Not exact matches
If this is your company and you're caught in the middle of a minefield, your best option (short of quitting) for conflict management is to rise
above it: Point out the specific behavior in question, don't personalize the issue (be
objective), communicate assertively and state the
facts, and document everything that goes on.
I love the
fact that brownies are by their nature quite dense and a little gooey - this makes it easy to hide sight «mistakes» too (a light airy cake is typically much harder to achieve when keeping the
above objectives in mind!)
In
fact, significant emission reductions of 60 % -80 % compared to 1990 will be necessary by 2050 to reach the strategic
objective of limiting the global average temperature increase to not more than 2 °C
above pre-industrial levels.
Denialism gives you victim / threatened status (those evildoers are attacking our beliefs, we need to be warriors), enough victories to think of oneself as a winner but maintain the communal aspects of thinking oneself under threat, charismatic leaders, the companionship of shared beliefs, a sense of superiority to those who disbelieve, and, in the most cult - like aspect, the assurance of being
above mere
facts, of living in a world where your personal beliefs trump mere
objective facts.
Opposed to
above ends we have those who also are driven by the notion that only an
objective search for truth, wherever the
facts may lead, can ever provide any real value.
In
fact, some might argue that it should go without saying that experts ought to be honest and
objective and impartial and properly qualified and not stray
above / beyond their area of expertise.
In
fact, some might argue that it should go without saying that experts (especially the professional vendors of medico - legal expertise) ought to be honest and
objective and impartial and properly qualified and not stray
above / beyond their area of expertise.
As mentioned
above, the goal of contractual interpretation, to ascertain the
objective intentions of the parties, is inherently
fact specific.
These decisions do not adhere to the rigid step by step review of the factors
above, but instead, consider the specific
facts, apply an
objective standard, and decide whether it would have been reasonable for the employee to accept re-employment.