Sentences with phrase «objects seen by»

«About a third of the gamma - ray objects seen by Fermi remained unknown in the most recent catalog, and this result represents an important advance in understanding their natures,» said David Thompson, a Fermi deputy project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

Not exact matches

It cites numerous instances in which chickens were forcefully hit over the head with various objects, including a metal scraper tool and a broomstick, and details how they mishandled the hens by «roughly grabbing them by a single wing and violently shoving them into garbage cans» — which can be seen in the video.

By being able to see through the objects they handle, drivers can gain a conceptual understanding of how gases flow and troubleshoot when they don't.

People object to a system that they see as being dominated by big pharma, a system that intrusively asserts control over our lives, telling us what's wrong with us, and telling us what we must do in order to get better (as they choose to define «better»).

By 2017, we will see smart objects hitting shelves on broad scale and we will start reducing waste, costs and inconvenience while increasing efficiency and safety.

Male rosé drinkers have transformed it from a wine «seen by serious wine drinkers as cloying, mass - produced swill, an object of revulsion and gendered disdain,» as GQ wrote, into something men are happy to be seen drinking.

This was a smart move by Dion, since they can not be seen to object openly to more female participation in the party, but he may still be ousted.

You see, Newtons first law is simple fact: an object in motion stays in motion and an object out of motion stays out of motion unless acted upon by a net force.

By approbation is meant that when Muhammad saw something done, or heard words uttered in his presence and did not object, such actions or words are approved.

He then utilized terminology that for decades informed the basic stance of process theology on the nature of true power, though, as we shall see, that is open to challenge: God «persuades the world by an act of suffering with the kind of power which leaves its object free to respond in humility and love.»

As Ambrose, the fourth - century bishop of Milan, told the recently initiated: «You must not trust, then, wholly to your bodily eyes; that which is not seen is more really seen, for the object of sight is temporal, but that other eternal, which is not apprehended by the eye, but is discerned by the mind and spirit» (Ambrose of Milan, De mysteriis, III, 15).

At times, even to this day as we have seen, they understand the beautiful, the valuable, the purposeful as mere projections of our own «subjective» desires and wishes back onto the blank indifference of the material objects abstracted by science.

«Eternal» objects are not eternal, but created and everlastingly inherited by many others — by all successive others when divine mediation is included (see «Hartshorne, God and Metaphysics»).

I can therefore see an object in so far as objects form a system or a world, and in so far as each one treats the others round it as spectators of its hidden aspects which guarantee the permanence of those aspects by their presence.

Now if I make a space - time diagram of a particle at rest whose boundaries are given by two lines and then suddenly accelerate it to another velocity, I see that if I push on one side of the object it immediately responds on the other side.

We saw that for Farley theological inquiry is defined as precisely theological by the nature of its subject matter (or «object» of inquiry)-- namely, faith - within - its - situations.

By making language use its central object of study contemporary philosophy seems to have committed itself to an even more extreme form of that same anthropocentric orientation that Whitehead saw himself as combating.

For Reid it is by a «natural kind of magic» that we take them to stand for these objects; there are no grounds in experience for making this association.9 As we have seen, Whitehead disagrees with Reid in that he holds that we have a direct intuition or «feeling» of external objects as causes of sensations.

We believe that this representation of the structure of eternal objects by Prolog programs could be a helpful tool for further analysis of Whitehead's discussion of the structure of eternal objects (see SMW, chapter 11).

I can not see that it is.12 Why should we suppose that a deity with unrealized potentialities and contingent properties, and qualified by His cognitive relations with contingent objects, must be in relation with some world of entities other than Himself?

Projecting one's own beliefs to society at large, even going so far as to make up false resons that can not be backed up by fact, «women are seen as objects», as to why others should do the same, is just plain odd.

But he became hungry and was desiring to eat; but while they were making preparations, HE FELL INTO A TRANCE; and he saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground, and there were in it all kinds of four - footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air.

Acts 11:4 - 18: «But Peter began speaking and proceeded to explain to them in orderly sequence, saying, «I WAS IN THE CITY OF JOPPA PRAYING; AND IN A TRANCE I SAW A VISION, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the aSAW A VISION, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the asaw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the air.

This is because eternal objects can not convey a sense of the individuality of the past actual entities which are being objectified by a new actual entity (see PR 229f.

I don't see how anyone could object very strenuously to this, provided (as Nussbaum does provide) that «rules and formal decision procedures, including procedures inspired by economics,» are not supplanted but rather supplemented and corrected by the emotional knowledge provided in literature; and provided also that we caution ourselves against using emotional affect frivolously and sentimentally.

That man can see, analyze the determinists that press on him attest8 to the fact that be can envisage them simply as objects confronting him and, by seeing them in this way, act as a free man.

It will be seen by now that «B as Tonic» — as a limited set of two eternal objects — is itself a complex eternal object made up of the related components «B» and «tonic.»

It is caused by the attachment of desire to specific objects... [and he adds] As we shall see, the relationship between attachment and addiction is not as simple as it might sound.

Because the breasts have been made only object for pleasure by «ordinary» guys, that is all they can see.

«The best view is by no means the closest view... we consciously stand back and create distance in order to look at the world, i.e., at objects as parts of the world: and also to be unembarrassed by the closeness of that which we wish only to see; to have the full liberty of our scanning attention.»

By the same token, you can not see an object in two places at the same time.

Even the recent history of pastoral care by E. Brooks Holifield sees women, slaves and «others» primarily as the objects of care, rarely as caregivers and never as the source of new ideas.

We strongly object, however, to what we see as the misuse of the First Amendment, by commercial interests, as a cover for a quest for profit.

The NCC objects to what they see as the misuse of the First Amendment, by commercial interests, as a cover for a quest for profit.

By considering the simplest instance of the physical ingression of eternal objects as in the case of two sensa (PR 115 / 176f), we see that the physical ingression of any eternal object requires the concurrent ingression of at least two other nonidentical eternal objects so that an actual contrast obtains.

He saw that much of our lives is controlled by religious, educational, governmental, and business institutions, and he rightly objected that most social analysis neglects these.

DE: In the earlier books the ontological units were events characterized by objects (though we have seen these events can be abstractions from durations).

By contrast, the instrumental account sees them as arising from perception of the usefulness of objects.

People's conditionning in consumerism in subtle ways is changing the theological concept of faith, so that in certain theologies God is seen not so much as the object of service and obedience but as a convenient device by which one's religious needs are met.

One advantage that a broader duration will have over the briefer durations with which it is contemporaneous is its capacity to sum up successive briefer duration; making them simultaneous.22 We have already seen that this is Bergson's explanation of the manner in which the successive «vibrations» of objects around us are transformed by us into stable, unchanging surfaces.

Intellectual activity motivated by such interests may indeed make Ultimate Being and man its objects of study and so seem to share in the thought of the Church; but insofar as it is directed by a love that is not love of Being and of man it can not see or understand what love understands.

While some still object to cells being taken from animals and used by scientists to grow clean meat in laboratories — and some just don't like the idea of eating a «cultured» steak created by men and women in white coats — others see the lab - grown meat revolution as key to solving the environmental crisis linked to meat eating.

You stimulate your baby by talking to her, touching her, being affectionate, showing her the world around her, and introducing objects for her to see, feel, taste, and experience.

October 11: Children ages 3 - 8 can celebrate National Fossil Day by learning how fossils form, making imprints of natural objects, and seeing real fossils up close (Boston)

You'll see that at about 9 months most babies understand the concept of object permanence (that an object still exists, even when they can't see it), and that by their first birthday most children can non-verbally communicate their desires.

By not exposing your sons — whether by breastfeeding them or having them see babies breastfeeding — to the fact that breasts are made to feed babies, they are more likely to view breasts only as sexual objects later oBy not exposing your sons — whether by breastfeeding them or having them see babies breastfeeding — to the fact that breasts are made to feed babies, they are more likely to view breasts only as sexual objects later oby breastfeeding them or having them see babies breastfeeding — to the fact that breasts are made to feed babies, they are more likely to view breasts only as sexual objects later on.

Your baby can't see very far yet, so play games with him by holding objects that are brightly colored or high - contrast near his face.

If scientific advancements someday make breastfeeding by men a common practice, I know plenty of tired nursing moms who won't object to sharing the duty... even if that means being dragged to see a «Brad Titt» movie or two.

Babies this age can focus on shapes that are close by, but see distant objects as blurry because they are nearsighted.

Toddlers can often be seen grouping objects together by size, color, and other similar features.