Barnett et al. «Penetration of Human - Induced Warming into the World's Oceans» (Science, Vol 309, Issue 5732, 284 - 287, 8 July 2005) «A new study has found a «compelling agreement» between
observed changes in ocean temperatures since 1960 and the changes simulated by two climate models under rising atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases.
Not exact matches
«By prescribing the effects of human - made climate
change and
observed global
ocean temperatures, our model can reproduce the
observed shifts
in weather patterns and wildfire occurrences.»
The westerlies
in the Northern Hemisphere, which increased from the 1960s to the 1990s but which have since returned to about normal as part of NAO and NAM
changes, alter the flow from
oceans to continents and are a major cause of the
observed changes in winter storm tracks and related patterns of precipitation and
temperature anomalies, especially over Europe.
The
temperature increases are consistent with
observed changes in the cryosphere and
oceans.
Consistent with
observed changes in surface
temperature, there has been an almost worldwide reduction
in glacier and small ice cap (not including Antarctica and Greenland) mass and extent
in the 20th century; snow cover has decreased
in many regions of the Northern Hemisphere; sea ice extents have decreased
in the Arctic, particularly
in spring and summer (Chapter 4); the
oceans are warming; and sea level is rising (Chapter 5).
This is not only
in excellent agreement with the
observed temperature changes at the surface (blue stars), it also correctly reproduces the
observed heat storage
in the
oceans — a strong indicator that the model's heat budget is correct.
You've got the radiative physics, the measurements of
ocean temperature and land
temperature, the
changes in ocean heat content (Hint — upwards, whereas if if was just a matter of circulation moving heat around you might expect something more simple) and of course
observed predictions such as stratospheric cooling which you don't get when warming occurs from oceanic circulation.
That illustrates my point, which is that present
changes in surface
temperature is not a good indicator of what we should expect
in the future, and as such, it is not a great idea to make the debate about the
observed ocean temperature.
The significant difference between the
observed decrease of the CO2 sink estimated by the inversion (0.03 PgC / y per decade) and the expected increase due solely to rising atmospheric CO2 -LRB--0.05 PgC / y per decade) indicates that there has been a relative weakening of the Southern
Ocean CO2 sink (0.08 PgC / y per decade) due to
changes in other atmospheric forcing (winds, surface air
temperature, and water fluxes).
Steric sea level is driven by volume
changes through
ocean salinity (halosteric) and
ocean temperature (thermosteric) effects, from which the latter is known to play a dominant role
in observed contemporary rise of GSSL.
This is not only
in excellent agreement with the
observed temperature changes at the surface (blue stars), it also correctly reproduces the
observed heat storage
in the
oceans — a strong indicator that the model's heat budget is correct.
Since the
oceans are massive heat sinks, they cause delays (around a decade or more)
in observed temperature changes from
changes in radiated energy from the sun.
it seems that your conclusion:» the
observed relationship between increased intensity of TCs and rising
ocean temperatures appears to be robust» is
in direct contradiction with your conclusion «our knowledge of likely future
changes in hurricanes or tropical cyclones (TCs) remains an uncertain area of science».
The scientists working on the IPCC assessments have carefully documented
observed changes in air
temperature,
ocean temperature, ice retreat, and sea level rise since the past century.
In this work the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is estimated based on observed near - surface temperature change from the instrumental record, changes in ocean heat content and detailed RF time serie
In this work the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is estimated based on
observed near - surface
temperature change from the instrumental record,
changes in ocean heat content and detailed RF time serie
in ocean heat content and detailed RF time series.
By comparing modelled and
observed changes in such indices, which include the global mean surface
temperature, the land -
ocean temperature contrast, the
temperature contrast between the NH and SH, the mean magnitude of the annual cycle
in temperature over land and the mean meridional
temperature gradient
in the NH mid-latitudes, Braganza et al. (2004) estimate that anthropogenic forcing accounts for almost all of the warming
observed between 1946 and 1995 whereas warming between 1896 and 1945 is explained by a combination of anthropogenic and natural forcing and internal variability.
Temperatures measured by the ARGO floats and the XBTs before them are rising
in the raw data, and the
ocean heat content (OHC) is simply
observed temperature change scaled by the thermal mass of the
ocean layer
in question - not some kind of complex model.
«By prescribing the effects of man - made climate
change and
observed global
ocean temperatures, our model can reproduce the
observed shifts
in weather patterns and wildfire occurrences.»
My opinion expressed elsewhere is that almost all the
temperature changes we
observe over periods of less than a century are caused by cyclical
changes in the rate of energy emission from the
oceans with the solar effect only providing a slow background trend of warming or cooling for several centuries at a time.
Even while identifying some of the
observed change in climatic behaviour, such as a 0.4 C increase
in surface
temperature over the past century, or about 1 mm per year sea level rise
in Northern Indian
Ocean, or wider variation
in rainfall patterns, the document notes that no firm link between the do...
The BEST team found that greenhouse gases and volcanic eruptions could account for most of the
observed temperature change, and suggest that the remainder of the variability is fairly consistent with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), an
ocean cycle, and very little contribution from
changes in solar activity (Figure 2).
The new research uses multiple runs of a coupled
ocean - atmosphere computer model to simulate global
temperature changes in response to climate forcing when the sea surface
temperature (SST)
in the el Niño region follows its historically
observed values.
Wardle and Smith (2004) argued that the upward rainfall trend is consistent with the upward trend
in land surface
temperatures that has been
observed in the south of the continent, independent of
changes over the
oceans.
If there is deep - water formation
in the final steady state as
in the present day, the
ocean will eventually warm up fairly uniformly by the amount of the global average surface
temperature change (Stouffer and Manabe, 2003), which would result
in about 0.5 m of thermal expansion per degree celsius of warming, calculated from
observed climatology; the EMICs
in Figure 10.34 indicate 0.2 to 0.6 m °C — 1 for their final steady state (year 3000) relative to 2000.
Well, I was one of the first persons
in the blogosphere at the time to evaluate that, because I compared the dip
in the
temperature of sampled water with the dip
in the
temperature of near - surface air measured on ships, and
observed that approximately half or so of the dip was explainable by instrumentation
changes and the remainder by some other mechanism — probably a
change in internal
ocean dynamics (PDO, AMO, etc..)
The
oceans may or may not have been a net carbon sink but the extent to which they acted as a net carbon sink would have been reduced by the higher surface
temperatures and that to me suggests that they must have contributed to higher CO2
in the air and since the
oceans are magnitudes more important than human emissions
in the natural carbon cycle that is where we need to look to explain
observed changes.
The
observed patterns of surface warming,
temperature changes through the atmosphere, increases
in ocean heat content, increases
in atmospheric moisture, sea level rise, and increased melting of land and sea ice also match the patterns scientists expect to see due to rising levels of CO2 and other human - induced
changes (see Question 5).
The
observed pattern of
ocean temperature change created a propensity for drought
in some regions around the globe — perhaps including California, which has been experiencing drought conditions more often than not over the past decade and a half.
But that does not
change the
observed fact that the fraction remaining
in the atmosphere has decreased (by around 1 % - point per decade since Mauna Loa measurements started — from around 55 % to around 50 % (even though the
ocean temperature increased marginally over this period).
Put
in a two - hemisphere energy - balance model and using
observed hemispheric
temperature changes and
ocean heat uptake
changes you can easily arrive at an independent total aerosol forcing estimate - one that also implies small net total aerosol forcings that are reasonably consistent with the latest observatiional findings.
The study authors compared the simulations that were correctly synchronized with the
ocean cycles (blue data
in the left frame below) and the most out - of - sync (grey data
in the right frame) to the
observed global surface
temperature changes (red) for each 15 - year period.
Girma Orssengo rightly demonstrates that one can not determine climate sensitivity empirically from
observed changes in CO2 concentration and
in global mean surface
temperature unless one either studies periods that are multiples of ~ 60 years to cancel the transient effects of the warming and cooling phases of the Pacific and related
ocean oscillations or studies periods centered on a phase - transition
in the
ocean oscillations.
The new finding of the importance of multiple
ocean surface
temperature changes to the multi-decadal global warming accelerations and slowdowns is supported by a set of computer modeling experiments,
in which
observed sea surface
temperature changes are specified
in individual
ocean basins, separately.