Even the admirable Revkin doesn't get it quite right: On horizontal surfaces,
observations and modeling show a role for melting in both the baseline ablation and the sensitivity of ablation to precipitation and temperature; melting is the dominant ablation mechanism on vertical ice cliffs; and though Kaser et al find «no evidence» about rising temperatures, it is only because the in situ studies don't cover a long enough period to detect trends.
Not exact matches
Six
models showed favourable effects on primary outcome measures (e.g., standardized measures of child development outcomes
and reduction in behaviour problems).13 Only studies with outcomes using direct
observation, direct assessment, or administrative records were included.
Covering the period since 1950, the researchers
show how the science has leaped ahead thanks to computerisation, mathematical
modelling and new technologies of
observation.
Observations and the high - resolution climate
model CM2.6
show a strong relationship between a weakening Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)
and an increase in the proportion of warm - temperate slope water entering the U.S. Northeast Continental Shelf, primarily through the Gulf of Maine's Northeast Channel.
By comparing the
models to recent
observations of clusters in the Milky Way galaxy
and beyond, the results
show that Advanced LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational - Wave Observatory) could eventually see more than 100 binary black hole mergers per year.
The study, which combined experimental
observations with mathematical
modeling,
showed that the flow of liquid can have two significant effects on microbes: «It quenches the ability of microbes to chase food,» Stocker says, «
and it helps microbes find surfaces.»
They then used the earlier
observations of the changing abundances of the three pairs of predators
and prey — leveraging data sets collected by other scientists — to
show how the
models would apply.
Shown are the 1988 - 2014trends in springtime ozone levels on days that were very smoggy (top panel)
and of average smogginess (bottom panel), from
observations (left)
and from a
model built by the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (right).
«Guided by
observations that
show that the membrane thickness varies from pole to pole, we constructed a mathematical
model that considers the egg to be a pressurized elastic shell that grows
and showed that we can capture the entire range of egg shapes observed in nature,» said Mahadevan.
The study is a «painstaking analysis» of the fragmented satellite record
and shows some consistency between
models and observations of clouds, says meteorologist Bjorn Stevens of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany.
The discovery was that Procyon, one of the most studied stars,
shows no pulsations at all, which contradicts 20 years of ideas
and observations,
and forced astronomers to rethink their
models for stars.
You speak of heat going into the oceans, but didn't the last IPCC report
show model projections of ocean heat content vs
observations,
and there was no extra heat in the oceans?
With the aid of global Earth
observations and data - driven
models, the researchers
show that on average, extreme events prevent the uptake of around 3 petagrams carbon per year by the vegetation.
The figure below, taken from the 2007 IPCC report,
shows model runs with only natural forcings;
model runs with all forcings;
and observations of surface temperatures for the whole globe — land areas
and ocean areas.
However,
models do not get quite the same distribution of warming seen in the
observations; the
observations tend to
show less tropospheric warming
and more stratospheric cooling in tropical regions (e.g. 20 South to 20 North).
Over the last five years, the BAMS report has examined more than 100 events as part of a burgeoning sub-field of climate science that uses
observations and climate
models to
show how human - caused warming has already affected the odds or severity of many of the weather extremes we experience now.
This approach allowed them to compare the rate
and distribution of warming predicted by
models with those
shown in
observations.
While complex, the take - aways are that the
observations,
shown in panels H
and I, are much more similar to the all - forcings
model runs (panel A)
and the anthropogenic forcings - only runs (panel D) than to the runs using either all natural forcings (E) or only specific natural forcings (volcanoes only in F, solar only in G).
A more comprehensive comparison of
models and observations is
shown in Figure 2 of the Santer et al paper, reproduced below.
The team relied on climate
modeling as well as
observations to
show that the effect is already occurring in the Arctic
and is expected to increase in the future as the climate warms.
The
observations show a bluer disc colour
and a lower degree of polarisation for projected distances < 40au than predicted by the
models.
Research (in Fama
and French 1992, for example)
shows that book - to - price (B / P) also predicts stock returns, so consistently so that Fama
and French (1993
and 1996) have built an asset pricing
model based on the
observation.
It moves between his direct address of the
show («Seeing the paintings
and sculptures
and models as small images makes me think about remnants») to fragments of narrative, personal
observation, dreams,
and excerpts from poetry
and song lyrics.
Regarding all these hypotheticals of Earth - ssytem timescale feedbacks, etc - before results are brought forward with high confidence
and reach a level of minimal academic disagreement, they should be understood physically, be exhibited in a range of
models from simple to complex, begin to emerge in
observations against natural variability, are
shown to be robust to methodological choices
and interpretation,
and are borne out paleoclimatically.
All
models show basically the same behaviour that is in line with basic theory
and observations.
You speak of heat going into the oceans, but didn't the last IPCC report
show model projections of ocean heat content vs
observations,
and there was no extra heat in the oceans?
Even with a near - perfect
model and accurate
observations,
model -
observation comparisons can
show big discrepancies because the diagnostics being compared while similar in both cases, actually end up be subtly (
and perhaps importantly) biased.
However, we have addressed the criticisms
and have
shown that the results remain — especially the profound disconnect between
models and observations.
Nevertheless it is interesting to consider this alongside, say, Stott
and Jones (2012) who
showed that constraining the
models with recent
observations makes the higher end of long - term projections look less likely, although long - term warming is still projected.
And yes, there is such evidence — in the predicted response to volcanic forcing, the ozone hole, orbital variations, the sun, paleo - lake outbursts, the response to ENSO etc. that all
show models matching the
observations skillfully (which is not to say they match perfectly).
In some cases, reviewers
and / or editors supportive of mainstream views totally block important papers from being published; McKitrick, McIntyre
and Herman had to completely rewrite their recent paper —
showing that high tropical tropospheric temperature trends for the last three decades produced by climate
models are inconsistent with
observations — as a study of applying statistical methods developed in econometrics,
and submit it to a journal with a more open - minded editor, in order to get it published at all.
Abstract:... Here we
show that a pronounced strengthening in Pacific trade winds over the past two decades — unprecedented in
observations / reanalysis data
and not captured by climate
models — is sufficient to account for the cooling of the tropical Pacific
and a substantial slowdown in surface warming through increased subsurface ocean heat uptake.
Comparisons with
observations in these regions
show good agreement between the
model and the
observations.
The GFDL
model does happen to
show the largest trend (
and yet, as you point out, the SLP gradient in recent years does not exactly mimic the
observations...).
The DSLPA index computed from HadSLP2
shows a much more «trend - like» reduction than the datasets
shown in the manuscript, in which the 1970s shift plays a less pivotal role; though the amplitude of slope of the linear trend is consistent with the
model and observations.
The evaluation of the
model leaves much to be desired: no differences are
shown compared with
observations,
and some errors are large.
A series of sensitivity tests
show that our detection results are robust to observational data coverage change, interpolation methods, influence of natural climate variability on
observations,
and different
model sampling (see Supplementary Information).
They do cite a study by Lindzen
and Choi, which has
shown, based on ERBE satellite
observations, that the net impact of a doubling of CO2 including all feedbacks is likely to be significantly lower than the
model - based estimates by Myhre for sensitivity without feedbacks.
In agreement with climate
models, satellite data
and hydrographic
observations show that sea level is not rising uniformly around the world.
In fact, your charts
show zero correspondence between
observations and model products, excepting only that which may be attributable to random match.
Note that he used the past in his sentence «satellite data
showed no warming»
and then he goes on «The report
showed that selective corrections to the atmospheric data could lead to some warming, thus reducing the conflict between
observations and models descriptions of what greenhouse warming should look like.»
Since (by then) not all
models showed more warming aloft than on the surface (which I wouldn't call a strong sign of reliability in the
models) the gap between
models and observations closed just enough to make both statistically compatible.
However, the simulation of clouds in climate
models has
shown modest improvement relative to
models available at the time of the AR4,
and this has been aided by new evaluation techniques
and new
observations for clouds.
He
showed the kind of products that would be soon available to the Copernicus C3S service in terms of
observations, reanalysis
and model outputs.
McKitrick McIntyre
and Herman wrote a paper in 2010
showing that the warming in the
models was significantly greater than in the
observations.
New research
shows that
models can reproduce interannual variability, but none can capture the distinction between eastern Pacific
and central Pacific El Niño events that is found in
observations.
1) Fyfe et al
show the difference between
model predictions
and observations, but then note that there are several distorting factors in that comparison.
«The satellite
observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during
and after warming than the climate
models show,» Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release.
Updating this diagram to include 2014 is going to increase the discrepancy between the
models and observations, because the climate
models show an inexorable warming.
I think we can safely assume that if there was even one
model that
showed anything like a reasonable agreement with
observations the alarmist propaganda machine would have made sure that it was on the front page of every newspaper in the land
and at the top of every news bulletin.