Confused astronomers named
the objects failed stars, superplanets, or simply brown dwarfs.
Not exact matches
From the way the
object bent the light, Andrew Gould of Ohio State University in Columbus and colleagues have now found that it is a brown dwarf — a «
failed star» with too little mass to sustain the nuclear reactions that power
stars.
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA — The surprising heat from 63 brown dwarfs is helping astronomers make the case that these puzzling
objects are
failed stars, and not big planets, as some have argued.
These
failed stars, or brown dwarfs, inhabit a peculiar gray area between large planets and small
stars, and their split personalities are providing scientists with new ways to learn about both kinds of
objects.
Most brown dwarfs are «
failed stars»,
objects that were born with too little mass to shine brightly by fusing hydrogen in their cores.
To explain the MOA results, some theorists guessed that many of the purported rogue giant planets were actually free - floating
failed stars called brown dwarfs — intermediate
objects that straddle the hazy line between being a planet and a sun.
But other astronomers claim the
objects are very puny brown dwarfs, a type of
failed star.
Other
objects reported by the group, at an American Astronomical Society meeting in Honolulu, included five
failed stars, known as brown dwarfs.
It is frequently applied to the coolest
objects, including K - and M - dwarfs, which are true
stars, and brown dwarfs, often referred to as «
failed stars» because they do not sustain hydrogen fusion in their cores.