Sentences with phrase «objective reality of»

I'm thinking that new moniker would better comport with the objective reality of Web's condition and issues.

I'm rather a religious believer in the objective reality of somethingness, so if it is in fact an existential truth that there are indeed multiple Universes then whether or not I know it or can observe them it would be rather silly to assert that they definitely do not exist — or vice versa.

His work is an amalgamation of a mental map, documenting his subjective feelings about the places he visits, as well as the objective reality of the cities» layouts and existences.

This is the objective reality of money, and when you approach it this way, it's easy to keep your emotions under control.

Marx begins his account of the relationship of the two philosophers with a paradox: Epicurus held all appearances to be objectively real but at the same time, since he wished to conserve freedom of the will, denied that the world was governed by immutable laws and thus in fact seemed to decry the objective reality of nature.

Hence, the issue of the objective reality of the universe as an all - encompassing social totality or, in Whiteheadian terms, structured society can not be resolved empirically at the present time; accordingly, one should be free to postulate it as a trans - empirical hypothesis as I am doing here.

This limitation of objects to what functions in human sense - experience has rendered the reality of God highly problematic, and in late modernism, belief in the objective reality of God has been viewed as somewhat eccentric.

We also capitulate to the dictatorship of relativism when we substitute the sociological idea of «religious identity» for the objective reality of religious fact.

If this is true, then any supposed necessity of separating ourselves in our subjectivity from the objective reality of Jesus Christ is fundamentally dislocated.

What we need at this point is an interpretive framework permitting us so to specify the possibility of the objective reality of the risen Christ that Paul's experience may be approached as a vision rather than as an hallucination.

The point for emphasis is that these values may be realized only when the party system is predicated upon the objective reality of the good and loyalty to it, and not when parties are committed to a struggle for their own members» advantage.

Tell us all the objective Reality of what good has been provided by religion for thousands of years that make people hold on to it in spite of already knowing these wonderous truths you keep reminding us about over and over about like a broken record.

What perishes in this process, marking the loss of reality's subjective immediacy, is the existential reality of essential features; what remains is the objective reality of conditional and essential features harmonized.

More generally, it stands within the «realist» tradition in affirming the objective reality of the orders of truth and other kinds of excellence, as against nominalists and subjectivists who believe that knowledge is essentially a human construct and values are nothing but human preferences.

Many others, who did grasp my meaning, were dismayed because, while I asserted the objective reality of God's act at Easter, I did not take the stories of the empty tomb as the basis of my interpretation of that act of God, but, on the contrary, suggested that these stories may be unhelpful to our understanding of the Easter message.

At a personal level the prayer of the Divine Office also strengthens the virgin in her own seeking of Christ by uniting her with the whole Church, and that discipline and objective reality of the Office will sustain her in the inevitable times of aridity in her spiritual life.

There was absolutely no question whatsoever of the objective reality of the one who appeared thus in «vision.»

Those people aren't interested in truth; they prefer Stephen Colbert's truthiness, not the objective reality of truth but what feels like it ought to be truth.

To illustrate how an artist, in his or her subjectivity and historical situation, can, through the ministrations of the Spirit, plumb the objective realities of Jesus Christ, I would like to discuss three portrayals: Michelangelo's Pietà Rondanini, Henri Matisse's Fourteen Stations of the Cross and Georges Rouault's 1905 Head of Christ.

Not exact matches

«What they're teaching their kids is to see the world through the eyes of objective reality — the way society really is.»

While I don't believe the reality is quite as intentionally malicious as that image portrays, the clear business model of every social media company is driven by one fundamental objective; understand your users better than they understand themselves, whatever it takes!

It's not a reality show where you are the star, and if you're focused on delivering results and impact, then you should separate yourself from the equation and think of how the team can meet the objective above.

What about questions of objective reality?

Broadly speaking, it describes the way unconscious generalizations about people («men are better leaders») lead people to ignore objective reality («these women are outscoring most of the men on the leadership test»).

Blass noted in the letter that while ICI shares «the state's objective of increasing retirement plan coverage for private - sector workers,» the goal «must be achieved in a cost - effective way that reflects the realities of the work force and retirement savings.»

The objective of the Gold Pool was to disguise reality.

And not surprisingly, you dodged the point, because the extreme feminist worldview can not countenance much in the way of facts or objective reality.

Yes, the path is rocky, they say, but peer review, competition between researchers, and the comforting fact that there is an objective reality out there whose test every theory must withstand or fail, all conspire to mean that sloppiness, bad luck, and even fraud are exposed and swept away by the advances of the field.

And while it is purely hypothetical in your particular case, it is nothing short of reality for tf, hence the reason he defines morality as objective.

When I use the word «subjective» I mean that which is defined by a person (subject) or people; when I say «objective» I mean that which exists apart from any person or people, regardless of how or if that objectively existing reality might be known.

It is rather an objective but strictly non-entitative reality, i.e., a structured environment or unified field of activity for the emergence of successive generations of actual occasions.

Indeed, this Enlightenment view of nature and human nature is foundational for the industrial west (and now for everything from the global economy to the sexual revolution), in which the over-riding objective is, in the words of C. S. Lewis, «to subdue reality to the wishes of [human beings].»

Some Calvinist evangelicals talk about a Federal Vision in which the worldwide church of Jesus Christ is an objective spiritual reality.

As is, Christians feel it is their duty to work hard to make sure the law reflects what their religions says is just and good, regardless of the objective reality.

While employing the Hegelian categories of the «universal» and the «objective» as a means of understanding the new reality created by modern man, Kierkegaard came to understand the modern consciousness as the product of a Faustian choice.

And apropos of your commentary, I think we also continuously fabricate stories about ourselves to ourselves (as well as to others)-- though we often persuade ourselves that this is objective introspection and thus represents reality.

With the birth of objective knowledge, reality appeared as an objective order, and God was banished from the «real» world.

Indeed, there's a huge pile of concepts that have no objective reality.

Schubert Ogden, for example, argues that the most fundamental use of the word «God» is to refer to «the objective ground in reality itself of our ineradicable confidence in the final worth of our existence (RG 37).

To this day, the greatest achievement of theological mediation in this direction is Bultmann's method of demythologizing, which assumes that any objective meaning of the gospel, any meaning that speaks of the world or reality as such, including the idea that the end of the world is at hand, belongs to the world of myth and not of gospel, and therein is consigned either to the premodern age of humanity or to the realm of the old Adam or «flesh» (sarx).

Kierkegaard knew the death of God only as an objective reality; indeed, it was «objectivity» that was created by the death of God.

This point of view fully respects the progressive experimental concentration of human thought in a more and more lively awareness of its unifying role; but in place of the undefined point of convergence required as term for this evolution it is the clearly defined personal reality of the incarnate Word that is made manifest to us and established for us as our objective, that Word «in whom all things subsist.»

Our interpretation of the self - image becomes theological when we speak from within the faith of the Church and say that the objective reality which stands between persons is God made personal and available to us in Jesus Christ.

Rubenstein can teach the Christian that the God who stands aloof from the history of nations is the God who stands aloof from Auschwitz, and that the price of accepting a dehistorized or subjective God (the God who is absolute Subject and only Subject) is the abandonment of the objective world or reality as such to the realm of «flesh.»

It is a paradox, yet true, that the more deeply we seek to affirm the reality of God's condescension to the depths of our human situation, the more we are enabled, and indeed led, somehow to represent the content of his act in Christ in objective terms.

Yet Christians continue to be encountered by his living presence in other modes, and the reality of their experience is more easily understandable, to say the least, if the appearances at Easter were a real encounter with an objective presence.

He believes there is some point to the criticisms that Bultmann dissolves Christology into soteriology, 3 for he has been unable «to express in an adequate way the «objective» reality of the revelatory event Jesus the Christ «4 even though he does «intend a divine act in the fully real and «objective» sense.

Ogden stated in Christ Without Myth (1961) that he intended to express the «objective» reality of the event Jesus Christ more adequately than Bultmann had succeeded in doing, but that this would have to come in a later work.17 His fullest treatment of the problem thus far appeared in 1963 in his essay, «What Sense Does it Make to Say, «God Acts in History»»?

science is not everything, the problem is when the critical and objective philosophy of science is accepted as absolute in reality.God is beyond logic at this point of our consciousness, The process of gods will manfistation is evolution which accepts all variables in the process, the input could be not what scienctists wants.Thats why faith or religion is part of reality.

The Church knows an objective structure of reality which is anterior to and binding on the free decision of man and which as such stands under God's will and sanction.