Sentences with phrase «observations than climate science»

Of course, he still claims to have more confidence in astronomical observations than climate science, but as he put it:

Not exact matches

Over the last five years, the BAMS report has examined more than 100 events as part of a burgeoning sub-field of climate science that uses observations and climate models to show how human - caused warming has already affected the odds or severity of many of the weather extremes we experience now.

[Response: Experiments and observations in climate science are far less controlled than the neutrino experiment, and yet you think that they somehow rise to the level of unchallengeable?

All in all the science of hurricanes does appear to be much more fun and interesting than the average climate change issue, as there is a debate, a «fight» between different hypothesis, predictions compared to near - future observations, and all that does not always get pre-eminence in the exchanges about models.

It continues a dangerous president in climate science to make up data in regions that requires guess work rather than observations.

Climate science is the only science of which I'm aware (and my graduate training is in atmospheric science) where the observed data are consistently altered to conform to the theory, rather than the theory revised to conform to actual temperature observations and data.

Climate science, like other branches of science such as astronomy, relies on observation rather than experimentation.

You seem to generally accept WG1 as the «best available summary» of climate science today, while I am more skeptical, particularly with regard to its understatement of uncertainty, its myopic fixation on anthropogenic climate forcing, its superficial handling of natural climate forcing factors and its many exaggerations or distortions, which go toward making AGW look more alarming than is really supported by the physical observations.

Andrew Montford's observation comes in response to an article by Gavin Schmidt, in which he apparently shows more reflection on the problems of science and advocacy than I would have expected, given his robust statements about «deniers», and his refusal to debate with more sceptical climate scientists in the past, and his impatience with his scientific critics, to the delight of climate activists.

This bizarre notion that models are somehow more reliable than empirical observation is NOT just a climate science thing.

However, I am overjoyed that my despicable tactics, such as deconstructing bad science and investigating the climate through observations rather than models, have driven you to exclamations marks!

Rather than seeing climate science self - correct, most climate modelers are pretending these observations have not been made.

A mismatch between them can arise from a mis - specification of any of these components and climate science is full of examples where reported mismatches ended up being due to problems in the observations or forcing functions rather than the models (ice age tropical ocean temperatures, the MSU records etc.).