Sentences with phrase «objects made with»

While experimenting with increasingly three - dimensional canvases at the California College of Art in the late 1950s, the artist began to produce objects made with industrial materials, including plywood, sprayed lacquer, and pigmented resin, creating the highly reflective, smooth surfaces that he was to become known for.

They're objects made with paint; they provide something to look at but nothing to see.

In the 90's, he turned to object making with just enough uncanny humor that somehow the art world embraced ideas, sensations, and experiences that have always been so patently impolite one could never imagine them in a gallery, let alone a collector's home.

Not exact matches

He appeared to make some sort of gesture at the police with an object in his hand just before they ordered him to lie down on the ground and took him away.

If the first phase of 3D printing was about hulking industrial 3D printers that codified processes, and the second phase of 3D printing was about the hobbyist community using 3D printers, then the third phase, with printers like the Form 2, is about making 3D printing even more accessible by making it simple enough — and making the 3D printers small enough — so that it can go to every place where objects are designed and manufactured.

If an alien species manipulates objects, interacts with its peers and combines concepts, the cognitive approach therefore predicts there might be enough mental architecture in common to make its language accessible to humans.

To avoid falling victim to «the shiny new object effect» and ensure your tech investment makes a real impact, here are some things to think about when evaluating new sales tools — along with ideas for implementing them effectively.

Likewise, even if people are not fond of a particular post, object, person or view, the simple act of clicking like, even when done with no profound intention or conviction, can lead to a rationalization process that will subconsciously make them feel positively about that post, object, person, etc..

It would give designers more freedom, allowing them to create and test parts and devices with complex shapes that can't be made easily with any other production method — say, an intricate aluminum lattice or a metal object with internal cavities.

Not - for - profits can engage in profit - making activities as long as those activities are compatible with the not - for - profit objects of the NFP, and the profits are used exclusively for promoting its stated goals.

Psychologists have begun to recognize and understand the critical role Affect plays in people's decision - making and the manner in which our minds tag representations of objects or events with positive or negative feelings.

After making that first record, we had no confidence in our ability to make great artistic decisions, and less confidence in our ability to refrain from attacking each other with blunt objects in the studio.

Objecting to my suggestion that Merchant of Venice contains an invitation to the Queen to identify with the figure of Portia, he makes the point that Elizabeth remained single, whereas Portia marries.

In the New Testament, beginning with Jesus himself, the projection of personal destinies into the future world plainly accentuated the importance of the individual and made souls the objects of solicitude and the subjects of salvation.

(1) The concrete universal as the individual seen in conjunction with the thought structure implied in it, that which makes it an intelligible unity, is neither a naively conceived sense - object, nor an abstract logical universal.

With the definition of religion given, Marxism would have to be considered a religion, at least for those who do not use it as a means to some political or economic end, but who find «in the conception of the «dialectic of history» with its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to lifeWith the definition of religion given, Marxism would have to be considered a religion, at least for those who do not use it as a means to some political or economic end, but who find «in the conception of the «dialectic of history» with its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to lifewith its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to life....

In terms of eternal objects we may say that he reaches as far as the most distant standpoint he has made relevant by associating it with a specific eternal object (thereby perhaps making that eternal object first relevant).

Since a process made this object / whole with its analyzable spatial parts, one might assume process itself is not a whole.

What appear to be solid objects are made up of myriads of these energy events, throbbing, dynamic, interrelated and interacting, extended in space and time, with varying degrees of complexity of organization.

In former times, however, the object and situation of a free human action were simply ready - made data, presented in fact with almost static fixity and repetitiveness.

All those appliances, objects of desire, bought dearly with a multitude of payments and small sacrifices, were supposed to make life more pleasant.

As Emmanuel Levinas states: «Intentionality is not the way in which a subject tries to make contact with an object that exists beside it.

Moreover, to identify the nontemporal actual entity with some multiplicity of eternal objects is surely to blur systematic distinctions which Whitehead labored to make.

Notwithstanding the claims of the Obama administration, employers will still be facilitating the coverage to which they object, in the contracts they make with insurance companies, and in most cases will actually still be paying in full for the coverage.

For Reid it is by a «natural kind of magic» that we take them to stand for these objects; there are no grounds in experience for making this association.9 As we have seen, Whitehead disagrees with Reid in that he holds that we have a direct intuition or «feeling» of external objects as causes of sensations.

Today the shelves of Christian bookstores bulge with material that makes Charlie Shedd look like a prophetic sage (even if he did recommend only a trifling 15 minutes of exercise per day) rather than an object of easy derision.

Indeed he went to great lengths, grappled with the formidable problem of the nature of light, made incredibly subtle distinctions between various types of change, all to explain the fact that in sight consciousness is consciousness of an object, pure and simple, apart from any feelings of bodily involvement.

We never objectify an object except in an interpreted form, and this is because we objectify objects only by making them constituents of our own processes in which they must be selectively harmonized with other constituents.

The effect of the new method of philosophy instituted by Descartes and Locke was to make human mental operations and their contents the sole object of study, with the rest of nature the «unknown something» behind the veil of appearances.

Looking at and observing the object, we make it part of an objective world with which we do not enter into relationship.

My criticism of Whitehead would be that while he makes token acknowledgment of the Aristotelian principle, his concept of God as a non-temporal entity ontologically grounding the realm of eternal objects shows that his heart basically remains with Plato.

But this brings Thomas full circle to the contradiction of a wholly necessary being making a contingent decision to create its own objects of knowledge — only now there is the further problem of reconciling God's causative knowledge with human free will.

With this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the liWith this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the liwith linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the like).

The term moderate evolution might therefore be applied to a theory which simply inquires into the biological reality of man in accordance with the formal object of the biological sciences as defined by their methods and which affirms a real genetic connection between that human biological reality and the animal kingdom, but which also in accordance with the fundamental methodological principles of those sciences, can not and does not attempt to assert that it has made a statement adequate to the whole reality of man and to the origin of this whole reality.

The fact that Jesus can be made an object of historical critical research is given with the incarnation and can not be denied by faith, if the latter is to remain true to itself [The Crucified Messiah and Other Essays, 1974].

But I object to the ease with which you make the unreal skandalon — i.e. the mythology of the New Testament language — the real skandalon.

At evening time it is, with equal ceremony, locked away for the night in a specially prepared vault for safekeeping.11 It is not a little strange that a faith which rules out idolatry should have come, in the end, very near, if not quite, to making their sacred book an object of worship.

Since Jesus» teaching was closely related to the Jewish religious tradition and made use of its concepts, since he took for granted the fundamental conception of all Jewish religion, the eventual triumph of the will of God, and since his teaching is vitally concerned with the object of all prophetic hopes and predictions — in a word, since Jesus was Jewish — his religion was essentially «social.»

«The object of Jesus» command is always the same — to evoke whole - hearted faith, to make us love God and our neighbour with all our heart and soul.

Agree with you God bless the memory of PJPII... who did not wish or ask to be worshiped alive or dead, as didn't Jesus the son of Mary wish or ask before him, but still the made of him an object and now the PJPII...!!!

The resulting confusion is similar to the one that appears in political life when a particular democratic society is made the object of a devotion that genuine democracy extends only to humanity, created free and endowed with natural rights prior to any recognition of these facts.

@sirhuxley: so if we all agree that all religious books are man made whether with good intentions or of trying to rule others then the age of earth would not have to match (within 6 days) the creation of humans and we would not really be objecting to a God!?

The gospels indicate that like all humans he struggled with the temptation to self - assertion, but that he conquered the urge to make his own personality into a cult object.

With reference to Einstein, «who made time and space into fluid things that merge into each other,» Chopin suggests that the «material world» is made up of objects and events we can identify; the «transition zone» is a quantum reality or domain where energy turns into matter; and the place beyond time and space — the origin of the universe, the place where God is — is like a «virtual reality or domain.»

He explains this otherness of the universe: Cosmology, in contradistinction to astronomy and astrophysics, is rather a «universology» that deals with a single, unique totality of all, which not only can not be treated as an object and hence subjected to experimentation, but also can not be made devoid of the delimiters of human insight (p. 182).

Only then does one have what James calls «pure experience» (in the «instant field of the present,» before distinctions of subject and object have been made)(ERE 23), or what Dewey calls «an experience» (subjectively) or «that meal» (objectively)(AE 35 - 37, emphasis in original), or what Whitehead calls «the individual «It» with its own significance» (AI 262).

The sense of the kind of object to which the surrender is made has much to do with determining the precise complexion of the joy; and the whole phenomenon is more complex than any simple formula allows.

In Religion in the Making eternal objects and creativity are both (together with God) attributed the special (metaphysical) status of «formative elements.»

Where, in the standard case, the subject is internally related to the object of perception, with God it is the reverse: the subject (God) is externally related, so that his perception of the world makes no difference at all to him.

Then too, this connection opens up avenues of... the way we make objects of racism out of people who are in ideological differences with us.