These issues include: (a) the need to determine when the
obligation of any nation is triggered, (b) difficulties in determining which adaptation and compensation needs are attributable to human - induced warming versus natural variability, (c) challenges in allocating responsibilities among all nations that have emitted ghg above their fair share of safe global emissions, (e) challenges in prioritizing
limited funds among all adaptation and compensation needs, (f) needs to set funding priorities in consultation with those who are vulnerable to climate change impacts as a matter of procedural justice, and (e) the need to consider the
capacity of some nations to fund adaptation and compensation needs.
It compared the potential of supporting governance and
capacity strengthening with the more
limited «mutual
obligation» approach in respect of welfare reform - an approach which the Report concluded was overstretched in the Indigenous policy context and unlikely to produce the breadth of outcome and positive results hoped for.