Sentences with phrase «objects seen only»

Not exact matches

Many people think that the Great Wall of China is the only man - made object that can be seen from space.
God includes all actual entities within himself only as prehended objects (See IWM 403 - 9).
For it is only when it is plainly seen that the great purpose is the building of the universal Kingdom of God, and that the object of human living is the development of the human spirit, that the irrelevance of such things as material success becomes apparent.
From this standpoint we can see why it is inadequate to describe the agape of God only as the spontaneous, unmotivated, uncalculated self - giving of the Holy God, regardless of the value of its object.
In entering into relation with its mother the child completes this distance, and it is only later when he ceases to enter into relation that he sees her as an object and falls into the I - It's shaping and elaboration of the distance.
«The «primordial nature» of God is the concrescence of a unity of conceptual feelings» (PR 134), which «achieves, in its unity of satisfaction, the complete conceptual valuation of all eternal objects» (PR 48) or pure forms, thereby generating the entire structuring of pure possibility.4 Seen in terms of his everlasting aspect or consequent nature, however, the only way God is directly related to the World, the converse is true.
One final comment: The assumption of protopsychic matter is no more revolutionary than our epistemological knowledge that all objects which we see have no color, because color only arises in sense cells and brain.
Hmmm, a quick google and every result I see for «farthest observable object speed of light» says that they're only moving at 90 % of c.
Humanity is seen as the real purpose of creation, the only real object of God's love.
Because the breasts have been made only object for pleasure by «ordinary» guys, that is all they can see.
«The best view is by no means the closest view... we consciously stand back and create distance in order to look at the world, i.e., at objects as parts of the world: and also to be unembarrassed by the closeness of that which we wish only to see; to have the full liberty of our scanning attention.»
In expressing his naturalism Piaget kept his theory on a level of pure immanence, unlike Whitehead, who appealed to a timeless transcendent realm of ideas («eternal objects»), Piaget saw «forms» only as the constructions of natural subjects, and he wanted to explain this construction as a process of self - regulation.
Hence, I will only point out very briefly some of the ways in which Whitehead's metaphysical ideas, and his related understanding of the objects of physics, form a foundation for seeing inorganic, living, and conscious organisms within one scheme of thought.
What we see when we illuminate only a small area of the photographic plate is not a partial image but a whole image somewhat less sharply defined in detail, There is no one - to - one correspondence between object and image.
It may be readily seen that Lango's interpretation leans heavily upon a consistent usage of «realization» in these passages that is taken as univocally synonymous for «ingression,» along with the further assumption that ingression is a doctrine that only deals with the admission of eternal objects into actuality in some one given way.
Like Mehta, Lewis objected to God on the basis of the evil he saw in the world, but his conversion mirrored that of Leah's as he realised that his objection only made sense if a moral realm existed: «My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.
I've seen you object in comments to parents who say they only needed a few nights or even 15 minutes of CIO to get to a child who cries less and sleeps much better.
By not exposing your sons — whether by breastfeeding them or having them see babies breastfeeding — to the fact that breasts are made to feed babies, they are more likely to view breasts only as sexual objects later on.
People are seen as interchangeable objects, existing only to serve the child.
At this point, he may be able to recognize an object after seeing only part of it — like his favorite toy peeking out from under a blanket.
Separation anxiety usually happens once a baby grasps the idea of object permanence — that there's only one of you and when she can't see you, you've gone away.
Unlike a baby on its back (who sees only the ceiling and objects on either side) a baby in a wrap or other carrier will lift his / her head and view the world at eye level.
Some people only associate a breast as a sexual object instead of it's purpose for feeding, so they may find it weird or bothersome to see an older looking baby or toddler at the breast.
While early on in her first month, your baby could only focus on things that were about a foot away from her face, she now sees objects clearly that are several feet away.
Newborns are nearsighted and can only see objects that are at most 15 inches away from them.
«On trade union donations, it is hard to see what the Conservatives object to in Sir Hayden's draft proposals - the rules clearly state that donations from trade unions will only be exempt from the cap if they can be clearly linked to an individual and subject to an audit trail.
Dr Simon Vaughan, Reader in Observational Astronomy at the University of Leicester's Department of Physics and Astronomy, explained: «The seemingly random fluctuations we see from the black holes and white dwarfs look remarkably similar to those from the young stellar objects — it is only the tempo that changes.»
If they only see the object without having to step over with the front legs, their memory of it fades after a few seconds after it is removed.
In much the same way, it is possible to imagine shapes in higher dimensions, but we 3 - D creatures can see only 3 - D objects that represent small slivers of complete four - dimensional objects.
However, a dark room in which a person can see only the object removes many of the brain's tools for judging distance.
They were given only 1.5 seconds, long enough to see the ellipses but too short to count them, and then were asked to guess how many objects were there.
By comparing what was seen from different sites the team could reconstruct not only the shape and size of the object itself but also the shape, width, orientation and other properties of the newly discovered rings.
Normally, you only see quantum - mechanical jiggling when you look at objects the size of atoms and molecules, but we are moving into a domain where we see the centers of mass of these big mirrors jiggle quantum - mechanically.
Only then could scientists consider making more complicated, three - dimensional assemblies for applications such as true - color holographic displays or Harry Potter — style invisibility cloaks that make people and objects we can see disappear.
«Micro-scale 3D models are an important tool for many areas of science, but for most micro or nano - scale objects only a portion of the object can be seen in the field of view,» says Gopala Mulukutla, a research scientist in the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space at UNH and the study's lead author.
Not only were the objects near the ecliptic at perihelia, but their perihelia were physically clustered in space (see diagram, above).
Not only will it need to process wide - angle images, but it will need to do so rapidly, concentrating light efficiently enough to capture, within seconds, objects less than one - millionth the brightness of what can be seen with the naked eye.
Of course, military pilots aren't the only ones with extensive experience looking at objects in the sky — and the equipment to record what they see.
We can't see it, we can't touch it and we know it's there only by the gravitational pull it exerts on cosmic objects.
«Next, we want to see if we can do the same with not only fear memories but pleasure memories or memories of objects or memories of other mice.»
Despite only being a few metres across, the object was spotted a day before impact by the Mount Lemmon Observatory near Tucson, Arizona (see Space rock found on collision course with Earth).
They are the only class of object which can be easily detected beyond 10000 light years because they can be seen with infrared and radio telescopes.
This object was certainly known to medevial Persian astronomers before 905 A.D., and cataloged and described by Persian astronomer Al Sufi in 964 A.D.. All other galaxies have been discovered only after the invention of the telescope: The Triangulum Galaxy M33 was first seen by Italian Priest astronomer G.B. Hodierna before 1654.
For instance, when a person sees a clock, only a small number of neurons become active, enough to do pattern matching that draws upon the brain's memory of a clock and compares it with the object's basic features — its round shape, the presence of numbers — to draw a conclusion that this thing is a clock.
Any attempt to see through this retina is only successful as long as the object behind it is in the closest proximity to this tissue, clearly indicating strong interaction of light with the tissue, that would not occur in a truly transparent medium, such as the homogeneous and isotropic vitreous humor (Fig. 1, right).
Synchronous rotation can occur as a result of tidal forces from gravitational interactions between two orbiting bodies (Earth's moon is an example of an object in synchronous rotation, so that we only ever see one side from the ground).
A new analysis of galaxy colors, however, indicates that the farthest objects in the deep fields must be extremely intense, unexpectedly bright knots of blue - white, hot newborn stars embedded in primordial proto - galaxies that are too faint to be seen even by Hubble's far vision — as if only the lights on a distant Christmas tree were seen and so one must infer the presence of the whole tree (more discussion at: STScI; and Lanzetta et al, 2002).
This object is seen when the universe was only 800 million years old, corresponding to 6 % of its present age.
The object, a galaxy called MACS0647 - JD, is 13.3 billion light years from Earth and can only be seen with the help of a lens of intergalactic proportions.
The thing is, when you look at an object, whether it be a chair, a flower, or a piece of fruit, you're only seeing the physical part of the atom, which is not even 1 percent of it!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z