Whitehead's insistence upon the organismic connectedness of things is certainly conducive to answering this question by means of analogy and metaphor, mapping in isomorphic fashion characteristics of the actual occasion onto the macrocosmic
objects of human experience.
If such talk is construed objectively, as asserting that God is in some way
the object of human experience, the fact that «God» must be understood to express a nonempirical concept means that no empirical evidence can possibly be relevant to the question of whether the concept applies and that, therefore, God must be experienced directly rather than merely indirectly through first experiencing something else.
This means, then, that God must be asserted to be in some way
the object of human experience, else the foundational theological assertions could never be established as worthy of being believed.
Not exact matches
Hatred is what they certainly project, not love for the embryos, which is a piece
of nonsense no one could
experience, but hatred, a virulent hatred for an unnamed
object... Their hatred is directed against
human beings as such, against the mind, against reason, against ambition, against success, against love, against any value that brings happiness to
human life.
In other cases this appeal alleges, not that there is any
experience of the present self which grounds all
experience of the nonself, but that the most immediate
objects of present
human experience are the immediately preceding instances
of human experience (cf., e.g., MMCL 444).
And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the
human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the
object of knowledge and
of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies
of the
human intellect and
of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.
In a summary
of Whitehead's position, mathematics is abstracted from
human experience to become ideal
objects which initially represent general things that are symbolized in classes by variables.
Indeed, to be an
object has normally meant to be an
object of human sense
experience, especially visual and tactile
experience.
This limitation
of objects to what functions in
human sense -
experience has rendered the reality
of God highly problematic, and in late modernism, belief in the objective reality
of God has been viewed as somewhat eccentric.
It is interesting to me that the most intimate
human experiences, namely tile
object ot our worship ana the
object or
human love, provide the vocabulary
of profanity.
I bring the conversation up because it came to mind last week when I was reading about a Christian ethicist so passionately committed to defending the (unmistakably) exceptional nature
of human beings that he thinks it necessary to forbid his children any sentimental solicitude for the suffering
of beasts, and to disabuse them
of the least trace
of the dangerous fantasy or pathetic fallacy that animals
experience anything analogous to
human emotions, motives, or needs; they can not really, he insists, know anxiety, grief, regret, or disappointment, and so we should never allow them to divert our sympathies or ethical longings from their proper
object.
The clockmaker God, who leaves the world - machine to run on its own, is neither an
object of worship nor a participant in
human experience, and bears little resemblance to the God
of the Bible.
To realise its being and life, and to
experience the fullness
of human experiencing, the
human person must be the subject and
object of love, for it is precisely in love that the
human person most fully actualizes itself, and thus reaches the fullest realization
of its being and life (66).
Like all intellectual activity it compares, abstracts, relates; by these means it seeks coherence in the manifoldness
of human experience, unified understanding
of the
objects or the Other in that
experience.
Humans tend to
experience I / Me / Mine and
objects of awareness as real, concrete, substantial, and permanent entities.
S. Lynneth Solis Mind, Brain, and Education Program Current city: Cambridge Current job: Doctoral Student,
Human Development and Education, Harvard Graduate School
of Education Career highlight: Collaborating with researchers at the Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Colombia to study
object play
experiences of children in socioeconomically diverse preschools in the city
Hyper - individualization does precisely what the emerging body
of research says it does and more: it isolates children, it breeds competition, it assumes that children can learn entirely on their own, and it dehumanizes the learning environment, reducing the
human experience of learning down to a mechanistic process, one where children become the
objects of learning as opposed to the subjects
of their own educational narrative.»
The desire to collect
objects and images
of personal significance, and to make connections between them, is a nearly universal
human experience.
She wishes to create links through her work to elements
of human experience, particularly by engaging with emotional
experience and familiar physical
objects which are related to themes
of nostalgia, hope, pleasure, despair and mortality.
«Central to the theme
of this exhibition is the potential
of objects to transform our
experience and understanding
of the
human condition.
Inspired by a deep appreciation for botany, mycology, and biology — fields that explore parts
of the physical world that are often hidden from
humans» perception but shape our
experiences in ways both subtle and profound — Ronay seeks to create «something that looks as if it's grown, that these aren't
objects that were necessarily made by a
human, but that they've grown themselves.»
Whiteread's casts
of everyday
objects form a quiet and powerful body
of work that fixes in form the echoes and residue
of past
human existence and
experience.
The work isn't on display at Tate Britain because it was demolished only a few months after its creation, but the ghost
of «House» lives on, and the fusion
of domestic
objects and architecture with the power
of human memory and
experience, is at the core
of every artwork produced by Whiteread in the subsequent 3 decades.
In the aptly titled exhibition, the artist introduces low relief sculptures and drawings to comment on cultural and psychological undertones
of furnitures, not only as mundane utilitarian
objects, but also as witnesses and vessels
of human experience.
Highlighting the personal investment in
objects, the show underscores the centrality
of human experience in Kounellis's oeuvre.
«History is profoundly
human, created from the
objects and events each
of us
experiences, and Arsham's work reminds us
of these important connections.
... [O] ne
of the things I try to do is to infuse into the inanimate a reference back to the whole hierarchy
of human experience beginning with the material, using
objects instead
of just paint.»
Metzinger argues that our daily perception
of the world seems effortless, as a result
of how the
human brain produces a form
of interface, a virtual reality to allow the
experience of tactile
objects, colors and duration.
In these times
of diversity and multicultural
experience, the artist's image is both a cypher for the
human condition as well as the foundation for complex iconography in which the cultural
object stands to reflect the impact
of societal norms on the individual.
All three bodies
of work demonstrate Purifoy's deep engagement with ideas about phenomenology, the
human body's
experience of space and time as negotiated through our interactions with
objects, which has been a central concern
of much 20th century art.
The works on view transcend the categories that separate drawing from sculpture, the
human from the nonhuman, and the animated from the static, while
experiences of technological devices and flatness lead to fantastic and absurd implications for
objects and space.
The
human body as subject matter became increasingly scandalous and provocative in the post-war climate, whether in Hans Bellmer's dark surrealist masterpiece Les Jeux de la Poupée, Allen Jones's typically fetishistic Waitress I, or for the body's new role as a medium
of experience,
object of analysis, and tool
of social protest through performance, seen in the Aktionism
of Gunther Brus (Patent Merde).
Sandra Ono's mixed media installations explore the
experiences of the
human body through the manipulation
of everyday
objects.
While John Armleder, Jeff Koons, Haim Steinbach, and others carry on the spirit
of Duchamp's intellectual wisecrack (while exploring issues
of commodification, the doubtfulness
of discernment, and the irrelevance
of the art / kitsch dichotomy, all addressed through a compliant stance toward the marketplace), Gober bathes his urinals, sinks, beds, doors, dog baskets, armchairs, and other furnishings in murkier, more psychologically provocative waters, transforming his roster
of everyday
objects into an iconography
of fundamental
human experience.
Gallery 101 Members will remember Dunning's solo exhibition Sapsucker Sounds from 2015, an installation
of objects and interactive sound sculptures that offered an opportunity to
experience sound generated by the conflation
of human and woodpecker culture.
Unlike typical linguistic or botanical accounts, Mc Hugh tackles the morphology
of human objects and
experience; seeking to define the underlying structures and the law
of form behind the everyday things which shape our lives.
Drawn partly from his own
experiences growing up in the American South and his years working on Submission - which highlighted orchestrated S&M practices, DeSana continued pushing the limitations
of the
human body, shifting his focus further to the body as a non-erotic, non-individualized
object, or prop.
Each
object falls under one
of four stages illuminated in the Allegory — Imagination, Belief, Thought, and Understanding — which represent the progression
of human experience.
Each
of these
objects continue the artist's trajectory examining notions
of failure, and with this pretext, examines the loaded repeat
of forms,
of minimalism, and even
of human experience.
An abstract painting doesn't purport to create the illusion
of human space, and if it does, it's not really abstract (e.g., Kandinsky's later work); therefore, it runs the risk
of being
experienced as a mere
object, like a bad figurative painting.
The subjective
experience of the observer is crucial to these works, which reflects the interdependent web
of relations between the
human,
object, and space — without settling upon any definite conclusions.