evidence of the association between breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration and EOC risk from published cohort and case - control studies.
This Presentation Includes: Well Formulated, Measurable, SMART
Objectives and Outcomes Engaging and Creative Lesson Starter — Spot PEE Overview
of Vocabulary used for a PEE Lesson Flipped Lesson Part - Video - Prezi - SlideShare: Language
Analysis, PEE Paragraph Space for Peer Teaching - PEE Technique Scaffolded Notes to Support the Learners - Sample, Template, Prompts Collaborative Group Task — Think - Share, Pair - Share, Shared Writing Mini-Plenary — Online Quizzes - Report Types,
Evidence, PEE Technique Assessment Criteria for Outcome Expectations - Rubrics Differentiated Activities for Level Learners - 4 Task Cards Extensions to Challenge the High Achievers - Completing PEE Paragraph Plenary to Assesses Learning Outcomes - PQP - Praise - Question - Polish Success Criteria for Self Evaluation - PEE Checklist Home Learning for Reinforcement - Online Exercises on PEED and PEE Common Core Standards - ELA.LIT.8.
From this statement, I infer that their
objective analysis produced a very high level
of confidence based upon multiple lines
of evidence (which is referred to as a consilience
of evidence), which they then downweighted to account for remaining uncertainties.
• Provide a clear,
evidence - based explanation
of the role played by different parts
of the energy sector in causing air pollution • Present detailed projections
of the energy sector and related air quality pathways in different countries and sectors, based on known energy, climate and air quality policies, and the key implications for policymakers • Identify additional policy measures that can materially improve the outlook for energy - related air pollution, examining both the co-benefits and trade - offs with other energy and climate
objectives • Based on
analysis of different policy options, distil the key findings
of the report into a clear set
of implications and recommendations for policymakers
To uphold the integrity
of science, we must bluntly and clearly expose fraud and return to use
of clear
objective evidence and accurate
analysis.
For the other considerations, the selection
of the very likely range appears to involve quite a lot subjective judgment
of the
evidence and go beyond fully
objective analysis.
Such
objective analysis will reveal that Richard C's «balance
of evidence» is just made up, and is confined to a couple
of individuals.
My point
of departure was to observe the extraordinary weakness
of the
analysis underpinning the schedules attached to the adjustments and the inconsistency
of the Folland adjustments with
objective evidence from Kent et al as to 1970 sampling.
Second, in view
of the finding on the liability phase that the Respondent deliberately touched the four complainants in a way that an
objective observer would find to be sexual and in accepting the complainants»
evidence that the touching was, to them, «blatantly sexual» there is no line
of analysis that could reasonably lead the tribunal to conclude that the Respondent's awkward, unskilled and non-empathic manner was a factor in understanding his abusive behaviour or that it could reasonably infer that he was genuinely and completely unaware
of the ways in which his behaviour in relation to his patients was in fact abusive,» said the ruling.