Not exact matches
In a landmark 1957
decision, the U.S. Supreme Court asserted that
obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment.
These questions are deeply relevant to porn, and many judgments on them are embedded in the Supreme Court's
decisions about
obscenity.
In this context a series of judicial
decisions concerning
obscenity, freedom of expression, and, most notoriously, abortion itself has effectively elevated these new «rights» to the status of an orthodoxy from which dissent is increasingly not tolerated.
In a free speech
decision having to do with
obscenity, Justice Harlan opined in 1971, «The Constitution leaves matters of taste and style so largely to the individual.»
But Supreme Court
decisions of the»60s and»70s have rendered
obscenity pretty ungainly to work with as a criminal charge.
«no person, not even the most learned judge, much less a layman, is capable of knowing in advance of an ultimate
decision in his particular case by this Court whether certain material comes within the area of «
obscenity.»