Sentences with phrase «objects you have at»

There are a few ways for you to relieve the pain naturally using objects you have at home.

This object has at least four fifths the mass of Jupiter and orbits at a distance of about 25 million kilometers.

The object has at least 8.6 times the mass of Jupiter, with a similar diameter (about 11 times that of Earth).

Castle Crashers isn't your average beat»em up where you go from left to right pummeling your enemies to death with whatever sword or blunt object you have at your disposal.

How long before every social object has at least one «Like» in the new -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

The software, which has been in the works for years, allows developers to place virtual objects in the world when you look at it through your iPhone's camera.

It was aimed at critics of the deal known as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, including left - leaning politicians in Europe as well as the clamouring anti-trade civil society movement, as an «unambiguous statement» to assuage concerns over «provisions that have been the object of public debate and concerns.»

Study after study has been done that shows when we're presented with extrinsic motivators — a performance evaluation, a stats counter, a grade at the end off a class — these motivators actually become shiny objects that conceal our own intrinsic reasons for doing it.

Britain, which understandably objects to having its sovereignty violated for an assassination attempt with a flashy Soviet - era nerve agent, would appear to be in good company this week: at least 24 nations expelled Russian diplomats Monday in a show of solidarity against the Kremlin's likely poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yuliya in Salisbury earlier this month.

We've been seduced by Steve Jobs: he lifts another shiny object over his head with a new eco-friendly feature and we all melt like screaming schoolgirls at Shea Stadium in» 65.

Sometimes a package can have an unusual shape (you'd be surprised at the variety of shapes and objects the Post Office will allow you to mail, including coconuts!).

The sources said Pruitt's decision to put Greenwalt in charge of his international travel, which came just months into his tenure at EPA, fit a pattern of Pruitt assigning the most sensitive responsibilities to his small cadre of aides who had previously worked with him in Oklahoma before he became EPA administrator — aides who sources said were more likely to acquiesce to his demands, even as other EPA staffers objected to Pruitt's spending and travel decisions.

Yet it is government - created backlogs and delays and tight new rules that are the problem here, even if that very government has pointed the finger at its own employees on occasion to cover up its poor decision - making, and gone after conscientious whistle - blowers who object to being ordered to treat EI claimants unfairly.

He objected that the issue of contraception was «superfluous» compared to others; he asked what right the priest had to tell him what to do («judge not lest you be judged,» Hannity instructed); and he expressed shock at the thought that anyone might deprive him of taking Communion just because he was deciding for himself what it means to be Catholic.

Indeed, those who have argued that the figure of the emperor is a sustained concern of any part of the New Testament have often found themselves the object of ridicule and their interest regarded as, at best, somewhat eccentric (an example of this can be seen in R. P. Martin's remarks about Karl Bornhäuser's Jesus imperator mundi in the former's Carmen Christi).

The Court held that where a prohibition on the exercise of religion «is not the object... but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended» (494 US at 878).

It would be like saying objects fall to the earth at random, not that there was some force involved.

With the definition of religion given, Marxism would have to be considered a religion, at least for those who do not use it as a means to some political or economic end, but who find «in the conception of the «dialectic of history» with its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to life....

God does in fact treat us as subjects — that is as those having their own agency — but many preach a gospel in which we have been reduced to objects forced to live life in according to some divinely mapped - out and pre-ordained «plan», or to be the at the mercy of divine manipulation.

At times, even to this day as we have seen, they understand the beautiful, the valuable, the purposeful as mere projections of our own «subjective» desires and wishes back onto the blank indifference of the material objects abstracted by science.

Scandalously to oversimplify his argument, it is, says Heidegger, the history of this nihilistic impulse to reduce being to an object of the intellect, subject to the will, that has brought us at last to the age of technology, for which reality is just so many quanta of power, the world a representation of consciousness, and the earth a mere reserve awaiting exploitation; technological mastery has become our highest ideal, and our only real model of truth.

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

He understood our pervasive anxiety, our inability to be happy with all the objects we have become so expert at acquiring, our perverse desire to observe bad news and catastrophe and other people's tragedies — in a word, our alienation.

But you point to a different set of people, Ross, that should have objected to the war at the beginning and are now declaring that they are empowered by the Republicans» defeat on Tuesday: old conservatives of the Reagan and Bush - I eras, such as Brent Scowcroft or George Will.

If it is not our collective business to settle theological arguments, why are we creating statutes and committing state resources in support of a practice that rests on the opposite assumption — the assumption that there is no God, or at all events no God who would object to suicide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia?

If an object is thought of as being at a certain point, you have lost your mental grasp of its movement.

Even so, I too was taken aback at first by the statements to which he objects so strenuously -» liberals... would love to make every woman a whore» and embrace the goal of «Every gal a slut.»

At ten I had objected so violently to the dancing lessons she'd wanted me to take that I escaped them — but not the various junior high semiformal dances and high school proms where I spent each endless, unnatural, awkward hour dying for release.

But for a goodly while now I have been wondering why a segment of American Protestantism — partly informed by Tillich — can not grasp the anger of blacks at being used as objects.

If such were the case, it would not be a doctrine of objectification at all, since actual entities would not be objects but merely causes.

Each sense has its peculiar object, but the sense of being affected by the object is an integral and basic part of sensing in general — at least in its more basic forms.

Whereas Aristotle, as we have seen, took the first factor to be peculiar to conscious experience and the second to be the more general factor lying at the base of consciousness, Whitehead took the subject - object structure as general and fundamental and interpreted causal efficacy in terms of it.

As we sit at our desks or walk to class, the immediate faces and objects around us seem far more real than do the aspirations we have for ourselves in the future or even the fleeting images that may come to mind from last summer's vacation.

The object of supreme devotion has many names — or, perhaps better still, no name at all, for to name is to limit and confine and thus to negate the very ultimacy one seeks to affirm.

In my case the subject has struck a new path and is not at all conscious of the duality of his act; in him life is not split into an object and subject, or into acting and acted.

At this point Cobb might be tempted to make one last ditch stand, arguing that I have begged the question by merely assuming that a structured society can not be an enduring object, whereas what he is saying, when he says that one regional standpoint can include another, is that one enduring entity, one nonspatial, serially ordered society, can still be a structured society in that its temporally successive occasions can include the regional standpoints of the «narrower» actual entities which make up its subordinate societies and / or nexus.

On reflection we can see that the above argument for the internal relatedness of God as cognitive subject presupposes that there are alternative possibilities for God, at least with respect to what creatures, or what states of creatures, He has as objects of knowledge.

Now if it could be shown that Whitehead means the same thing by «event» that he means by «enduring object,» then Cobb would have his point, but (a) there are no grounds I can find at all to ground such an equivalence, and (b) quite to the contrary, «events» can be, though they need not be, spatially extended.

This way of putting the connection would seem somewhat strange to those who promoted art as a substitute for religion at the turn of the century, however, for it exhibits a consciousness both about the art object and about the language of religion and art which had not yet informed criticism or religion.

He had long explored the complexities of human nature in history and society, but in this book he turned the problem around and looked at the subject which was involved, turning from the objective self which most analysts look at to the subjective self behind the object.

I long for a society in which modernity would have its full place but without implying the denial of elementary principles of human and familial ecology; for a society in which the diversity of ways of being, of living, and of desiring is accepted as fortunate, without allowing this diversity to be diluted in the reduction to the lowest common denominator, which effaces all differentiation; for a society in which, despite the technological deployment of virtual realities and the free play of critical intelligence, the simplest words — father, mother, spouse, parents — retain their meaning, at once symbolic and embodied; for a society in which children are welcomed and find their place, their whole place, without becoming objects that must be possessed at all costs, or pawns in a power struggle.

Moriz Winternitz, who objects to Kern's predated quotations for the earlier sources, would date the original form of the book at about A.D. 200.

Only thereafter, when it has «perished» as a subject, moved away from in front of the lens, is it available as an object to be grasped at by other subjects.

Thus when a new subject, a new moment of experience, «A,» grasps at an object «B» (itself, so to speak, an ex-subject, a moment of experience that has perished), what happens is that A makes its own an element or «feeling» which formerly belonged to the subjectivity of B, wherein it was perhaps an insignificant, perhaps a decisive, element.

Thus in this first step we have objectification and generalization: the visible object is permanent (unlike the word), and is at our disposition.

As for the conclusion of Aidan O'Neill QC, that schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who refuse to use stories or textbooks promoting same - sex marriage and that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their children from lessons, does that sound at all unlikely, given the cases of the Strasbourg four, which were considered by the European Court of Justice in September?

She objects to the suggestion that «students who, at least in the case of commencements, have no recourse to meaningful and respectful debate ought to simply listen without objection or response to a speaker whose ideas offend them.»

Perhaps many people have been discouraged from reading a Mahayana sutra by its — at times exceptionally extensive — enumeration of names and objects, its profusion of numbers and stereotyped concepts, and its eternal repetitions.

Objects may have originally been conceived of as events, and our view may be a much later way of looking at them.

Take, bless, break, give — the bread was taken and offered to God; thanksgiving was said over it — and here we need to recall that for the Jew, all blessings have always been in the form of a thanksgiving to God for the objects which are to be blessed; the bread was broken, as Christ had done at the Last Supper and as His physical body was broken on the Cross; the bread was given — distributed, so that the believer might partake of it and thereby, as the Church believed, partake of Christ Himself and become one with Him.