Sentences with phrase «observable universe»
The phrase "observable universe" means the portion of the universe that we can see and study. It includes all the galaxies, stars, and other celestial objects that we can observe using telescopes and other tools. However, there may be more to the universe beyond what we can currently see, so the observable universe is only a part of the whole. Full definition
Ultimately, as he states, the God creative enough «to make the entire observable universe in a dense dot of pure energy is incomprehensible, beyond human imagining,» but still «we can see the consequences of this unimaginably powerful creative act: a universe congenial to the ultimate formation of life, life giving rise to intelligence that can ask questions science can not answer.
firstthings.com
«Observable universe contains two trillion galaxies, 10 times more than previously thought.»
Leah Crane suggests that gravity may be «leaking» from our own observable universe into tiny hidden extra dimensions.
These waves are direct evidence that the currently observable universe expanded rapidly from a subatomic volume in the first tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang.
(e.g. 13.8 billion year old observable universe, evolution, etc..)
«Imagine you go to a very, very large scale — much larger than our current observable universe,» explains Jonathan Braden, a cosmologist at University College London.
If you multiply that by the estimated number of galaxies in the observable universe (10 trillion is a modest guess) you get a number that is 1 with 24 zeroes after it: 1 septillion.
Similarly, an A.I. designed to maximize paperclip production might try to convert first the Earth and then increasingly large chunks of the observable universe into stationery.
For example, the European Space Agency estimates there's about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (or 10 24) stars in the observable universe.
BTW where did all the anti matter in our observable universe disappear to, lurking around somewhere?
I know there are at least 200 billion other galaxies with at least 200 billion to 1 trillion stars in each in the observable universe, I know what chemical reaction means and what they cause (life).
Besides all of that, the burden of proof lies upon the person making the claim and the religious are the ones making a claim that something outside the observable universe actually exists.
But, for all intents and purposes, that is good enough, unless one truly wishes to reject the observable universe as a whole (which is a whole different can of worms, which I will not open).
That is to imply that perhaps the observable universe had a beginning, but not all of existance.
The size of the entire universe is more difficult but we could say that the part of the universe visible to us, compared to the entire universe, would be the equivalent of a single atom in relation our observable universe.
My religion is based on the observable universe... and that lens is expanding as we move forward in time.
L4H, To fully understand it you need to take some physics but the gist is, our observable universe started as a quantum fluctuation (happens all the time right under your nose).
When this happens in nothing (as opposed to the vacuum of our space), it can expand in an inflationary way, creating an observable universe.
Our observable universe had a beginning and the there is no aspect of it that conflicts with known physics.
Our observable universe had a beginning
So in the observable universe, there is no god.
Secondly, what we call time in our observable universe, started at the instant this observable universe started.
The beginning of our observable universe may have had a cause, but there are a number of completely natural causes that have been hypothesized that require no supernatural power, much less an intelligent agent.
In fact, many more universes that there are stars in the observable universe!
Origin refers to the origin of our observable universe.
The Big Bang says our observable universe had a beginning, NOT that all existence had a beginning.
Similarly inflationary cosmology doesn't claim that the entire universe derived from a point, not even that the observable universe did.
I think that some people confuse the beginning of our observable universe with the beginning of everything.
Dr. Wickman does not understand the theory, because Inflation isn't the beginning of our observable universe, so it doesn't bear on the first cause (the argument central to her opinion).
So our observable universe is part of some «thing» bigger.
How much thought does it require to recognize that the universe with its estimated 400 billion galaxies (Ethan Siegel, theoretical astrophysicist who specializes in cosmology said that he «wouldn't be surprised to find that there are maybe even close to a trillion galaxies in the observable universe.»
Actually, The AP is a natural alternative to the need for a God to explain the observable universe and life.
Vic, The Big Bang is the beginning of our observable universe, not necessarily the beginning of all existence.