Sentences with phrase «objects seen from»

Thus far I have mostly referred to paintings that encompass a range of objects seen from a middle distance, the one centered on an oozing tube of daffodil oil color being the exception.

Always focused on the overview of the objects seen from different perspectives depending on color, line, or texture, it was natural that his acquaintance with Picasso resulted in such an explosion of innovations.

Not exact matches

The video, taken from the cockpit camera, shows a glowing object traveling at high speeds while rotating and includes audio of Navy pilots struggling to process what they are seeing.

Creativity isn't always about creating something from scratch, but about seeing multiple uses for one idea (or object).

Many people think that the Great Wall of China is the only man - made object that can be seen from space.

Male rosé drinkers have transformed it from a wine «seen by serious wine drinkers as cloying, mass - produced swill, an object of revulsion and gendered disdain,» as GQ wrote, into something men are happy to be seen drinking.

A person involved in the investigation said, however, that experts from Boeing and the National Transportation Safety Board who had seen the object, a piece of what is known as a flaperon, were not yet fully satisfied, and called for further analysis.

There are parents who object to the «Battle Hymn of the Republic» because they either see it as «religious» in nature, or because they are from south of the Mason - Dixon line and are still fighting the War of Northern Aggression.

If a person is suffering from hallucinations it may not mean that the object is there but you can not state that they do not see it.

He guides persons and objects from within as the soul directs the body (see 1:399).

One can see here the connection between the internal relation between eternal objects, and the fact that from the standpoint of the prehending occasion, its datum, as a logical subject placed within a functional context, is internally related to it.

The value of faith stems not from the irrationality of its object but from the humility that is required to see the truth which is accepted, and the courage required to act upon it.

From this standpoint we can see why it is inadequate to describe the agape of God only as the spontaneous, unmotivated, uncalculated self - giving of the Holy God, regardless of the value of its object.

(You can see this from the way in which the light waves from the whole object come into each part of the hologram.)

Heidegger and Whitehead both see that subjective experience has wrongly been envisioned in past philosophy in terms of models derived from objects of sense - experience.

These may then be seen as the objects of Christian mission, for heathens need to be saved from darkness, ignorance and sin.

We should emphasize the unity of God and see the «natures» as abstractions, descriptions from particular viewpoints of how God as a whole functions in relation to the world and to the eternal objects.

On the face of it Santayana rejects all three of these departures from the tradition, since (1) he makes no very explicit move from a continuant to an event ontology, (2) regards the inherent nature of an object as a matter of the individual eternal essence which it actualizes and (3) regards the distinction between matter and form as at least a virtually inevitable way of expressing the obscure manner in which one state of things takes over from another (see RB 278 - 284).

It is at the opposite pole from seeing the client, or oneself, as an object.

Seen in the light of Buber's dialogical philosophy, this is nothing other than the attempt of subject - object, or I - It, knowledge to dismiss the ontological reality of the I - Thou knowing from which it derives its own existence.

The wordless counting involves two capacities, the first being «seeing numbers» or choosing the object with a certain number of points on it from among a group of objects with points differing in number, size, color and arrangement.

Could one «prove» my friend's story about the object he saw come down from the sky?

Acts 11:4 - 18: «But Peter began speaking and proceeded to explain to them in orderly sequence, saying, «I WAS IN THE CITY OF JOPPA PRAYING; AND IN A TRANCE I SAW A VISION, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the aSAW A VISION, an object coming down like a great sheet lowered by four corners from the sky; and it came right down to me, and when I had fixed my gaze on it and was observing it I saw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the asaw the four - footed animals of the earth and the wild beasts and the crawling creatures and the birds of the air.

(CNN)- A statue resembling the goddess Athena and jewelry bearing images from Greco - Roman mythology may not be objects you'd expect to see in a museum exhibit of Buddhist art from Pakistan.

I think that as women we tend to see ourselves as sexual objects because that is how society sees us; thus we learn to dissociate our «real» selves from our bodies.

(d) As we saw from the quotation from Bachofen, mythical symbolism differs from other forms of speech in that it offers an all - embracing view of its object.

God is seen as envisaging all the eternal objects as well as all actual occasions, but Whitehead does not see this envisagement as fundamentally different in kind from that possible to other occasions.

In doing so, he shifts the initiative for perception's causation from God to the individual object, or cosmic event, to see it in his terms.

Indeed, the development from 40.6 b onwards, that is based on the notion of God as the conceptual valuation of eternal objects, can be seen as expanding on the notion of the timeless but actual entity of Process 40.3b - 6a.

Far from being nonsense that the object of perception should cause us to see it, it is a major feature of Hartshorne's world - view.

Consequently, it is incorrect to interpret Newton as maintaining that absolute space and absolute time can be measured without reference to some material objects, that absolute space and absolute time are real existents apart from all material objects, and that absolute space and absolute time are founded on essentially metaphysical considerations (see part I of Toulmin's two - part essay).

Upon reflection it may be seen that this «law of multiple ingression» traces its roots directly from Whitehead's attribution of relational essences to all eternal objects and is implicit in PR 114 - 15 / 174 - 76).4

Similarly, when we look into the depths of the clear sky, what we actually see is an unspecifiable total ground of movement, from which objects emerge.

Seen alternately from the conceptual perspective of existentialism, this mode of being in the world is what is called «bad faith» or «inauthenticity»: the attempt, often profoundly successful, to act as if one were a thing, an impenetrable object — the self that «need be no more original than a stone» (PR 159).

In a few thousand years of recorded history, we went from dwelling in caves and mud huts and tee - pees, not understanding the natural world around us, or the broader universe, to being able to travel through space, using reason to ferret out the hidden secrets of how the world works, from physics to chemistry to biology, we worked out the tools and rules underpinning it all, mathematics, and now we can see objects that are almost impossibly small, the very tiniest building blocks of matter, (or at least we can examine them, even if you can't «see» them because you're using something other than your eyes and photons to view them) to the very farthest objects, the planets circling other, distant stars, that are in their own way, too small to see from here, like the atoms and parts of atoms themselves, detected indirectly, but indisputably THERE.

DE: In the earlier books the ontological units were events characterized by objects (though we have seen these events can be abstractions from durations).

By contrast, the instrumental account sees them as arising from perception of the usefulness of objects.

But precisely, with this talk of «eternal objects,» as Whitehead clearly sees, we abstract completely from the process, from the unalterable uniqueness of felt occasions, and from the singularity of the occasion in the act of feeling.

While some still object to cells being taken from animals and used by scientists to grow clean meat in laboratories — and some just don't like the idea of eating a «cultured» steak created by men and women in white coats — others see the lab - grown meat revolution as key to solving the environmental crisis linked to meat eating.

The crowd came to see the eastern debut of Silky Sullivan, and the way the ladies stormed the paddock shrieking such non-Thoroughbred remarks as, «Oh, you darling creature,» and, «You are pure heaven, Silky boy,» a refugee from the nightclub circuit would have been convinced that the object of this attention must be either Sinatra or Presley.

As you can see below, the Buckeyes have crossed out the letter «M» in several objects, but missed one in their tweet (the word «from»).

Even though Smith is the smaller guy, I kept getting this crazy visual as I watched Smith run that fade route over and over, seeing White doing everything short of hitting Smith with a foreign object, WWE style, to try to prevent him from catching the ball.

It is also kind of what you would expect from an «object», rather than a person — the lack of empathy and inability to see all sides of the coin.

You will see hanging cords, tablecloths and objects that look especially interesting from below.

At this point, he may be able to recognize an object after seeing only part of it — like his favorite toy peeking out from under a blanket.

In the first 1 - 3 months of life, your baby is nearsighted and is best able to see objects close up (8 - 10» from her face).

See how the sense of smell helps babies bond with their family, be wary of strangers from friends, recognize comfort objects, e...

Babies who are teething are constantly chewing and sucking on objects to relieve pain, so any drooling you see is from salivary glands working overtime while your baby chews.

See if she follows the object with her uncovered eye as you move it from side to side and up and down.

Once she can pick things up, she'll want to grab everything she sees, so it's a good idea to keep dangerous and valuable objects out of her reach from now on.