Not exact matches
While we need enhanced coverage
at local
scales, successful international coordination of these
observations will allow for nesting of these local
observations within a
global context.
Obtaining reliable estimates of photosynthesis
at global scale has been challenging and these new
observations thus provide a new, valuable data source.
By comparing mercury
observations at 50 forested, marine, and urban monitoring stations, the study published in Nature Geoscience (March 26, 2018) finds that vegetation uptake of mercury is important
at the
global scale.
You can also account for possible errors in the amplitudes of the external forcing and the model response by
scaling the signal patterns to best match the
observations without influencing the attribution from fingerprinting methods, and this provides a more robust framework for attributing signals than simply looking
at the time history of
global temperature in models and obs and seeing if they match up or not.
However, models would need to underestimate variability by factors of over two in their standard deviation to nullify detection of greenhouse gases in near - surface temperature data (Tett et al., 2002), which appears unlikely given the quality of agreement between models and
observations at global and continental
scales (Figures 9.7 and 9.8) and agreement with inferences on temperature variability from NH temperature reconstructions of the last millennium.
Answering this question requires
observations and modeling
at a wide range of
scales from the microbial - to the
global -
scale.
Seeking to better understand historical changes in flooding, Do et al. (2017) analyzed records of maximum daily streamflow from 3558 locations to develop «the most comprehensive
observation - based record of... streamflow
at the
global scale currently available.»
LOCA downscaling estimates finer -
scale climate detail from a coarse - resolution
global model using a new high - resolution historical
observation dataset developed by researchers
at the University of Colorado.
-- the overall change to the
global heat balance climate from basic physics bounded by paleo
observations (over time increasingly constrained by modern
observations)-- the probable overall patterns of regional change
at a large
scale — the range of impacts.
In the mid 19th century the largest components of the uncertainty
at annual time
scales are the measurement and sampling uncertainty and the coverage uncertainty because there were few
observations made by a small
global fleet.
The two periods are of different length, and
at different temperature levels, with different error bars, and we already know from Cowtan & Way and other basic
observations that the so - called «
global» dataset isn't representative of the
scale of the change but tends to minimize differences: you can't simply subtract one rate from the other and get a valid result.
The issue is the time of the year, latitude and type.The Krakatoa problem is well known eg Stenchikov 2006 ie that the models over estimate the
global forcing.Hansen suggested that the
observations were incorrect, however the Giss model gets the AO sign incorrect and arctic central temps incorrect in
scale and time so.This is due to the incorrect heteregenous chemistry
at high latitudes eg chapter3 WMO 2003, Ozone assessment 2011.
Obtaining reliable estimates of photosynthesis
at global scale has been challenging and these new
observations thus provide a new, valuable data source.
the current assessment concludes that there is not enough evidence
at present to suggest more than low confidence in a
global -
scale observed trend in drought or dryness (lack of rainfall) since the middle of the 20th century, owing to lack of direct
observations, geographical inconsistencies in the trends, and dependencies of inferred trends on the index choice.
Aires, F., C. Prigent, and W.B. Rossow, 2005: Sensitivity of satellite microwave and infrared
observations to soil moisture
at a
global scale: 2.
Prigent, C., F. Aires, W.B. Rossow, and A. Robock, 2005: Sensitivity of satellite microwave and infrared
observations to soil moisture
at a
global scale: Relationship of satellite
observations to in situ soil moisture measurements.