Sentences with phrase «objects change as»
These images and objects change as you look at them; with time, things appear and disappear.»
http://www.milesmcenery.com/ Not exact matches
(It's a complicated argument that boils down to two sides: One saying many games treat women as sexual objects and the other side arguing that «social justice warriors» are trying to change the hobby they enjoy.)
One of the features Apple is exploring is the ability to take a picture and then change the depth of the photograph or the depth of specific objects in the picture later; another would isolate an object in the image, such as a person's head, and allow it to be tilted 180 degrees.
As business managers, we should keep an eye on how these smart objects change the consumer's expectations around user experience and engagement.
That the bragging happened a decade ago doesn't change the reality that a man who might be president sees half the country's population not just as objects for his own aesthetic gratification — we knew that thanks to the beauty pageants and the string of model wives — but objects for his physical gratification as well, regardless of how the women in question feel about it.
A recognition that the costs of climate change policy can not be shuffled off to hate - objects such as oil companies and Albertans.
Change and time in our experience of the world are perceived as related to the differences between objects.
The brain neutralizes change by transferring it from the time within objects to the space between them, displacing the change that is ingredient in the object to a surface interaction as another property of space.
In microgenesis, change is perceived as a comparison across the successive occasions of an actual object.
As Whitehead says,» «Change» is the description of the adventures of eternal objects in the evolving universe of actual things» (PR 59 / 92).
Thus there is no reason why perfect knowledge could not change, grow in content, provided it changed only as its objects changed, and added as new items to its knowledge only things that were not in being, not there to know, previously.
Time as the number of motion and change measures both the duration of the process of change and the parallel duration of objects at rest during the same interval.
If this were not the case, then these units of consciousness would change, for added to the constitution of the drop taken from the other objects of knowledge there would have to be the knowledge of itself as distinguished from the knowledge of its objects.
That is, the form is received in matter as it is in any physical change, but also the form is received without matter, that is, it is possessed in disassociation from the sentient's material constitution.3 In virtue of this second mode of reception, the sensible thing is something more than an agent; it becomes an object for an experiencing subject — though this is not, of course, how Aristotle expressed it.
In the same spirit Santayana and Whitehead agree in objecting, like Nietzsche, to the idea that change in the natural world is controlled by «laws of nature,» viewing the laws rather as simply descriptions of what each unit to which they apply «decides» to do itself (RB 301 - 302).
As objects in one's visual field move through space, for example, one's feeling of them changes.
Whereas the activity of the subject is a fulfillment and perfecting of the subject, and thus an end in itself, the activity of the sensible object is an «acting upon» and, as such, presupposes a passive factor that is acted upon and thereby changed.
Nor is this situation changed by the special place which philosophy gives the absolute as the object from which all other objects are derived, or as «Speech» (Logos), «the Unlimited,» or simply «Being.»
As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hithertAs being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hithertas an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hitherto.
And this higher and liberating orientation by grace of man's transcendence as spirit, changing as it does in good Thomistic doctrine the very horizon of spiritual activity (the «formal object»), constitutes by the nature of the case a «revelation», even if it presents no new conceptual object to the mind, and therefore, if accepted, is faith.
A cardinal number is defined ill Principia as a complete class of equi - numerous classes (of objects); thus every change in the number of physical objects will alter the meaning of each number.
When in 169 one of the contestants, Menelaus, was returned to the office, Antiochus, who had already incurred the bitter resentment of faithful Jews by his interference, sought to correct his financial plight by entering the Temple himself and stripping it of its considerable movable wealth.31 Antiochus became at once the object of Judaism's bitterest hate; and no doubt in part in retaliation but also as an expression of this ardent Hellenist's frustration with a people slow to change, he effected an otherwise quite unprovoked attack on Jerusalem in 168.
God is understood as unchanging in his primordial nature which envisions the eternal objects and as changing in his creative response to the events of the world.
Once the primordial nature of God and its timeless ordering of eternal objects is envisioned as the ground of novelty, then not only can there he no fundamental or ontological change of reality, but potentiality as such must be limited to a primordial envisagement of possibility.
(2) Unlike Descartes and flume, Locke distinguishes ontologically the object that initiates change (or has «active powers») from the object receiving it or being acted upon; this asymmetry Whitehead adopts as well.
The reason why Whitehead believes that it must be independent is that only if it is a system of relations independent of the changing, variable, physical characters of material objects can it serve as a frame of reference in terms of which the self - congruence of material objects under transport — which makes them suitable as measuring standards — can be determined.
Although it literally means, «to change one's mind» it always has sin as it's object, and so repentance always means to turn away from sin.
Colour's five hues from th» eyes their sight will take; Music's five notes the ears as deaf can make; The flavours five deprive the mouth of taste; The chariot course, and the wild hunting waste Make mad the mind; and objects rare and strange, Sought for, men's conduct will to evil change.
People's conditionning in consumerism in subtle ways is changing the theological concept of faith, so that in certain theologies God is seen not so much as the object of service and obedience but as a convenient device by which one's religious needs are met.
And so the list goes, with the actual numbers changing somewhat from year to year, yet the fact that more people are killed with blunt objects each year remains constant.For example, in 2011, there was 323 murders committed with a rifle but 496 murders committed with hammers and clubs.While the FBI makes is clear that some of the «murder by rifle» numbers could be adjusted up slightly, when you take into account murders with non-categorized types of guns, it does not change the fact that their annual reports consistently show more lives are taken each year with these blunt objects than are taken with Feinstein's dreaded rifle.Another interesting fact: According to the FBI, nearly twice as many people are killed by hands and fists each year than are killed by murderers who use rifles.
As for anyone who might object, I think the expression is «go f *** yourself,» unless they find that offensive in which case they can turn off the TV for once and go for a walk for a change.
On a calmer but still frustrated level there was talk of the need for «change» with much finger pointing at Arsene as manager being the object in need of change.
Speaker Logan Taele, an LDS defensive end from Ohio, used the roller coasters at Cedar Point as an object lesson on dealing with change.
You change, and then as you change the loop changes in response — not literally but subjectively — and so the pattern that emerges is not two straight lines, proceeding parallel, one looking blandly at the other, but an intricate, uncertain braid between a constantly changing observer and their constantly shifting object.
When your child is under 4 months you can change their crib position, place a light in their room or talk to your baby as you move around to encourage them to focus on different objects.
It can also be used as a comfort or transitional object for children in new or changing activities at home and school.
-LSB-...] your money on Big Food over kids» health: just as Minnesota Congresswoman Amy Klobuchar came to the aid of frozen food manufacturer Schwann, located in her state, when it objected to changes to the rule -LSB-...]
But as soon as they start grasping for things, even on the changing tables or whether laying down or you're playing with them you wan na start looking around for small objects that they can pick up and put in their mouth and they can possible choke on.
Move objects such as picture frames and ceramic figurines away from the changing table and crib so they can't accidentally fall on your child.
That means lots of easy - to - handle snacks (like dry cereal, fig bars, or crackers), milk, water, plenty of diapers and wipes, a sweater in cool weather, two changes of clothes (in case of diaper blowouts, carsickness, or other spills), extra clothes for you (you never know when you'll become part of the mess), comfort objects (bear, blankie), and multiple diversions (such as board books, small toys, and finger puppets).
Even though Nestlé sometimes appears to be an unmovable object, the boycott does force changes in its policies and practices as explained below.
But as she begins to be ready for solids, you will observe a change in the way she moves her mouth — there may be less drool, as she is more capable of swallowing, and she will start to lose the «tongue - thrust reflex,» which expels objects — including food if attempted too early — from the mouth.
It can run on all surfaces — indoor and outdoor — and it is designed to instantly change directions as soon as it makes contact with another object.
I know that she won't always object to diaper changing as much as she does not, but she sure is making it challenging.
The scientist - authored book Authoritative Parenting, which Sax references in his book, points out that authoritative parents should be willing to negotiate and change their demands when their children reasonably object and that it is authoritarian parents who, «if challenged, threaten punishment and give «because I say so» as a reason for compliance.»
When this new alliance - the European Conservatives and Reformists - was created after the 2009 Euro - election with «a bunch of homophobes, anti-Semites and climate - change deniers» (as Nick Clegg later described them in a TV leaders debate) I objected and was expelled from the Conservative Party.
As she told the Sunday Times: «Economics are the method: the object is to change the heart and soul».
On the other hand, Edmund Burke, a predecessor to modern conservatism, saw government as an institution that grew organically as a tradition, and that we should be suspicious of making changes to it just because individuals in the current generation happen to object to it.
As proof of this, he noted the name for the military operation against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan was changed from «Operation Infinite Justice» to «Operation Enduring Freedom» after Muslim scholars and clerics objected to the first on religious grounds.
This should lead to tremendous advances in time - domain astronomy: studying fast - changing phenomena as they occur — black holes being born, supernovas exploding — as well as locating potentially Earth - threatening asteroids and mapping the little - understood population of objects orbiting out beyond Neptune.