Not exact matches
Since it was the first
time that this mechanism was
observed at such a
scale in a relatively developed country, it was called «Dutch disease.»
But the brain synchrony we were
observing was
at such high
time -
scales — of three to nine oscillations per second — that we still need to figure out how exactly eye gaze and vocalisations create it.»
Lead researcher Dr Morgan Beeby said: «We are used to
observing evolution
at the
scale of animals or plants, such as the giraffe's neck slowly getting longer over
time to reach previously inaccessible food.
Such collisional avalanches can happen very quickly — consistent with the
time scales observed at TYC 8241 2652.
«On a bigger
scale, sensors could be placed
at different locations
at catchment
scale to
observe any changes in the level of salinity within a field over
time, having a direct impact on irrigation strategies.
To
observe these atomic -
scale interactions happening many
times per second, Bussmann's team is using the Cray XK7 Titan supercomputer located
at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility located
at DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
Dr. Yu's research has evolved to understand interfacial phenomena
at the fundamental atomic and molecular level that are relevant to the
observed changes across multiple
time and space
scales in the environment, with implications in biological systems (e.g., biofilm and cell), aerosol, catalysis, and materials.
[34] The light curve of B varies on a short
time scale and there has been
at least one
observed flare.
The geometric homeostasis of mature epithelia
observed at short enough
time -
scale thus raises the problem to understand how cells, if considered as noisy individual actuators, do adapt across individual intercellular contacts to locally balance their
time - average contractile stress.
While neural oscillations entrain to the dynamics of speech
at distinct
time scales, it is yet unclear whether neural entrainment
observed across studies and frequency ranges reflect the same underlying mechanism.
---- Concurrent - Related Evidence of Validity: Concurrent - related evidence of validity is
observed when, in this case, large -
scale standardized test and other criterion data are collected
at the same
time.
That's one thing, but the model variability
at a 10 - year
time scale encompasses the
observed surface trends, even for HadCRUT3 which probably warms too little.
Detailed statistics for
observed and modelled temperature
time series
at Albany on climatic
scale.
Even a perfect model can deviate significantly from past
observed trends or changes, just because the physical system allows variability
at decadal
time scales; the climate and its trend that we're experiencing is just one of the many climates that we could have had.
Such Hurst phenomena have been
observed in the stochastic processes of nature in the area of hydrology (Hurst) and also in the proxy record of annual mean surface temperature
at a millennial
time scale (Barnett).
Change to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is
observed to follow change to global temperature
at all
time scales.
But there is a statistical implication, namely that it is a
time scale of averaging
at which new properties emerge in the average that are not
observed in the raw observations.
This corresponds nicely to what would be expected from models (see, e.g., the EPICA Challenge) and is not unreasonably different from the sensitivity
observed at shorter
time scales, as Ferdinand Engelbeen noted.
But it would have exactly the consequence that I said: the natural, preanthropogenic variability
at the relevant
time scale (decades, centuries, millennia), which is precisely related to the amplitude of the FT
at this frequency, should be much lower than the
observed signal.
There continues to be very high confidence that models reproduce
observed large -
scale mean surface temperature patterns... There is high confidence that regional -
scale surface temperature is better simulated than
at the
time of the AR4.
A study of observational data sets from the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) concluded that «rates of early 21st - century mass loss are without precedent on a global
scale,
at least for the
time period
observed and probably also for recorded history» (Zemp et al. 2015).
Several analyses of ring width and ring density chronologies, with otherwise well - established sensitivity to temperature, have shown that they do not emulate the general warming trend evident in instrumental temperature records over recent decades, although they do track the warming that occurred during the early part of the 20th century and they continue to maintain a good correlation with
observed temperatures over the full instrumental period
at the interannual
time scale (Briffa et al., 2004; D'Arrigo, 2006).
The Karnofsky
scale was reportedly valid and reliable in several patient populations.21 In this study good agreement was
observed between two raters in the allocation of patients to the specified outcome categories (Cohen's (kappa) greater than 0.8
at every
time point).22 Subsidiary measures of functioning included a patient rating of interference with daily activities, 23 improvement in employment status, and number of days spent in bed each week.
The highest associations between early and later scores were
observed in relation to the total difficulties
scale where those with borderline scores and those with abnormal scores
at age 3 had odds 8 and 17
times higher than those with normal scores of having a score in the higher ranges
at age 5.