Not exact matches
Sure this
still shows the
objective, experiential heart of
science but that is not all that
science is.
But I'm looking for an
objective, non partisan explanation of whether or not Trickle Down economics has been effective in the past People debate whether economics is a hard or soft
science, but I think it's fair to say that even if it's a hard
science, conclusions can
still differ and, at the end of the day, economic policy certainly can, and often is,...
To be sure a «debate» over whether or not human activity is altering the climate
still rages, but it is not a clear - headed
objective debate about the
science among scientists actually working in the relevant fields, it's a debate about the
science and its impact on human society in the court of public opinion.
You can reject basic logic and
science methods all you like but it is
still very obvious BS to
objective observers.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how the tobacco industry attempted to trivialise the health risks of second hand smoke (SHS) by both questioning the
science of risk assessment of low dose exposure to other environmental toxins, and by comparing SHS to such substances about which debate might
still exist.
by Henry F. Schaefer III To find
objective truth by
science still requires operating by the foundational principles of transcendent truth and conduct.
So the extensive work of leading oceanographers from Universities the world over, and work by NASA, NOAA, and multiple other leading institutions of
science, thrown out the window, on a tricky but
still fairly
objective question of fact, by someone writing the opposite.
Why should I consider climate
science and climate models to be any better than horoscope
science and astrological charts, since honest,
objective researchers with integrity (like your good self) are
still the tiny, insignificant minority in climate research?
I found an estimation of the radiative forcing close to earlier estimations by NASA / GISS group when they were
still doing
objective science.
Comparatively little attention has been paid to overcoming the biases that psychologists have identified, except insofar as this might serve the national security
objective of discouraging extremism through the introduction of measures to combat effects such as confirmation bias.15 It is
still possible to envisage behavioral
science playing a part in the great social experiment of providing the kind of public education that nurtures the critical faculties of everyone in our society.