Sentences with phrase «objects have only»

If money were no object I would only keep Ozil, Bellerin and Koscielny.

The fact there must then be tens of thousands of black holes at the galactic center stems from the notion these objects would only very rarely be accompanied by a star to make them glow — most would remain isolated, invisible singletons.

«This object has only been observed at one epoch, so they don't really know that it's co-moving with the star,» Deming told New Scientist.

Not exact matches

The company objects particularly to the idea that sales were a motivating factor: «Only McKesson's Regulatory personnel have the authority to raise a customer's threshold limit, and the compensation for these personnel has never been based on revenue or profitability targets for sales of controlled substances,» a McKesson spokesperson commented.

«Plus, getting some fresh air will not only help wake you up, but if you've been working on a computer, focusing your eyes on longer distance objects can help minimize eyestrain — and getting some sunlight can help reset your clock,» Kerr adds.

For a while, there have been only two real objects of ultra-lust: Dell's Adamo and — the gizmo that really got everyone salivating — Apple's $ 1,500 MacBook Air.

Three - dimensional printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has been around since the 1980s, but only recently has the technology become sophisticated enough to make complex objects like airplane parts.

They consistently emphasize and over index on people's titles and credentials and forget that -; unless you're only concerned with window dressing and PR -; the object of the board - building exercise is to get some regular help, a sympathetic ear or two, and some people on your team who've been there before, who will tell you the truth when necessary, and who share your vision for the business.

Ideally, Fennell said, federal regulators would have required not only backup cameras but also emergency braking and alert systems that automatically stop a vehicle when sensors detect objects or people in a rear blind spot.

Storj is a decentralized distributed, encrypted, and blazing fast object cloud storage, where only you have access to your data.

But only one Republican member of Congress appears to have sent out a news release objecting to Trump's comments.

If a taxpayer has reported only 5000 euros income, but has property worth millions of euros, the property should be taken, the payer and his family should be obliged to pay back taxes, and a few criminal convictions should serve as an object lesson to help enforce compliance with the tax code.

Yet having encountered this fantastic tree with human features, readers can no longer look upon real trees as mere objects meant only for our manipulation.

After that point an actual entity has only objective existence, whereby it serves as an «object» in the constitution of a superseding actuality and becomes a datum for the creative advance (PR 72).

Earth is the only known celestial object to have organic material in its regolith!

It has been the sins of the Leviathan and Dynasau not only to make all humans as objects of exploitation and oppression, but it is also the sin to make the created things the object of the exploitation, for these sins are to turn the God's created garden into the jungle.

Do you really think that most who object to Calvinism do so only because of a gut feeling, while those who teach and hold to Calvinism do so because they have studied the Scripture?

Even though interest has increased, it has not been the object of an extensive study since Stauffer's Christ and the Caesars in 1955 and has only played a significant part in a handful of other published works.

Nay, as they occur in Exodus 9:16, they scarce mean even that, but only that God had kept Pharaoh from dying in the preceding plague, so as to be made the more fully an object lesson to all men.

While Tillich provides a system to overcome the subject - object dilemma of Cartesianism, he denies that Being - itself is actually increased or decreased by events, i.e., it is not in process, and, therefore, does not share in human adventures.5 Camus» position implies that if there is a God, such a God would be tolerable only if God is involved in the struggle of man's existence.

It would also, they object, lead to a highly complicated and unwieldy legal system, since not only each religious community but also each sect within the community would have to be allowed full freedom to follow its own laws.

Because the path it [the dark precursor] follows is invisible and becomes visible only in reverse, to the extent that it is traveled over and covered by the phenomena it induces within the system [i.e., within an actual world], it has no place other than that from which it is «missing,» no identity other than that which it lacks: it is precisely the object = x.» (D&R 119 - 120)

So the only remaining conclusion is that the «eternal objects» have their ground in a supertemporal entity, in God, who «conceptually» holds within God's «primordial nature» the totality of possibilities for creation.

In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not just abstractly (through «eternal objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.

Scandalously to oversimplify his argument, it is, says Heidegger, the history of this nihilistic impulse to reduce being to an object of the intellect, subject to the will, that has brought us at last to the age of technology, for which reality is just so many quanta of power, the world a representation of consciousness, and the earth a mere reserve awaiting exploitation; technological mastery has become our highest ideal, and our only real model of truth.

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

This means that intentional objects have sense only in the context of a larger world - horizon which is not due to subjective constitution.

You treat people like they are only objects to be used, stepped on, objectified, abused, slandered, cheated, lied to, and then discarded, and eventually, you look around, and find that you are the one who has been discarded.

He objected that he had only acknowledged that, since the role of deaconesses in the early Church was a bit unclear, it would be good to clarify it.

with complete consistency, accords priority to actual entities is that it is only actual entities which are agents, in the primary sense I have endeavored to elucidate, all other entities being «agents» or «efficacious» only either as factors in actual entities, i.e., as contributory to the «act» of actual entities (e.g., eternal objects, prehensions, subjective forms, propositions) or as derivative from actual entities (e.g., nexus, societies).

These objections are likely to be reinforced in the minds of those who make them by the qualifications which Buber sets for the philosophical anthropologist: that he must be an individual to whom man's existence as man has become questionable, that he must have experienced the tension of solitude, and that he must discover the essence of man not as a scientific observer, removed in so far as possible from the object that he observes, but as a participant who only afterwards gains the distance from his subject matter which will enable him to formulate the insights he has attained.

That would mean that in the billions of years before the emergence of the first subject, there were only objects.

Others would refuse it the name because they regard as realistic only a theory of perception which asserts that what we perceive exists just as we perceive it independently of its being perceived, whereas I, like Whitehead, think that the object of perception really is what we perceive it to be only as what Whitehead calls an element in an actual situation that includes as other constituents not only the context but also the perceiver.

There are only a few fraternities on or off campus, and fewer than a hundred students live in them, but they have been the object of allegations of sexual assault, and students and faculty have demanded that something be done.

The only logical answer to the question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same answer initially given by the atheist or any person, to the question who will be the first person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.

Even though interest has increased, it has not been the object of an extensive study since Stauffer's Christ and the Caesars in 1955 and has only played a significant part in a handful of other...

The soundness of the underlying tradition has been questioned by certain modern writers who object, quite properly, to the weight it has been forced to bear, not only by Papias in the second century but by many exegetes and interpreters since.

One final comment: The assumption of protopsychic matter is no more revolutionary than our epistemological knowledge that all objects which we see have no color, because color only arises in sense cells and brain.

I can not prove it, and the only evidence I have is the object itself.

Only thereafter, when it has «perished» as a subject, moved away from in front of the lens, is it available as an object to be grasped at by other subjects.

One of the basic questions in regard to the problem of negative prehensions has to do with the further question as to whether they exclude only eternal objects, or feelings as well.

To believe that Humans are the predilect object of Creation and that the universe exists simply to have us in it is not only egotistical in the extreme, it limits one's ability to appreciate the incredibly unlikely set of circu.mstances that has allowed us to exist in a hostile universe.

In other words, we have just examined only a small number of the functions which the eternal object might play.

If you define these terms as mysterious objects which only your God can provide, I would agree.

In fact, he still does — though it has already been transformed and resurrected and is therefore no longer subject to the ordinary laws of our physics, which govern only mortal bodies and material objects.

If internal relations are based upon subject - object interaction only, then Whiteheadians have not really overcome a dualism which may be used to justify treating others as means rather than ends.

However, there are also indications that presentational immediacy may involve the other major kind of propositional feeling, the imaginative: «Again in the transmuted feeling only part of the original nexus maybe objectified, and the eternal object may have been derived from members of the other part of the original nexus.

This divestment (depouillement) is not only ethical but speculative; it is when the thought of the unconditioned has lost all support in the transcendent objects of metaphysics, when it has renounced all the objectifications that understanding imposes.

But no; he objects that would not be just; he'll accept the offer on the understanding that only the guilty one will become his master's slave.

For in this case he would have a special place among these objects only because of his own objective character, but not because of the very