This Nature Climate Change paper concluded, based purely on simulations by the GISS - E2 - R climate model, that estimates of the transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) based on
observations over the historical period (~ 1850 to recent times) were biased low.
In any event, Marvel use the single forcing runs to appraise how TCR and ECS estimated from
observations over the historical period compare with actual, CO2 forced, TCR and ECS.
To help address these challenges, scientists run hurricane models calibrated with
observations over the historical period to project future trends and understand the major factors driving these trends.
Not exact matches
Here we apply such a method using near surface air temperature
observations over the 1851 — 2010
period,
historical simulations of the response to changing greenhouse gases, aerosols and natural forcings, and simulations of future climate change under the Representative Concentration Pathways from the second generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2).
There are so few data
observation points anyway, that water level data is surely as anecdotal as when I make references to actual
historical events demonstrating sea levels
over extended
periods in mans recent history?