Given the highly limited capacities of infants / young children to assess risk, Dr. Van der Kolk recognizes that the lack of physical and / or emotional safety quickly rises to the level of a subjective survival threat (annihilation anxiety), even though
the objective nature of the event may not actually be at that level.
But our policy is to maintain the integrity of the website and
the objective nature of its content.
I nevertheless think it preferable for judges to say that they are trying, with reference to municipal legal systems, to solve legal problems in a way that will make a positive contribution to international law more generally, rather than to claim that general principles derive their validity from state consent or from
the objective nature of law.
So folks have to trust in the calm, cool,
objective nature of scientific inquiry.
The most recent statements made by Romm about the analysis in the Climate Shift report offer the opportunity to elaborate on how we can accurately assess the differences between
the objective nature of patterns in mainstream media coverage and how this coverage might be subjectively and anecdotally perceived by professional bloggers and media watchdogs.
continue this process by challenging
the objective nature of the map.
Writing to Arnold Glimcher, the founder of the Pace Gallery, in a letter reproduced in the catalog for this exhibition, Dubuffet explained his conception for the paintings as «intended to challenge
the objective nature of being.
That image is Lady Justice — blindfolded — signifying
the objective nature of justice (or, justice as it should be).
In contrast to the often narrowly defined single -
objective nature of flood control, they observe that SFM places an emphasis not only on reducing risk (to people, economics and the environment) but also on seeking opportunities to working with natural processes and promoting multiple benefits across a range of criteria (ecological, societal and economic).
As Fr Dylan James brings out later in this issue, the justification of «human rights» today is less and less grounded on
the objective nature of Man and more and more on the shifting sands of utilitarianism.
And as spiritual minds we also perceive the universal relationships which define
the objective nature of the things within our experience.
The objective nature of this property was expressed by Whitehead in his claim that the space of consentient sets was a fact of nature (PNK 31, CN 53).
Not exact matches
However, there may be potential benefits to incorporation and you should consult with an attorney or other trusted legal advisor to determine if changing the
nature of your business entity makes sense for your business
objectives.
Generally, founders agree to provide angels with reporting rights proportionate to the
nature of their investment, provided that satisfying the obligations do not materially detract from the pursuit
of the startup's
objectives.
This statement should continue to foster a better understanding, both in Australia and overseas,
of the
nature of the relationship between the Reserve Bank and the Government, the
objectives of monetary policy, the mechanisms for ensuring transparency and accountability in the way policy is conducted, and the independence
of the Reserve Bank.
Indeed, this Enlightenment view
of nature and human
nature is foundational for the industrial west (and now for everything from the global economy to the sexual revolution), in which the over-riding
objective is, in the words
of C. S. Lewis, «to subdue reality to the wishes
of [human beings].»
But his insistence that» [t] he envisaging creativity, the continuum
of extension, B's anticipatory feeling
of C, the disjunctive plurality
of attained actualities, the multiplicity
of eternal objects, and the primordial
nature of God are all alike involved in the creation
of C's dative [i.e., purely receptive] phase» (326) would lead one to believe that some sort
of objective medium must he present to facilitate the transmission to the new occasion
of so many non-
objective factors in its self - constitution (e g creativity, the anticipatory feelings
of B and other past occasions, the multiplicity
of eternal objects, the divine primordial
nature, etc.).
Thus, because the ultimate
objective, the totality to which my
nature is attuned has been made manifest to me, the powers
of my being begin spontaneously to vibrate in accord with a single note
of incredible richness wherein I can distinguish the most discordant tendencies effortlessly resolved: the excitement
of action and the delight
of passivity: the joy
of possessing and the thrill
of reaching out beyond what one possesses; the pride in growing and the happiness
of being lost in what is greater than oneself.
To avoid purely «subjectivistic» values, Camus, via the Greeks, posited the limits and beauty
of «
objective»
nature as man's sure guide.
Rather than yielding to relativistic morality, Newman's conception
of real assent fortifies
objective standards while embracing human
nature.
Instead
of alienation from a merely
objective world, we experience kinship and participation in
nature.
But ultimately, you are embracing the latter because you are arguing an
objective / absolute morality in god's immutable good
nature which is a source
of morality beyond god's actual control.
Since the senseless ra - pe
of an innocent bystander is objectively morally wrong and
objective morality is grounded in the
nature of God, then God can not command this for it is acting contrary to His
nature and His
nature doesn't change.
This is because every actual occasion, when it perishes, is added to the consequent
nature of God, where it is everlastingly preserved in an
objective state.
In addition to this being a case
of special pleading via definitional fiat, the immutable good
nature of god argument places the «
objective / absolute» standard beyond the control
of the god in that god has no choice but to obey this good
nature (which also confounds the notion
of omnipotence in that god is restricted to only a limited set
of possible behaviors).
• the capacity to reach
objective and universal truth as well as valid metaphysical knowledge; • the unity
of body and soul in man; • the dignity
of the human person; • relations between
nature and freedom; • the importance
of natural law and
of the «sources
of morality,»... • and the necessary conformity
of civil law to moral law.
Bonhoeffer was adamant in his belief that it was impossible to know the
objective truth about the real essence
of Christ's being -
nature (Christ the Center, pp. 30, 88, 100 - 101).
My
objective in this book has not been one
of demonstrating that there is purpose in
nature or
of specifying what that purpose is.
The latter are not susceptible to cataloguing as mathematical Platonic forms; hence, despite Whitehead's explicit remarks that the Primordial
Nature includes all eternal objects (PR 134; cf. 70), the Primordial
Nature is identified with the eternal objects
of the
objective species.
The public philosophy is the claim that the
objective law
of right, written into the
nature of things, makes on citizens, as contrasted with the claims that the citizens make on the natural and social reality on which they depend.
Mays takes the statement that «The order
of nature, prevalent in the cosmic epoch in question, exhibits itself as a morphological scheme involving eternal objects
of the
objective species» (PR 447f) and renders it: The order
of nature is a morphological scheme
of mathematical Platonic forms (PW 58/56).
The
objective immortality
of his consequent
nature is considered later (cf. Part V); we are now concerned with his primordial
nature» (PR 47).
There was some question whether Whitehead holds that God exercises his
objective immortality in two different ways and that the giving
of the initial aim is quite distinct from the superjective
nature.
While the other main texts on the
objective lure stem from an earlier chapter on «The Order
of Nature» (II.3 C), closer scrutiny suggests that they belong to a single insertion, made during the transitional period (C +) before Whitehead reconceived concrescence in terms
of the prehension
of past occasions.8
True,
objective science like the observations outlined by Charles Darwin describe aspects
of Nature that simply MUST BE.
This is not an ultimate community whose solidarity is an expression
of an ahistorical human
nature or derived from some nonhuman
objective reality, but the kind
of democratic community endorsed by thinkers like Dewey.
We conclude, then, that the superjective
nature is the
objective immortality
of God as a whole.
The superjective
nature, then, is God exercising his
objective immortality by laying down a datum which conditions the form
of all subsequent creative acts.
Though it seems by no means necessary to have identical concepts
of the
nature and function
of religion, it is desirable not to be determined by antipathy or sympathy to the degree which would make an
objective investigation impossible.
One
of the main tasks
of the school is competent vocational guidance, which is governed primarily not by the principle
of helping the student prepare for and get the position he wants, but by the
objective of teaching students to know their own abilities and the
nature of their society and persuading and inspiring them to devote their energies to the tasks that most urgently need to be done.
, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part, at least, based on a misunderstanding
of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because
of his individual and personal emphasis the notion
of an
objective revelation
of God in
nature and history involving the whole community
of Israel in the real event
of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's view
of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure
of Yahweh as the Lord
of nature and
of history recedes into the background because
of an overconcern with the experience
of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide
of the mark, as is shown by the present chapter.)
Only when we understand the specific relationship between abstract entities, on the one hand, and material and mental entities on the other, as elaborated in his theory
of objective idealism, does the true meaning
of the concluding chapter
of The Idea
of Nature become clear.
Because, at least in part, they think
of personality as
objective, they hope to safeguard God's personality, or His personal relations with man, by limiting His
nature to the personal alone.
I once cite «Realism and Idealism,» the passage about
objective idealism in which Collingwood clearly states his conception
of the world
of nature: «Thus it conceives the world
of nature as something derived from and dependent upon something logical prior to itself, a world
of immaterial ideas; but this is not a mental world or a world
of mental activities or
of things depending on mental activity although it is an intelligible world or a world in which mind, when mind comes into existence, finds itself completely at home.
Despite the potential and actual contribution
of capitalistic globalization to improve human life, the safeguarding
of human rights or the care
of nature are not among its specific
objectives.
Even the statement that «
nature is
objective» and presumably neutral toward human meanings, is the product
of an historically rooted perspective, the very one that we called dualistic in the previous chapter.
He writes to Anderson, «you presumably know that for me
objective immortality in the consequent
nature of God is the essential [emphasis Hartshorne's] immortality, whatever may or may not happen upon or after our death.»
When I - It blocks the return to I - Thou, it poses as reality itself: it asserts that reality is ultimately
of the
nature of abstract reason or
objective category and that it can be understood as something external, clearly defined, and entirely «
objective.»
It pays less attention to
objectives such as the promotion
of the good life
of all, production for use, employment, fair trade, or safeguarding
nature.
He had long explored the complexities
of human
nature in history and society, but in this book he turned the problem around and looked at the subject which was involved, turning from the
objective self which most analysts look at to the subjective self behind the object.