I would argue that
objectivism arose initially and that it subsequently attained cultural dominion primarily because it was intended by its architects as a way of avoiding violence.
Not exact matches
Pragmatism, however, at least the pragmatism of William James, actually
arose as a sharp protest against the kind of thinking that Palmer calls
objectivism but which was called «positivism» at the time that James was writing in the 1870s and 1880s.
Yet if Palmer is correct, as I think he is, in taking
objectivism to be the epistemology that informs the practices of the modern university, and if I am correct in suggesting that James and others had already fashioned powerful alternative theories of knowledge as early as 1880, a vital historical question
arises.