Sentences with phrase «objective morality exists»

Prove that objective morality exists without resorting to subjective means.

If not, then objective morality exists, if yes, then objective morality still exists.

If no objective morality exists, then there is no «right» or «wrong», there is only what you «feel».

Their reasoning goes something like this; I believe in God because objective morality exists and the reason I believe objective morality exists is because I believe in a god who holds that morality.

Just after you prove objective morality exists you can show us how that is evidence for your alleged god (s).

Remember, if one thing and only one thing is objectively morally evil or good, the objective morality exists.

Not exact matches

If the God of classical theism existed, an objective foundation for morality would exist.

Do you recognize even the POSSIBILITY that objective morality could exist, and that its source could be humanity as a collective?

This leads to a claim of objective morality, where none actually exists.

Do you recognize even the POSSIBILITY that objective morality could exist, and that its source could be that of a supernatural being?

Objective morality does not exist... --------------- If that's true, then no one has any grounds to call Hitler a bad person, or that he even did anything bad or wrong at all.

Or that such a thing as your concept of Objective Morality actually exists.

Objective morality does not exist, despite the protestations of numerous, disparate religions.

The only way that objective morality can possibly exist is if God exists, otherwise all morality is subjective to the opinions and whims of the individual.

But it can hardly be doubted that such a state of actually invincible error in moral questions exists also in society or in social groups in which the individual participates, so that his power of moral discernment does not go beyond a certain point, which, through no fault of his own, falls below objective morality.

Incidentally, even if god exists then his does not represent objective morality either.

However, if he commands it because morality is objective, morality can, obviously, exist without a god.

The question wasn't about historical facts, it was about whether or not objective morality actually exists.

There exists no objective morality and there can not exist any disinterested pursuit of truth.

If you wouldn't mind, ask him how he determines that an «objective morality» exists?

Ask him to define that «objective morality,» And ask him to explain how he knows that the 90 % of the American public that he thinks are incapable of critical thinking and who are immoral, don't accept that an «objective morality» (as he defines it) even exists.