Not exact matches
I read an interesting article today written by a quantum mechanic
claiming that the new direction in such scientific studies is that we can't be sure there is an
objective reality but can only hope so, because what we perceive as reality is shaped by the
observer.
(This, of course, is a typical postmodern approach to epistemology: No one can
claim to be a truly
objective observer; we are all influenced by our interpretive communities.)
In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely
objective observer would not be
claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.
When scientists take positions on policy, they forfeit their
claim of being
objective observers.
A reasonably
objective observer would give no weight to the
claims of partiality advanced by the moving party.