Sentences with phrase «observed differences in risk»

ASD are about four times more common in boys than girls, but there were no observed differences in risk between boys and girls in the study.

Not exact matches

Rates of obstetrical intervention are high in U.S. hospitals, and we found large absolute differences in the risks of these interventions between planned out - of - hospital births and in - hospital births.38 In contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein U.S. hospitals, and we found large absolute differences in the risks of these interventions between planned out - of - hospital births and in - hospital births.38 In contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein the risks of these interventions between planned out - of - hospital births and in - hospital births.38 In contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein - hospital births.38 In contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analyseIn contrast, serious adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes are infrequent in all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein all the birth settings we assessed, and the absolute differences in risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein risk that we observed between planned birth locations were correspondingly small; for example, planned out - of - hospital births were associated with an excess of less than 1 fetal death per 1000 deliveries in multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analysein multivariate and propensity - score - adjusted analyses.

No significant differences between groups were observed at six to seven months in the risk of underweight (RR 0.92, 95 % CI [0.54 to 1.58], stunting (RR 1.20, 95 % CI [0.57 to 2.53]-RRB-, or wasting (RR 0.42, 95 % CI [0.12 to 1.50]; 1 study / 370 infants) or at nine to ten months (underweight RR 0.93, 95 % CI [0.64 to 1.36]; stunting RR 1.21, 95 % CI [0.62 to 2.37]; wasting RR 0.82, 95 % CI [0.39 to 1.71]; 1 study / 319 infants).

The observed differences due to delivery and feeding modes highlight their importance in shaping the early intestinal microbiome and point to possible explanations for some of the risks and benefits associated with infant delivery and feeding practices.

Modelling flood risk in Europe — global warming the biggest influence In the framework of the HELIX FP7 Project, scientists analysed the differences in projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomein Europe — global warming the biggest influence In the framework of the HELIX FP7 Project, scientists analysed the differences in projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomeIn the framework of the HELIX FP7 Project, scientists analysed the differences in projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomein projected changes in flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomein flood risk at country scale under global warming scenarios of 1.5, 2 and 3 degrees from pre-industrial levels, and discussed reasons for the observed outcomes.

«For the first time, our study points to a risk difference between drinking daily and drinking five or six days a week in the general male population, since earlier studies were conducted on alcohol misusers and patients referred for liver disease and compared daily drinking to «binge pattern» or «episodic» drinking,» observed lead investigator Gro Askgaard, MD, of the Department of Hepatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and the National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

«The higher risk of tumor recurrence that we observed among African American women was reduced when controlling for those factors, suggesting that these genomic differences contribute, at least partly, to the known racial disparity in the survival of African American and Caucasian breast cancer patients.»

Bone loss and the risk of fracture is also a serious concern for the 54 million people in the United States who have low bone density or osteoporosis.1 The three-fold difference observed in bone mechanical strength versus density in the current study should prompt additional review of how physicians assess risk and treat patients with this condition.

Although the difference in patient mortality between male and female physicians was modest, an observed effect size of a 0.43 - percentage point difference or a relative risk reduction of 4 % in mortality is arguably a clinically meaningful difference.

There were no significant differences in mortality risk observed between the «Healthy diet» group and the «Refined grains» or «Breakfast cereal» groups.

Nonetheless, we were surprised by the magnitude of the risk increase observed in our analysis where an average difference of just 8 GI units between tertiles 1 and 3 translated into ≈ 3-fold higher risk of inflammatory disease — related mortality in women.

We did not observe a difference in pregnancy rates in women with either pharmacy access or advance provision; the adjusted risk of pregnancy for both treatment groups was not significantly less than 1.

Differences with regard to behaviour characteristics in externalising children with an elevated caries risk were observed.

These observed differences in neurological activity, consistent with the dual systems model, contribute to increased emotional volatility and difficulty with emotion regulation that increases during adolescence, which ultimately manifests as increased risk for SUDs and comorbid psychopathology (e.g., [29 • •, 36]-RRB-.