Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to
objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not
speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological
language about God corresponds to his statement of
several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.