«In a universe with no dark energy, massive
objects would just keep growing, which results in more gravitational lensing,» says Sudeep Das of the University of California, Berkeley.
And then there are the colored shells from Cueva de los Aviones, a sea cave in southern Spain, where Hoffmann's uranium - thorium dating of a calcite crust covering
the objects has just yielded an age of more than 115,000 years.
These exact loafers are no longer available, but I saw some similar ones here and here and if money were
no object I would just have to try these!
You have a folio that brings up a brief description of
the object you have just collected.
The application also has support for the live wallpaper feature for
objects you have just digitally scanned.
Not exact matches
To elevate the «
just things» into covetable
objects, they need to
have an authentic story.
Baxter, on the other hand,
would have to perform any of a range of tasks with whatever
object was placed in front of it, and it
would have to learn one of those tasks in
just minutes.
«I realized,» he says in an interview, «that if you generalized what a public intellectual does to [creating] media
objects» — i.e., not
just books and essays — «then one could possibly create software companies that
had public intellectual impact.»
The thinking here is that shareholders may
have been
objecting not
just to Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit's US$ 15 million dollar pay, but also to the $ 10 million retention payment awarded to him, and the general lack of correlation between Pandit's pay and the company's financial performance.
When designing products for your line, keep in mind that a product isn't
just a physical
object made of such - and - such material, weighing so many pounds, and
having particular dimensions and colors.
They all
have lots of objectives, but it's about helping them measuring back to that
object, not
just awareness but what kind of awareness, not
just impressions but what are they actually going to do for you or for the brand, the business, are you changing the hearts and minds of the customer?
The sources said Pruitt's decision to put Greenwalt in charge of his international travel, which came
just months into his tenure at EPA, fit a pattern of Pruitt assigning the most sensitive responsibilities to his small cadre of aides who
had previously worked with him in Oklahoma before he became EPA administrator — aides who sources said were more likely to acquiesce to his demands, even as other EPA staffers
objected to Pruitt's spending and travel decisions.
There is no physical
object in play,
just debt that
has been created via our modern central banks.
The newly - proposed course description for â $ ˜Financial Economicsâ $ ™, still contained among its contents the â $ ˜testing the efficiency of markets.â $ ™ When I
objected to this, given the financial meltdown that we
had just witnessed and the irrefutable evidence that this theory did not hold water, I was told that the theory of efficient financial markets still
had to be tested to decide of its real - world relevance.
If the
objecting employer is self - insured, it
just has to inform its plan administrator, which will arrange for free contraception coverage for employees.
Just because that something is the second brightest object in the night sky and you've probably seen it just about every single night of your entire life is no excuse for not saying someth
Just because that something is the second brightest
object in the night sky and you
've probably seen it
just about every single night of your entire life is no excuse for not saying someth
just about every single night of your entire life is no excuse for not saying something.
He
objected that the issue of contraception was «superfluous» compared to others; he asked what right the priest
had to tell him what to do («judge not lest you be judged,» Hannity instructed); and he expressed shock at the thought that anyone might deprive him of taking Communion
just because he was deciding for himself what it means to be Catholic.
Actually, maybe they DO
have respect for other people, and they
just object to the blatant disrespect FROM Christians towards anyone who isn't Christian.
Instead of four types of
objects, he now
had just two, eternal and enduring, yet the function of these
objects was basically the same.
But
just because eternal
objects bear no sign of their origin need not mean that they
have no origin.
In order to interpret this core - principle of revelation, we must understand its essential presupposition; namely, that events are present «in» other events - present not
just abstractly (through «eternal
objects»), i.e., mediated by the «general,» but as singular events that effect their further history by their unique concreteness (PR 338).12 Whitehead recognizes precisely this constellation when he says:» [T] he truism that we can only conceive in terms of universals
has been stretched to mean that we can only feel in terms of universals.
Scandalously to oversimplify his argument, it is, says Heidegger, the history of this nihilistic impulse to reduce being to an
object of the intellect, subject to the will, that
has brought us at last to the age of technology, for which reality is
just so many quanta of power, the world a representation of consciousness, and the earth a mere reserve awaiting exploitation; technological mastery
has become our highest ideal, and our only real model of truth.
I don't
object to God and the Bible being the ultimate authority in my life,
just the incorporated church that
has changed the facts about both of the above.
He is the ruler of the church
just as He
had been the leader of His little band of followers: He is the head (or, we
would say, the heart) of the church
just as He
had been the center of interest and unity among them; He is the
object of devotion, even worship, in the church
just as He
had been the
object of His disciples» loyalty.
In opposing eliminativism, I
have argued that a nexus is not
just a set of actual entities and an eternal
object (i.e., the relation of prehension).
A few years back, Imus hazed me on his program for weeks after I
objected during an interview to a segment he
'd just aired....
Others
would refuse it the name because they regard as realistic only a theory of perception which asserts that what we perceive exists
just as we perceive it independently of its being perceived, whereas I, like Whitehead, think that the
object of perception really is what we perceive it to be only as what Whitehead calls an element in an actual situation that includes as other constituents not only the context but also the perceiver.
since the Sun is the biggest
object in our solar system, it makes sense that it
would have the strongest gravitational pull,
just as it makes sense that we weigh less /
have less gravity on the moon since it is not as large or as dense as the Earth.
It is the referential horizon that determines one's perception and understanding, as R. Hart
has observed in the case of a cow, that some seek it as an
object of worship while others as
just beefsteak.113 The referential horizon determines our perception and consequent understanding.
I share the objection to Neo-Darwinism, but I
object just as strongly to the alternatives that these Christians
have thus far proposed.
In other words, we
have just examined only a small number of the functions which the eternal
object might play.
I must now explain
just why Christian and Leclerc believe that eternal
objects play a more significant role in objectification than the role which I
have granted them.
This is the origin of the belief that inanimate
objects can convey miraculous power when they
have been handled or
just blessed by a saint or holy person.
But no; he
objects that
would not be
just; he'll accept the offer on the understanding that only the guilty one will become his master's slave.
Looking at the nigh unfathomable complexity and vastness of the Universe and assuming that an anthropocentric Creator made it all
just so that we can exist as His favoured
objects is akin to Adam's puddle believing the hole he finds himself in was made
just to
have him in it.
Just because radiocarbon dating has flaws does not mean the dozen other methods for dating objects are automatically bogus which is why the scientific community believes the 4.5 billion year age of the earth, it's because they did not use just a single method of testing to estimate that age, they used several different methods which all confirmed the same approximate
Just because radiocarbon dating
has flaws does not mean the dozen other methods for dating
objects are automatically bogus which is why the scientific community believes the 4.5 billion year age of the earth, it's because they did not use
just a single method of testing to estimate that age, they used several different methods which all confirmed the same approximate
just a single method of testing to estimate that age, they used several different methods which all confirmed the same approximate age.
IANAL, but if the condo
had just banned all external
objects, they probably
would have been fine.
She also thought that the conduct of the war
had met the
just war principle of proportionality, which calls for using the minimal level of force needed to achieve the intended
object.
Obviously you don't realize that an asteriod the size of
just the Empire State Building that actually makes it to the surface of the earth at the average speed of most
objects coming from the asteroid belt in our solar system
would cause enough destruction and devastation on earth to wipe out most if not all of the planet.
On the other hand eternal
objects, viewed in their individual multiplicity, are by definition bound to be connected with other eternal
objects, 26
just as, analogously, an occasion
has to be viewed as a concrete relation to other occasions and nexuses of occasions.
They dare them to «stand up to carping critics who
have nothing real to
object to but are
just nostalgic for the old secularist days.»
Here too it is true that I not only
have my body in a subject -
object - relationship, but much more, that as subject I am my body, a body that for me is something more and quite other than
just a peculiarly intimate bit of the surrounding world (PR 81) with which I am not identified.
To deny all subjectivity to cats, as Descartes did, is
just as counterintuitive as to attribute such subjectivity to
objects that
have none of these characteristics.
What hermeneutics
just questions in Husserlian idealism is that it
has inscribed its immense and unsurpassable discovery of intentionality in a conceptuality which weakens its import, especially for the subject -
object relation....
Moreover, sensa are declared to
have some form of realization that differs from that of patterns: «But the realization of a sensum in its ideal shallowness of intensity, with zero width, does not require any other eternal
object, other than its intrinsic apparatus of individual and relational essence; it can remain
just itself, with its unrealized potentialities for patterned contrasts» (PR 115 / 176).
It is
just at that last point, however, that Hartshorne
would object.
Just because that something is the second brightest object in the night sky and you've probably seen it just about every single night of your entire life is no excus
Just because that something is the second brightest
object in the night sky and you
've probably seen it
just about every single night of your entire life is no excus
just about every single night of your entire life is no excuse...
where all initiatives, whatever their
object,
had to originate, and where — after 1935 — a bride
would often go immediately after her wedding to exchange the gold ring which the priest
had just blessed for a ring made of iron.
I happen to think these do more to disadvantage women and titilate men who want to objectify women as sex
objects but hey I am
just a guy so what do I know and what gives me the right to
have an opinion about «slut walks» right?
In my comment a couple of days ago I went through a thought experiment concerning the third possibility above and arrived at the following — if existence
just is, then it was not created (either from God or out of nothingness) and therefore it
has always been here (remember I'm talking about all of existence, not a conceivably lesser
object like the universe).