Sentences with phrase «objects as the subjects»

Much of our language refers to objects as the subjects of sentences and then to their attributes or actions.

Because of this transmutation the experience is sometimes said to be devoid of object, but it is more proper to say that it is an experience of object as subject and subject as object, in which the two are felt as a contrast within oneness, each the manifestation of the other.

Cubist artists like Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque rejected linear perspective and distorted the shape of the objects they painted, but still took objects as their subject.

This iconoclastic gesture destroyed the vessel as a container, and conceptually transformed the object as subject.»

The artist's own printmaking also takes everyday objects as subject matter and combines boldly defined outline with vivid colouring, an approach which the artist also applies to his own self - image: the defined, linear drawing style combined with complete freedom and openness in the choice of colours.

OBJECT AS SUBJECT: The Lehigh University Art Galleries Teaching Collection MAIN GALLERY, ZOELLNER ARTS CENTER & THE GALLERY AT RAUCH BUSINESS CENTER August 26, 2015 — May 27, 2016

Event: Object as Subject Gallery Talk with Nicholas Sawicki, Assistant Professor of Art History, and LUAG Director / Chief Curator Ricardo Viera.

Odilon Redon, 1840 - 1916, The Potted Geranium, c. 1865, Oil on Canvas (On display as part of Object As Subject, Main Gallery, August 26, 2105 — May 27, 2016)

Ordinary as Extraordinary / Object as Subject, Galveston Arts Center, Galveston, Texas Multiples, Davis / McClain Gallery, Houston, Texas

Using banal objects as subjects for his paintings and prints, Dine displayed a growing sense of self - awareness.

Duchamp and the hothouse atmosphere of the Black Mountain College inspired the inclusion of everyday objects as a subject and as a material.

Objects as subjects, or subjects as objects.

Serra's transitive verb - list from the 1960s envisions sculptural objects as subjects of action in space — to fold, to roll, to prop.

Not exact matches

The study was conducted by researchers at the University of Sydney and examined three groups of students, who were tasked with completing an «alternate uses» test — a common creativity drill wherein subjects are given an object and asked to come up with as many uses for it as they can.

According to Paul Greenberg, adopt they must for buyers want to be «subjects of an experience» and not an «object of a sale» as Greenberg eloquently states.

It requires attentiveness to the subject as subject, not merely object; to the integrity of craft; to form as well content.

He pointed out how, because of the dominant reductionist view of human nature, scientists are increasingly tempted to treat the human individual as «an object to be investigated, measured and experimented upon» rather than as an «irreducible subject».

And from There You Shall Seek by Joseph Soloveitchik Ktav, 230 pages, $ 29.50 Near the end of Courage to Be, Paul Tillich writes: «God as a subject makes me into an object which is nothing more than an object.

Now this would be a valid argument if one understood the self in terms of individual autonomy, so that one's understanding of one's self as subject would be quite distinct from ones understanding of the cosmic or historical situation one confronted as object.

One can see here the connection between the internal relation between eternal objects, and the fact that from the standpoint of the prehending occasion, its datum, as a logical subject placed within a functional context, is internally related to it.

We are not to think of subjects or objects that act or are acted upon but of activities as such.

-LSB-...] charity is placed as a key link: divine charity works through human action, as a theological virtue -LSB-...] Man is not considered only as the object of a process, but as the subject of this process.

God does in fact treat us as subjects — that is as those having their own agency — but many preach a gospel in which we have been reduced to objects forced to live life in according to some divinely mapped - out and pre-ordained «plan», or to be the at the mercy of divine manipulation.

He is both the subject and object of our confidence, and as generations of saints who have come before us have testified in word and in deed, he is sufficient.

(PR 271) Actual entities or actual occasions are subjects insofar as they are present and objects only insofar as they are past.

One is the view that what defines an inquiry as «theology» is that it employs the distinctive methods or disciplines required by its peculiar object or subject matter.

Given the standard Enlightenment view of the world as composed of human subjects and nonhuman objects, this dualism of humans and commodities seems appropriate.

Not only do many (as objects) flow into one (subject), but one (as object) flows into many (subjects).

Looked at that way, the essential content of revelation, or perhaps the very nature of God (whatever is the ultimate «subject matter» or «object» of the inquiry) dictates certain methods and movements of thought which, if followed, denominate the inquiry as «theology.»

Perhaps «rule» or, better, the active participle «ruling» would come nearest to the original, but constant reference to the «ruling of God» would be both clumsy and subject to the facetiousness of reading the genitive as a genitive of object!

Neither prehension nor intentionality describes the exclusive agency of a self - contained subject, nor the exclusive agency of an object as strict realists such as Brentano would have seen it.

Even though scientific theories may have folk - theories as their origin and folk - theories may have to serve as reliable guides to a given subject in the absence of a developed scientific theory, when truth is the primary concern and time is no object, folk - theories are usually superseded by their scientific counterparts.

6 In a conformal feeling, an eternal object already ingressed as characterizing the subjective form of an individual objectification given for a nascent occasion is reingressed as a character of the subjective form of the nascent subject's prehension of that objectification (PR 476, 364, 78).

As Emmanuel Levinas states: «Intentionality is not the way in which a subject tries to make contact with an object that exists beside it.

Both prehension and intentionality describe the relationship of a subject and an object in such a way as to overcome this subject - object split.

the claim can be illustrated more complexly as follows: My present subject (actual entity) and contemporaneous actual entities in the physical object do not constitute a nexus.

Thus a human experience is not to be understood as a subject encountering an object.

We saw that for Farley theological inquiry is defined as precisely theological by the nature of its subject matter (or «object» of inquiry)-- namely, faith - within - its - situations.

Even in the case of the objectification of a single actual entity, that subject is objectified as object, and not as subject.

True, for Aristotle the object is present in the sentient subject not in its entirety but with respect to some aspect, e.g., as red.

There is activity, therefore, not only on the side of the subject but on the side of the object as well.

That is, the form is received in matter as it is in any physical change, but also the form is received without matter, that is, it is possessed in disassociation from the sentient's material constitution.3 In virtue of this second mode of reception, the sensible thing is something more than an agent; it becomes an object for an experiencing subject — though this is not, of course, how Aristotle expressed it.

The physical prehension as conformal feeling, we have said, reproduces the object by assuming the subjective form of one of its prehensions, but as vector it is, and remains throughout the «life» of the subject, an essential relation to that individual object as other, as there and then.

As long as the poor remain objects of volunteer trips rather than joint subjects in a common enterprise of faith, it's never going to be missioAs long as the poor remain objects of volunteer trips rather than joint subjects in a common enterprise of faith, it's never going to be missioas the poor remain objects of volunteer trips rather than joint subjects in a common enterprise of faith, it's never going to be mission.

Although objects and subjects differ in many ways, both were conceived as beings.

There are similarities between the two accounts of perception, as we have already indicated: perception has as its object an individual; it introduces the object within the percipient; it comes about through the causal efficacy of the object; and it presupposes the transmission of form from object to subject.

At the basic levels, indeed, the subject is, and must be, also patient, and thus the object is also experienced as agent.

Whereas the activity of the subject is a fulfillment and perfecting of the subject, and thus an end in itself, the activity of the sensible object is an «acting upon» and, as such, presupposes a passive factor that is acted upon and thereby changed.

The object exerts its causal influence not by acting upon the subject, but solely as being inert, stubborn fact exacting conformity.

Whitehead took the subject - object structure as general and fundamental and interpreted causal efficacy in terms of it.