Sentences with phrase «objects in»

Babies will often put objects in their mouth so it is important to keep potentially dangerous plants out of reach.

If your baby hasn't already started putting unfamiliar objects in his or her mouth, you'll notice it happening a lot by now.

When you read to your infant, say the names of the objects, people, and animals as you point to them, and make the sounds of the animals and the objects in the book.

The researchers found that there were more collisions with fixed objects in the Northeast, loss of consciousness was more likely to occur in terrain park users, and those in Colorado were less likely to lose consciousness after a fall.

Often, we take up these texts and objects in ways not intended or expected by producers.

She creates jewellery inspired by nature, casting objects in silver (and soon gold) that she finds on walks through the woods, along the river or by the sea.

CSKA have been charged with the setting off of fireworks and the throwing of objects in contravention of UEFA's disciplinary regulations.

Never underestimate the beauty of ordinary objects in a resonance of remembered effort and landscape.

He might even start punting random objects in his free time.

We just might be linked to inanimate objects in the future even

The objects in question are real surfboards constructed by Dean Edwards, an L.A. craftsman who has been shaping boards for 20 years.

The careful and precise identification of dangerous foreign objects in food packaging is the focus of the exhibition participation of HEUFT SYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH at Anuga FoodTec.

Initially borne of research by Swedish scientific research institute, Innventia, Södra has explored the adaptability of DuraPulp in a series of design - led commissions, including a paper - thin, waterproof chair, moulded packaging to cradle delicate objects in transit and an electric desk lamp.

The Profile Advantage series makes an impression with up to 50 percent higher detection sensitivity in the detection of metal foreign objects in wet, hot, chilled or frozen products.

I felt very attached to my house, to the objects in it, to the people who surrounded me and made it so special.

Thus, Bergson's proto - mentalism is also interpretable as the positive face of the critique of simple location.4 The fallacy of simple location is the basis for the view, in both physical and logical atomism, that the «individuality of the atom [and of objects in general] is based precisely on its [or their] ontological separation from other simply located entities» (BMP 309).

The origination in the conceptual pole necessarily involves a primordial gradation of objects in such a way that they are adjusted in a unified togetherness of valuation.

If we understand the primordial satisfaction of God to be that of the togetherness of eternal objects in valuation, then we must know that this satisfaction is a supreme harmony.

Instead of the contents of consciousness being treated as the subjective counterparts of objects in external space, Whitehead treats them as the residue resulting from natural transmutation processes that occur within that space.

This analysis of mathematics seems to be the reason for Whitehead to attach e attribute of a «particular individuality» (SMW 229) to eternal objects in his later philosophy.

In simpler language, we may state that primordial objects in the universe (grounded in an ineffable reality) are causally transformed into a limited set of cosmological, biological and cultural entities, which at the same time, allows for an endless number of creative outcomes and novel possibilities.

I suggest that the note regarding physical and scientific objects in the second edition of the Enquiry be taken as a break on Whitehead's part with the position spelled out in the body of the book insofar as that position, because of its phenomenalistic orientation, rules out the possibility of the above - mentioned type of explanation.

Objects in the world support a variety of interpretations or valuations.

Man, of course, is like one of the natural objects in the hands of man: «Their inhabitants, shorn of strength, are dismayed and confounded, and have become like plants of the field, and like tender grass, like grass on the housetops...» What is forgotten is that when the power of man is unleashed it is never in the hands of all men («man» here means some men rather than all men, and this is even more flagrantly so today).

The molecule is typical of enduring objects in the extreme similarity of the successive occasions that make it up.

How can the big, visible objects in our world obey different rules from those of the tiny, invisible stuff they are made of?

The object was then reacting with something (with the air or other objects in its surroundings) and it would still have been reacting with me if I had been in an appropriate position.

It is increasingly difficult to assign any actual content to Niebuhr's distinction between intellectual work that is done in theological schools, guided by love of God and attending to its objects in their God - relatedness, and intellectual work that is either not guided by love of God or, when it is, always attends to its object in abstraction from its God - relatedness, as must be done by definition in a secular college or university.

Since we correctly resist the idea that sticks and stones as such have subjectivity, we have been driven either to deny them any status independent of our experience or else to regard them as objects in an ontological sense.

But at another level, Whitehead locates the final supply of eternal objects in a single actual entity he calls God.

The first level is also the most abstract: the collection of all eternal objects in the divine primordial nature.

Does the unconscious prehension of all eternal objects in the primordial nature violate this principle?

Hartshorne's rejection of eternal objects in Whitehead's sense constitutes one of the main differences between him and Whitehead.

I am troubled by the idea of an unconscious appraisal of all eternal objects in relation to a possible world which is envisioned in all its detail, and Cobb does not comment explicitly on whether this appraisal is conscious or not.

Those loopholes may not be quite as large as Naumer suggests, however The bill — which focuses on tribes and not individuals or «almost any Indian» — requires that a tribe establish that an object or objects in question originated with it and come under one of the three categories — sacred object, funerary object, human remains.

Such intervention can be regular and predictable on the basis of intuitions of the order of eternal objects in the primordial nature of God and can, therefore, be taken into account in the planning and responsible free choosing of men.

Therefore, sensa and patterns do not differ in the respect that they must be essentially related to other eternal objects in physical ingression, and this aspect of their relational essences guarantees that no eternal object can physically ingress individually.

In their joint embodiment in the occasion, they relate the entire realm of eternal objects in ascending degrees of complexity to this base, thus providing the inexhaustible intelligibility of the event, its conceptual structure.

Any system of material objects in accelerated motion relative to absolute space manifests forces — the «inertial forces» — that vary in accordance with the degree of acceleration; the centrifugal force discussed above is an example.

Whitehead observes that «A pattern and a sensum are thus both simple in the sense that neither involves other specified eternal objects in its own realization» (PR 115 / 175).

Thus, though the individual essences of neither sensa nor patterns require references to other specified eternal objects, sensa presuppose no other eternal objects in their individual essences, while patterns do presuppose sensa.

This is not a formation of completely novel patterns, but rather of increasingly complex unities of eternal objects in novel patterns of external relatedness.

Insisting on the imaginative factor in the projection of sense — objects in no way implies that they are illusory — a consideration that everyday life gainsays, since often fatal material consequences ensue from representing things wrongly.

Kraus says that eternal objects «form the patterns structuring concrete fact» and «the forms structuring the togetherness of data into a datum of experience — eternal objects in Whitehead's language — are given for all times in ordered, intelligible, interrelated sets like mathematical systems» (ME 30).

In that concept, God was devoid of any physical dimension, being rather an entirely conceptual act of valuation of pure eternal objects, that is, of eternal objects in themselves, rather than as actualized in temporal actual entities.

To carry through the process of rethinking the account of actual occasions and eternal objects in the light of the full doctrine of God will be in line with the direction in which Whitehead's own thought was moving at this point and will also alter in subtle, but at times important, ways the precise form of the doctrine of God.

The units of which the world is made up were thought to be material particles which remained unchanged in themselves as they moved about in space and formed the diverse configurations which made up the physical objects in our world.

Second, God seems to envisage eternal objects in a way for which the conceptual prehensions of actual occasions provide no analogy.

Palmer always uses the term «objective» to describe the antagonistic posture of the isolated, active knower who seeks, for purposes of manipulation and control, to grasp, through the scientific method, the passive objects of the world in such a way that the knowledge that results «will reflect the nature of the objects in question rather than the knower's whims.»

«Thanks to him we know any two objects in the universe that have mass exert a gravitational pull on each other» begins an article explaining Newton's Law.