Sentences with phrase «objective morality on»

Not exact matches

This was premised on the notion that standards of morality are objective and unchanging (therefore, «hate the sin»), but that human beings are weak and often fail to live up to those standards (therefore, «love the sinner»).

If we take the objective view and try to apply morality based on current American tradition god is immoral in a number of ways.

Since you base your morality on gods scale, you are blinded and not objective when actually judging gods actions.

Atheist morality is without any objective basis and, if followed with integrity, doesn't allow them to act against others who act contrary to their moral system (as they insist that each subjective moral judgment is equal in value, all being based purely on individual feelings).

Do YOU think that FORCING marriage on r@pe victims and others makes GOOD OBJECTIVE MORALITY?

6) ``... there is no objective morality... On atheism, no one is more morally right or wrong than the next person.

I will conclude by saying that on the atheistic there is no objective morality anyways so I don't believe that the atheist has any grounds for accusing God or anyone else for that matter if doing anything evil or wrong.

those appealing to Objective morality have the problem of having a standard imposed on them, but those without such a basis can not appeal to such a standard / justice & thereby have no compassion.

To take up your point on morality, I can not fathom how there is such a thing as «objective morality».

colin: «To take up your point on morality, I can not fathom how there is such a thing as «objective morality».

If one is looking for a robust defense of the idea that objective morality can be known on the basis of a naturalized epistemology, one will have to look elsewhere.

Traditional sexual morality depended on the assumption that human sexuality possessed an objective moral nature and seriousness that all human beings were obliged to respect and that society itself was entitled to protect through law and custom.

William Provine, for example, has been on a crusade to persuade the public that it has to discard either Darwinism or God, and not only God but also such non-materialistic concepts as free will and objective standards of morality.

Quite on the contrary, objective morality is far superior for the cooperative advancement of society instead of morality based on archaic stories that dangle an imaginary afterlife as a magical carrot.

Feigning a discussion about objective vs. subjective morality without qualifying values in the example in an attempt to get the casual reader to focus on the value the crafty writer wants you to adopt a an absolute truth — in this case how bad it would be to BBQ your grandmother, so that he can claim the the reader believes in objective «truths».

Without an objective view of morality (provided by one's religion), you really have nothing to stand on when defining what makes an action moral or immoral.

He'll reappear tomorrow, yipping like a Pomeranian on steroids about some other obsession of his — subjective / objective morality, perhaps.

In order to really judge the «morality» of the reforms, or their success in achieving their objectives, we need to properly understand the impact they are having on people's everyday lives.

He writes: «If evolutionary psychology is on track... we believe the things — about morality, personal worth, even objective truth — that lead to behaviours that get our genes into the next generation.»

Civilization depends on and proceeds from the notion of «objective» morality.

We should just go with his definition of «objective morality» and get on with it.